Service de Médecine Gériatrique-Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Apr;16(4):370-7. doi: 10.1007/s12603-011-0352-6.
Our main objective was to assess whether a home-based program supervised by home helpers (HH) during their normal working hours can prevent excessive sedentariness (mainly maximum walking time and distance) and preserve functional status in elderly people at risk for frailty or disability and using domestic services.
A four-month, open label, randomised trial with two groups called "prevention" and "control".
In the homes of study participants.
The participants were all over 78 years old, lived independently at home, and received the visits of HHs at least once a week.
The intervention combined a self-administered exercise program, with 10 g amino-acid supplementation under the supervision of HHs.
Main outcome measures included physical activity (the PASE questionnaire), functional tests, nutritional and autonomy scores, and compliance (50% or more was considered satisfactory). Non-parametric methods were used for comparisons between the two groups. A linear regression model was fitted to assess the effect of the intervention on the relative variation of outcomes, adjusted for unbalanced baseline co-variables.
One hundred and two persons (prevention n=53, control n=49) with a median age of 85 years were included. Their median Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scores were 6 and 7 respectively. Twenty-three (44%) were good compliers for both interventions. The maximum walking time remained stable while decreasing by 25% in the control group (p=0.0015); and fewer participants had a worsened IADL score in the prevention group (p=0.05). The baseline IADL Score was significantly associated with good compliance to the prevention program (p=0.0011). In good compliers, maximum walking distance and maximum walking time increased by 29.15% (0.0 to 66.7) and 33.3% (-20.0 to 50.0) respectively.
This study confirms the feasibility of a prevention program supervised by HHs, and some benefit from the intervention and identifies predictors for better compliance. It will help in the design of prevention trials for elderly people at risk for frailty.
我们的主要目标是评估家庭助手(HH)在正常工作时间内监督的家庭为基础的计划是否可以预防过度久坐(主要是最大步行时间和距离)并维持有虚弱或残疾风险的老年人的功能状态,并使用家庭服务。
一项为期四个月的、开放性标签的、随机试验,分为两组,称为“预防”和“对照”。
在研究参与者的家中。
所有参与者年龄均超过 78 岁,独立生活在家中,每周至少接受 HH 家访一次。
干预措施结合了自我管理的锻炼计划,在 HH 的监督下补充 10 克氨基酸。
主要结局指标包括身体活动(PASE 问卷)、功能测试、营养和自主评分以及依从性(50%以上被认为是令人满意的)。使用非参数方法比较两组之间的差异。拟合线性回归模型,以评估干预对结局相对变化的影响,同时调整不平衡的基线协变量。
共纳入 102 人(预防组 53 人,对照组 49 人),中位年龄为 85 岁。他们的日常生活活动和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)评分的中位数分别为 6 和 7。23 人(44%)对两种干预措施的依从性都很好。最大步行时间保持稳定,而对照组下降了 25%(p=0.0015);预防组有更多的参与者 IADL 评分恶化(p=0.05)。基线 IADL 评分与预防计划的良好依从性显著相关(p=0.0011)。在依从性好的参与者中,最大步行距离和最大步行时间分别增加了 29.15%(0.0 到 66.7)和 33.3%(-20.0 到 50.0)。
这项研究证实了家庭助手监督的预防计划的可行性,以及一些干预措施的益处,并确定了更好依从性的预测因素。它将有助于设计有虚弱风险的老年人的预防试验。