Department of Prosthodontics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):152-158. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_260_23. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
In routine dental care, various dental luting cements are utilized to cement the dental prosthesis. Thus, the aim of the current study was to assess the Cytotoxic effect of three different dental luting cements on human gingival mesenchymal stem cell and evaluation of cytokines and growth factors release.
Cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resin cement (RC) on the human gingival mesenchymal stem cells (HGMSCs) was evaluated. Amongst the cements tested, least cytotoxic cement was further tested for the release of cytokines and growth factors.
MTT test was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the dental luting cements at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h on HGMSCs. Cytokines such as interleukin (IL) 1α & IL 8 and growth factors such as platelet derived growth factor & transforming growth factor beta release from the least cytotoxic RC was evaluated using flow cytometry analysis.
The mean absorbance values by MTT assay and cell viability at various time intervals between four groups were compared using a one way analysis of variance test and Tukey's post hoc test. The least cytotoxic RC group and the control group's mean levels of cytokines and growth factors were compared using the Mann-Whitney test.
As exposure time increased, the dental luting cement examined in this study were cytotoxic. RC was the least cytotoxic, RMGIC was moderate and glass ionomer cement showed the highest cytotoxic effect. Concomitantly, a significant positive biological response of gingival mesenchymal stem cells with the release of ILs when exposed to the RC was observed.
For a fixed dental prosthesis to be clinically successful over the long term, it is imperative that the biocompatibility of the luting cement be taken into account in order to maintain a healthy periodontium surrounding the restoration.
在常规牙科护理中,使用各种牙科水门汀将义齿粘固。因此,本研究旨在评估三种不同牙科水门汀对人牙龈间充质干细胞的细胞毒性作用,并评价细胞因子和生长因子的释放。
评估玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)、树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)和树脂水门汀(RC)对人牙龈间充质干细胞(HGMSCs)的细胞毒性。在所测试的水门汀中,进一步测试细胞毒性最低的水门汀释放细胞因子和生长因子的情况。
使用 MTT 试验在 1 h、24 h 和 48 h 评估牙科水门汀对 HGMSCs 的细胞毒性。使用流式细胞术分析评估从细胞毒性最低的 RC 释放的细胞因子,如白细胞介素(IL)1α 和 IL 8,以及生长因子,如血小板衍生生长因子和转化生长因子β。
采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验比较四组在不同时间点的 MTT 试验平均吸光度值和细胞活力。采用 Mann-Whitney 检验比较细胞毒性最低的 RC 组和对照组细胞因子和生长因子的平均水平。
随着暴露时间的增加,本研究中检查的牙科水门汀具有细胞毒性。RC 的细胞毒性最低,RMGIC 为中度,玻璃离子水门汀的细胞毒性最高。同时,当暴露于 RC 时,牙龈间充质干细胞释放细胞因子,表现出显著的正向生物学反应。
为了使固定义齿在长期临床应用中获得成功,必须考虑水门汀的生物相容性,以维持修复体周围健康的牙周组织。