Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Bone. 2012 Jul;51(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.028. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
The number and size of resorption cavities in cancellous bone are believed to influence rates of bone loss, local tissue stress and strain and potentially whole bone strength. Traditional two-dimensional approaches to measuring resorption cavities in cancellous bone report the percent of the bone surface covered by cavities or osteoclasts, but cannot measure cavity number or size. Here we use three-dimensional imaging (voxel size 0.7×0.7×5.0 μm) to characterize resorption cavity location, number and size in human vertebral cancellous bone from nine elderly donors (7 male, 2 female, ages 47-80 years). Cavities were 30.10 ± 8.56 μm in maximum depth, 80.60 ± 22.23∗10(3) μm(2) in surface area and 614.16 ± 311.93∗10(3) μm(3) in volume (mean ± SD). The average number of cavities per unit tissue volume (N.Cv/TV) was 1.25 ± 0.77 mm(-3). The ratio of maximum cavity depth to local trabecular thickness was 30.46 ± 7.03% and maximum cavity depth was greater on thicker trabeculae (p<0.05, r(2)=0.14). Half of the resorption cavities were located entirely on nodes (the intersection of two or more trabeculae) within the trabecular structure. Cavities that were not entirely on nodes were predominately on plate-like trabeculae oriented in the cranial-caudal (longitudinal) direction. Cavities on plate-like trabeculae were larger in maximum cavity depth, cavity surface area and cavity volume than cavities on rod-like trabeculae (p<0.05). We conclude from these findings that cavity size and location are related to local trabecular microarchitecture.
松质骨中吸收腔的数量和大小据信会影响骨丢失率、局部组织的应力和应变,并可能影响整个骨强度。传统的二维方法测量松质骨中的吸收腔,报告骨表面被腔或破骨细胞覆盖的百分比,但无法测量腔的数量或大小。在这里,我们使用三维成像(体素大小 0.7×0.7×5.0 μm)来描述来自 9 位老年供体(7 位男性,2 位女性,年龄 47-80 岁)的人椎体松质骨中吸收腔的位置、数量和大小。腔的最大深度为 30.10 ± 8.56 μm,表面积为 80.60 ± 22.23∗10(3) μm(2),体积为 614.16 ± 311.93∗10(3) μm(3)(平均值 ± 标准差)。单位组织体积的腔数(N.Cv/TV)平均为 1.25 ± 0.77 mm(-3)。最大腔深度与局部小梁厚度的比值为 30.46 ± 7.03%,在较厚的小梁上最大腔深度更大(p<0.05,r(2)=0.14)。一半的吸收腔完全位于小梁结构内的节点(两个或多个小梁的交点)上。不在节点上的腔主要位于板状小梁上,方向为颅尾(纵向)。板状小梁上的腔在最大腔深度、腔表面积和腔体积方面大于杆状小梁上的腔(p<0.05)。我们从这些发现中得出结论,腔的大小和位置与局部小梁微结构有关。