School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 1;37(21):1834-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318257fdd3.
Mechanical testing of total disc arthroplasty (TDA).
To compare the friction between a polymer socket-on-metal ball and metal socket-on-polymer ball TDA.
A degenerate intervertebral disc can be replaced by TDA. The most common designs have a ball and socket articulation; the contact between the surfaces leads to friction. Friction needs to be minimized to prevent loosening and wear. One of the common material combinations in disc arthroplasty devices is the articulation of a metal socket on polymer ball. However, the combination of a polymer socket on metal ball (which is used in hip arthroplasty) has not been investigated for TDA.
TDA models with either a polymer socket/metal ball or a metal socket/polymer ball were manufactured with ball radii of 10 and 14 mm, each with a radial clearance of 0.35 mm. Samples were tested using a spine simulator with a lubricant of diluted newborn calf serum. Each sample was subjected to an axial load of 1200 N; motions of flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were then applied at frequencies of 0.25 to 2 Hz. Frictional torque was measured to compare the performance of the TDAs.
The frictional torque was found to be significantly higher for a disc with a metal socket/polymer ball than for a disc with a polymer socket/metal ball for both 10 and 14 mm radii in axial rotation, lateral bend, and extension. The frictional torque in flexion (0°-6°) was not found to be significantly different between the 2 different material combinations. However, when the flexion motion was reduced to 0° to 2°, frictional torque in the metal socket/polymer ball was found to be significantly higher than the polymer socket/metal ball.
TDA with a combination of a polymer socket/metal ball has lower friction than the conventional TDA with metal socket/polymer ball. This conclusion has implications in the design of TDA.
全椎间盘置换的力学测试。
比较聚合物球窝与金属球窝全椎间盘置换的摩擦。
退变的椎间盘可被全椎间盘置换所替代。最常见的设计是球窝关节;关节面之间的接触会导致摩擦。为了防止松动和磨损,需要尽量减小摩擦。在椎间盘置换装置中,常见的材料组合之一是金属球窝与聚合物球的关节。然而,金属球窝与聚合物球(用于髋关节置换)的组合尚未被研究用于全椎间盘置换。
制造了球半径为 10 和 14mm、径向间隙为 0.35mm 的聚合物球窝/金属球或金属球窝/聚合物球的全椎间盘置换模型。使用带有稀释新生牛血清的脊柱模拟器对样品进行测试。每个样品承受 1200N 的轴向载荷;然后在 0.25 至 2Hz 的频率下施加屈伸、侧屈和轴向旋转运动。测量摩擦扭矩以比较全椎间盘置换的性能。
在轴向旋转、侧屈和伸展中,金属球窝/聚合物球的全椎间盘置换的摩擦扭矩明显高于聚合物球窝/金属球的全椎间盘置换。在屈伸(0°-6°)中,两种不同材料组合之间的摩擦扭矩没有明显差异。然而,当屈伸运动减少到 0°至 2°时,金属球窝/聚合物球的摩擦扭矩明显高于聚合物球窝/金属球。
聚合物球窝/金属球的全椎间盘置换的摩擦比传统的金属球窝/聚合物球的全椎间盘置换的摩擦小。这一结论对全椎间盘置换的设计具有启示意义。