Jonker Tanya R, MacLeod Colin M
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Sep;66(3):204-11. doi: 10.1037/a0027277. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Practicing the retrieval of some information can lead to poorer retrieval of other related information, a phenomenon called retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). This pattern has been explained as the result of inhibition of the related information during practice (Anderson, 2003). A core assumption of this inhibition account is that, to be suppressed, the related information must compete with the target information at the time of retrieval practice. Three experiments are reported that test this competition assumption. One experiment showed that RIF did not occur without specific retrieval practice of the target items when semantic generation of subordinates was performed. However, in 2 further experiments, RIF did occur when the semantic generation task was paired with category retrieval. Although there was no need for competition between target information and related information in these experiments, RIF was observed. These experiments undermine the competition assumption and hence the inhibition account.
练习提取某些信息会导致对其他相关信息的提取能力变差,这种现象被称为提取诱发遗忘(RIF)。这种模式被解释为练习过程中对相关信息进行抑制的结果(安德森,2003年)。这种抑制理论的一个核心假设是,为了被抑制,相关信息在提取练习时必须与目标信息竞争。本文报告了三个检验这一竞争假设的实验。一个实验表明,当进行下属词的语义生成时,如果没有对目标项目进行特定的提取练习,就不会出现提取诱发遗忘。然而,在另外两个实验中,当语义生成任务与类别提取配对时,提取诱发遗忘确实出现了。尽管在这些实验中目标信息和相关信息之间不需要竞争,但仍观察到了提取诱发遗忘。这些实验削弱了竞争假设,从而也削弱了抑制理论。