Neuroimaging Group, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Clinic, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1412-23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0421.
Metacognition is usually construed as a conscious, intentional process whereby people reflect upon their own mental activity. Here, we instead suggest that metacognition is but an instance of a larger class of representational re-description processes that we assume occur unconsciously and automatically. From this perspective, the brain continuously and unconsciously learns to anticipate the consequences of action or activity on itself, on the world and on other people through three predictive loops: an inner loop, a perception-action loop and a self-other (social cognition) loop, which together form a tangled hierarchy. We ask what kinds of mechanisms may subtend this form of enactive metacognition. We extend previous neural network simulations and compare the model with signal detection theory, highlighting that while the latter approach assumes that both type I (objective) and type II (subjective, metacognition-based) decisions tap into the same signal at different hierarchical levels, our approach is closer to dual-route models in which it is assumed that the re-descriptions made possible by the emergence of meta-representations occur independently and outside of the first-order causal chain. We close by reviewing relevant neurological evidence for the idea that awareness, self-awareness and social cognition involve the same mechanisms.
元认知通常被理解为一种有意识、有意图的过程,人们通过这个过程反思自己的心理活动。在这里,我们认为元认知只是更大一类表象再描述过程的一个实例,我们假设这些过程是无意识和自动发生的。从这个角度来看,大脑通过三个预测循环(内部循环、感知-行动循环和自我-他人(社会认知)循环)不断地、无意识地学习预测行动或活动对自身、对世界和对他人的后果,这三个循环共同构成了一个错综复杂的层次结构。我们想知道什么样的机制可能支持这种生成式元认知。我们扩展了之前的神经网络模拟,并将模型与信号检测理论进行了比较,突出表明,虽然后者的方法假设第一类(客观)和第二类(主观、基于元认知的)决策都在不同的层次上利用相同的信号,但我们的方法更接近双路径模型,在该模型中,假设元表象的出现所产生的再描述是独立于一阶因果链之外发生的。最后,我们回顾了相关的神经科学证据,这些证据表明意识、自我意识和社会认知涉及相同的机制。