College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Nurs Crit Care. 2012 May-Jun;17(3):138-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00498.x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
This study reviews the historical development of injury severity scoring systems and their application to clinical practice.
A variety of injury severity scoring systems have been developed and applied since more than four decades. It is increasingly important for nurses to be familiar with these scoring systems, their strengths and weaknesses, and their applications to nursing practice.
Systematic literature review.
The injury severity scoring systems developed from the 1970s to 2011 were identified via electronic database searches, footnote chasing and contact with clinical experts. The most frequently used scoring systems in the literature were classified according to the criteria used in each scoring system.
All injury severity scoring systems are valuable but have certain problems. A universal scoring system applicable for various purposes appears difficult to achieve. However, the understanding and proper use of scoring systems will allow us to perform critical evaluations and continual refinement of trauma management.
As nurses and researchers, it is critical that we should know the application of these injury severity scoring systems to ensure their quality and appropriate utilization.
本研究回顾了创伤严重度评分系统的历史发展及其在临床实践中的应用。
自 40 多年前以来,已经开发并应用了多种创伤严重度评分系统。护士越来越有必要熟悉这些评分系统及其优缺点,以及它们在护理实践中的应用。
系统文献回顾。
通过电子数据库搜索、脚注追踪和与临床专家联系,确定了从 20 世纪 70 年代到 2011 年开发的创伤严重度评分系统。根据每个评分系统中使用的标准对文献中最常使用的评分系统进行了分类。
所有创伤严重度评分系统都有一定的价值,但都存在某些问题。适用于各种目的的通用评分系统似乎难以实现。然而,理解和正确使用评分系统将使我们能够对创伤管理进行关键评估和不断改进。
作为护士和研究人员,了解这些创伤严重度评分系统的应用至关重要,以确保其质量和适当的利用。