粘结剂综述。

A review of luting agents.

作者信息

Pameijer Cornelis H

机构信息

Department of Reconstructive Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2012;2012:752861. doi: 10.1155/2012/752861. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Abstract

Due to the availability of a large number of luting agents (dental cements) proper selection can be a daunting task and is usually based on a practitioner's reliance on experience and preference and less on in depth knowledge of materials that are used for the restoration and luting agent properties. This review aims at presenting an overview of current cements and discusses physical properties, biocompatibility and other properties that make a particular cement the preferred choice depending on the clinical indication. Tables are provided that outline the different properties of the generic classification of cements. It should be noted that no recommendations are made to use a particular commercial cement for a hypothetical clinical situation. The choice is solely the responsibility of the practitioner. The appendix is intended as a guide for the practitioner towards a recommended choice under commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Again, no commercial brands are recommended although the author recognizes that some have better properties than others. Please note that this flowchart strictly presents the author's opinion and is based on research, clinical experience and the literature.

摘要

由于有大量的粘结剂(牙科水门汀)可供选择,正确的选择可能是一项艰巨的任务,通常基于从业者的经验和偏好,而较少基于对用于修复的材料和粘结剂特性的深入了解。本综述旨在概述当前的水门汀,并讨论其物理性能、生物相容性以及根据临床适应症使特定水门汀成为首选的其他性能。文中提供了表格,概述了水门汀通用分类的不同性能。需要注意的是,对于假设的临床情况,本文不推荐使用特定的商业水门汀。选择完全由从业者负责。附录旨在为从业者在常见临床场景下做出推荐选择提供指导。同样,虽然作者认识到有些品牌的性能优于其他品牌,但本文不推荐具体的商业品牌。请注意,此流程图严格呈现了作者的观点,且基于研究、临床经验和文献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2c4/3296365/f069a1cafb86/IJD2012-752861.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索