Suppr超能文献

周围神经技术对大骨科手术后住院时间的影响。

The impact of peripheral nerve techniques on hospital stay following major orthopedic surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2012 Jun;13(6):828-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01363.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of regional anesthesia on hospital stay for selected orthopedic procedures compared with traditional pain control modalities.

DESIGN

In an era of an increasing volume of orthopedic surgeries, pain modalities that can optimize patient care while minimizing hospital length of stay can have an impact on reducing hospital costs as well as increasing patient satisfaction and improving patient outcomes. Previous studies have shown the potential benefits of regional anesthesia over traditional intravenous (IV) narcotics in meeting these goals in selected orthopedic procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 494 patients who underwent major orthopedic procedures performed with traditional postoperative pain management alone (IV patient-controlled analgesia and oral narcotics), single injection peripheral nerve block (PNB), and continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) in order to determine the impact that different pain modalities might have on hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

When compared with traditional pain control modalities, single PNB and CPNB were associated with decreased length of hospital stay, though results for specific surgeries varied. The hazard ratios for hospital discharge from a Current Procedural Terminology code-stratified, covariate (age, gender, and ASA status) adjusted Cox proportional hazards model for single PNB vs no PNB and for CPNB vs no PNB were 1.35 (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.79) and 1.91 (95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.57), respectively, pointing toward earlier hospital discharge when PNBs were used. CONCLUSIONS Our retrospective case review showed that, overall, hospital lengths of stay tended to be shorter for orthopedic surgery patients receiving single PNB and CPNB than for those receiving no block and traditional pain management.

摘要

目的

比较局部麻醉与传统疼痛控制方式对特定骨科手术住院时间的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 494 例接受传统术后疼痛管理(静脉患者自控镇痛和口服阿片类药物)、单次外周神经阻滞(PNB)和连续外周神经阻滞(CPNB)的骨科大手术患者的病历,以确定不同疼痛管理方式对住院时间的影响。

结果

与传统疼痛控制方式相比,单次 PNB 和 CPNB 与住院时间缩短相关,尽管具体手术的结果有所不同。单 PNB 与无 PNB 以及 CPNB 与无 PNB 的基于 Current Procedural Terminology 代码分层、协变量(年龄、性别和 ASA 状态)调整 Cox 比例风险模型的住院出院风险比分别为 1.35(95%置信区间:1.02-1.79)和 1.91(95%置信区间:1.42-2.57),这表明使用 PNB 时患者更早出院。

结论

我们的回顾性病例研究表明,总体而言,接受单次 PNB 和 CPNB 的骨科手术患者的住院时间比未接受阻滞和传统疼痛管理的患者更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验