School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, Box 956918, 700 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Res Nurs Health. 2012 Jun;35(3):250-64. doi: 10.1002/nur.21476. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
Hospital-based nurses (N = 1,790) from three states reported their interventions to help patients quit smoking. Frequency of nurses' interventions in one low tobacco use state, California (n = 651), were compared to nurses' interventions in two high tobacco use states, Indiana (n = 720) and West Virginia (n = 419). Nurses in California were significantly more likely to Advise smokers to quit (OR 1.34, 95% CI [1.06, 1.69]) and Refer smokers to a Quitline (OR 2.82, 95% CI [1.36, 5.88]) compared with nurses in the high tobacco prevalence states. Other aspects of their interventions did not differ by state. Quitline referral was infrequent (16%) but was quadrupled if nurses arranged for smokers to quit (OR 4.07, 95% CI [3.11, 5.32]).
来自三个州的医院护士（N=1790）报告了他们帮助患者戒烟的干预措施。在烟草使用量较低的加利福尼亚州（n=651），与在烟草使用量较高的印第安纳州（n=720）和西弗吉尼亚州（n=419）的护士干预措施相比，比较了加利福尼亚州护士的干预措施。与高烟草流行州的护士相比，加利福尼亚州的护士更有可能建议吸烟者戒烟（OR 1.34，95%CI [1.06,1.69]）并将吸烟者转介到戒烟热线（OR 2.82，95%CI [1.36,5.88]）。他们的干预措施的其他方面各州之间没有差异。戒烟热线的转介率较低（16%），但如果护士安排吸烟者戒烟，转介率会增加四倍（OR 4.07，95%CI [3.11,5.32]）。
