• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查结果显示,成年人愿意为特药的慷慨保险覆盖支付更高的保费。

Survey results show that adults are willing to pay higher insurance premiums for generous coverage of specialty drugs.

机构信息

Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):683-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1301.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1301
PMID:22492884
Abstract

Generous coverage of specialty drugs for cancer and other diseases may be valuable not only for sick patients currently using these drugs, but also for healthy people who recognize the potential need for them in the future. This study estimated how healthy people value insurance coverage of specialty drugs, defined as high-cost drugs that treat cancer and other serious health conditions like multiple sclerosis, by quantifying willingness to pay via a survey. US adults were estimated to be willing to pay an extra $12.94 on average in insurance premiums per month for generous specialty-drug coverage--in effect, $2.58 for every dollar in out-of-pocket costs that they would expect to pay with a less generous insurance plan. Given the value that people assign to generous coverage of specialty drugs, having high cost sharing on these drugs seemingly runs contrary to what people value in their health insurance.

摘要

对于癌症和其他疾病的特种药物的广泛覆盖,不仅对目前正在使用这些药物的患者有价值,而且对那些认识到将来可能需要这些药物的健康人也有价值。本研究通过调查来量化人们对特种药物保险覆盖范围的意愿,从而评估健康人对特种药物保险覆盖范围的重视程度,这些特种药物被定义为治疗癌症和多发性硬化症等严重健康状况的高成本药物。研究估计,美国成年人平均每月愿意多支付 12.94 美元的保险费来获得慷慨的特种药物覆盖范围--实际上,对于他们预计在保险计划不够慷慨的情况下要自付的每 1 美元,他们愿意多支付 2.58 美元。鉴于人们对特种药物广泛覆盖范围的重视程度,这些药物的高自付费用似乎与人们在医疗保险中看重的内容相悖。

相似文献

1
Survey results show that adults are willing to pay higher insurance premiums for generous coverage of specialty drugs.调查结果显示,成年人愿意为特药的慷慨保险覆盖支付更高的保费。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):683-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1301.
2
Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的处方药费用分担的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 7.
3
Comparing employer-sponsored and federal exchange plans: wide variations in cost sharing for prescription drugs.比较雇主赞助计划和联邦医保交易所计划:处方药费用分担存在广泛差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):467-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0615.
4
Limited options to manage specialty drug spending.管理专科药物支出的选择有限。
Res Brief. 2012 Apr(22):1-13.
5
Individual insurance benefits to be available under health reform would have cut out-of-pocket spending in 2001-08.医改之下个人保险福利的实施本可以减少 2001-2008 年的自付支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1349-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1206. Epub 2012 May 16.
6
Prescription drug prices in Canada.加拿大的处方药价格。
Issue Brief (Public Policy Inst (Am Assoc Retired Pers)). 2003 Jun(IB62):1-22.
7
Patient and Plan Spending after State Specialty-Drug Out-of-Pocket Spending Caps.州专科药物自付支出上限后患者和计划支出。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):558-566. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1910366.
8
Specialty Drugs - A Distinctly American Phenomenon.特种药物——一种典型的美国现象。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2179-2181. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1909513.
9
Three-tiered-copayment drug coverage and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.三层自付费用药物覆盖范围与非甾体抗炎药的使用
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1679-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1679.
10
Uninsured status and out-of-pocket costs at midlife.中年时的未参保状态与自付费用
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):911-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Clustering affordable care act qualified health plans to understand how and where insurance facilitates or impedes access to HIV prevention.将平价医疗法案合格健康计划进行聚类,以了解保险如何以及在何处促进或阻碍艾滋病毒预防。
AIDS Res Ther. 2024 Nov 19;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12981-024-00674-9.
2
The Impact of Disease-Modifying Therapy Access Barriers on People With Multiple Sclerosis: Mixed-Methods Study.疾病改善治疗获取障碍对多发性硬化症患者的影响:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 30;20(10):e11168. doi: 10.2196/11168.
3
Does the Public Prefer Health Gain for Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review of Public Views on Cancer and its Characteristics.
公众更倾向于癌症患者的健康获益吗?公众对癌症及其特征的看法的系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):793-804. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0511-7.
4
National Survey Indicates that Individual Vaccination Decisions Respond Positively to Community Vaccination Rates.全国调查表明,个人疫苗接种决策对社区疫苗接种率有积极响应。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166858. eCollection 2016.
5
Measuring the Value of Pharmaceuticals in the US Health System.衡量药品在美国医疗体系中的价值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jan;35(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0463-3.
6
Assessing the Value of Treatment to Address Various Symptoms Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a Contingent Valuation Study.评估治疗多发性硬化症相关各种症状的价值:一项条件价值评估研究的结果
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Dec;34(12):1255-1265. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0435-7.
7
Stated and Revealed Preferences for Funding New High-Cost Cancer Drugs: A Critical Review of the Evidence from Patients, the Public and Payers.资助新型高成本抗癌药物的陈述性偏好与显示性偏好:对来自患者、公众和支付方证据的批判性综述
Patient. 2016 Jun;9(3):201-22. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0139-7.