• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基因的最优基因组扫描分析。

On optimal gene-based analysis of genome scans.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23219, USA.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 2012 May;36(4):333-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21625. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.21625
PMID:22508187
Abstract

Univariate analysis of markers has modest power when there are multiple causal variants within a gene. Under this scenario, combining the effects of all variants from a gene in a gene-wide statistic is thought to increase power. However, it is not really clear (1) what is the performance of most commonly used gene-wide methods for whole genome scans and (2) how scalable these methods are for more computationally intensive analyses, e.g. analysis of genome-wide sequence data. We attempt to answer these questions by using realistic simulations to assess the performance of a range of gene-based methods: (1) commonly used, e.g. VEGAS and GATES; (2) less commonly used, e.g. Simes, adaptive sum (aSUM), and kernel methods; and (3) a combination of univariate and multivariate tests we proposed for the analysis of markers in linkage disequilibrium. Simes is the fastest method and has good power for single causal variant models. aSUM method has good power for multiple causal variant models, especially at lower gene lengths. Our proposed statistic yields good power for all causal models. Given the extreme data volumes coming from sequencing studies, we recommend a two step analysis of genome scans. The initial step uses the very fast Simes procedure to flag possibly interesting genes. The second step refines interesting signals by using more computationally intensive methods, e.g. (1) aSUM for shorter and (2) VEGAS for larger gene lengths. Alternatively, genome scans can be analyzed using only our proposed method while sacrificing only a modest amount of power.

摘要

当一个基因内存在多个因果变异时,对标记物进行单变量分析的功效有限。在这种情况下,将一个基因中所有变异的效应结合在一个基因范围内的统计中,被认为可以提高功效。然而,目前还不清楚(1)最常用于全基因组扫描的基因范围方法的性能如何,以及(2)这些方法对于更计算密集型的分析(例如,全基因组序列数据的分析)的可扩展性如何。我们试图通过使用现实的模拟来回答这些问题,以评估一系列基于基因的方法的性能:(1)常用的方法,例如 VEGAS 和 GATES;(2)不太常用的方法,例如 Simes、自适应总和 (aSUM) 和核方法;以及(3)我们提出的用于分析连锁不平衡标记物的单变量和多变量检验的组合。Simes 是最快的方法,对于单因果变异模型具有良好的功效。aSUM 方法对于多因果变异模型具有良好的功效,特别是在基因长度较短的情况下。我们提出的统计量对于所有因果模型都具有良好的功效。考虑到测序研究带来的极端数据量,我们建议对全基因组扫描进行两步分析。第一步使用非常快速的 Simes 程序来标记可能感兴趣的基因。第二步通过使用更计算密集的方法(例如,1)aSUM 用于较短的基因,和 2)VEGAS 用于较大的基因长度,来细化感兴趣的信号。或者,可以使用我们提出的方法仅分析基因组扫描,而仅牺牲适度的功效。

相似文献

1
On optimal gene-based analysis of genome scans.基于基因的最优基因组扫描分析。
Genet Epidemiol. 2012 May;36(4):333-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21625. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
2
Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.密集标记数据关联方法的比较
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;32(8):791-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20347.
3
Using tree-based recursive partitioning methods to group haplotypes for increased power in association studies.使用基于树的递归划分方法对单倍型进行分组,以提高关联研究的效能。
Ann Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;69(Pt 5):577-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00193.x.
4
Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.基因关联研究中的效率与效能
Nat Genet. 2005 Nov;37(11):1217-23. doi: 10.1038/ng1669. Epub 2005 Oct 23.
5
Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.直接关联研究与间接关联研究相对效力的详细分析及其解读的意义。
Hum Hered. 2007;64(1):63-73. doi: 10.1159/000101424. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
6
Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering.利用局部单倍型聚类进行全基因组关联研究的高效多位点关联测试。
Genet Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;31(5):365-75. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20216.
7
The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.复杂疾病基因的全基因组关联研究的力量:使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记的间接方法的统计局限性。
J Hum Genet. 2001;46(8):478-82. doi: 10.1007/s100380170048.
8
SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.候选基因区域中的单核苷酸多态性、单倍型及模型选择:多位点数据的简单分析
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;27(4):429-41. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20039.
9
Two adaptive weighting methods to test for rare variant associations in family-based designs.两种适应权重方法在基于家系的设计中检测罕见变异关联。
Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;36(5):499-507. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21646. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Comparison of six statistics of genetic association regarding their ability to discriminate between causal variants and genetically linked markers.六种基因关联统计方法在区分因果变异和基因连锁标记能力方面的比较。
Hum Hered. 2011;72(2):142-52. doi: 10.1159/000332006. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multi-Marker Test for Analyzing Paired Genetic Data in Transplantation.一种用于分析移植中配对遗传数据的多标记测试。
Front Genet. 2021 Oct 13;12:745773. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.745773. eCollection 2021.
2
Integrated analysis of human genetic association study and mouse transcriptome suggests LBH and SHF genes as novel susceptible genes for amyloid-β accumulation in Alzheimer's disease.人类遗传关联研究与小鼠转录组的综合分析提示 LBH 和 SHF 基因是阿尔茨海默病中淀粉样β沉积的新的易感基因。
Hum Genet. 2018 Jul;137(6-7):521-533. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1906-z. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
Disconnect Between Genes Associated With Ischemic Heart Disease and Targets of Ischemic Heart Disease Treatments.
与缺血性心脏病相关的基因与缺血性心脏病治疗靶点之间的脱节。
EBioMedicine. 2018 Feb;28:311-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Multiple linear combination (MLC) regression tests for common variants adapted to linkage disequilibrium structure.针对适应连锁不平衡结构的常见变异的多重线性组合(MLC)回归检验。
Genet Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;41(2):108-121. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22024. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
5
Genome-wide association studies in dogs and humans identify ADAMTS20 as a risk variant for cleft lip and palate.在狗和人类中进行的全基因组关联研究将ADAMTS20鉴定为唇腭裂的一个风险变异体。
PLoS Genet. 2015 Mar 23;11(3):e1005059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005059. eCollection 2015 Mar.
6
The future of genomics for developmentalists.发育生物学家的基因组学未来。
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov;25(4 Pt 2):1263-78. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000606.
7
Association testing strategy for data from dense marker panels.基于高密度标记面板数据的关联分析策略
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080540. eCollection 2013.
8
A fast multilocus test with adaptive SNP selection for large-scale genetic-association studies.一种用于大规模基因关联研究的具有适应性单核苷酸多态性选择的快速多位点检测方法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 May;22(5):696-702. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.201. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Fast association tests for genes with FAST.快速关联测试基因与 FAST。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 23;8(7):e68585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068585. Print 2013.