Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and the Silverman Institute for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Children's Hospital Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2012 May;40(5):1554-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c70.
Dissatisfaction is an important threat to high-quality care. The aim of this study was to identify factors independently associated with dissatisfaction with critical care.
Prospectively collected observational cohort study.
Nine intensive care units at a tertiary care university hospital in the United States.
Four hundred forty-nine family members of adult intensive care unit patients who completed the Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit instrument.
None.
Four family-and patient-related factors ascertainable at intensive care unit admission independently predicted low overall satisfaction: living in the same city as the hospital, disagreement within the family regarding care, having a cardiac comorbidity but being hospitalized in a noncardiac-care intensive care unit, and living in a different household than the patient. When three or more risk factors were present, 63% (95% confidence interval 48%-78%) of families were dissatisfied. Among factors ascertained at the end of the intensive care unit stay, dissatisfaction with six items was independently associated with overall dissatisfaction: 1) perceived competence of nurses (odds ratio for dissatisfaction=5.9, 95% confidence interval 2.3-15.2); 2) concern and caring by intensive care unit staff (odds ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9-12.6); 3) completeness of information (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 2.4-8.1); 4) dissatisfaction with the decision-making process (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.6- 5.6); 5) atmosphere of the intensive care unit (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.8); and 6) atmosphere of the waiting room (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2-6.0).
Specific factors ascertainable at intensive care unit admission identify families at high risk of dissatisfaction with care. Other discrete aspects of the patient/family experience that develop during the intensive care unit stay are also strongly associated with dissatisfaction with the critical care experience. These results may provide insight into the design of future evidence-based strategies to improve satisfaction with the intensive care unit experience.
不满是高质量护理的重要威胁。本研究的目的是确定与重症监护患者不满相关的独立因素。
前瞻性收集的观察队列研究。
美国一家三级护理大学医院的 9 个重症监护病房。
449 名成年重症监护病房患者的家属,他们完成了重症监护病房家庭护理满意度量表。
无。
重症监护病房入院时确定的 4 个与家庭和患者相关的因素独立预测总体满意度低:与医院同市居住、家庭内对护理存在分歧、患有心脏合并症但在非心脏重症监护病房住院、与患者不在同一家庭居住。当存在 3 个或更多危险因素时,63%(95%置信区间 48%-78%)的家庭不满意。在重症监护病房结束时确定的因素中,对 6 个项目的不满与总体不满独立相关:1)护士的感知能力(不满意的优势比=5.9,95%置信区间 2.3-15.2);2)重症监护病房工作人员的关心和关怀(优势比 5.0,95%置信区间 1.9-12.6);3)信息的完整性(优势比 4.4,95%置信区间 2.4-8.1);4)对决策过程的不满(优势比 3.0,95%置信区间 1.6-5.6);5)重症监护病房的氛围(优势比 2.6,95%置信区间 1.4-4.8);6)等候室的氛围(优势比 2.7,95%置信区间 1.2-6.0)。
重症监护病房入院时确定的特定因素可识别出对护理不满意的高风险家庭。在重症监护病房期间出现的患者/家庭经历的其他离散方面也与对重症监护体验的不满密切相关。这些结果可能为设计未来基于证据的策略提供参考,以提高重症监护病房的满意度。