Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jun;39(6):1071-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
To assess family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (ICU) and areas for improvement using quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Prospective cohort study performed in four (mixed surgical, neurological, and cardiological) intensive care units of a university hospital in Germany, using a translated and validated version of the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire, with questions answerable on a rating scale and three open-ended questions about strengths and weaknesses. Quantitative analysis was performed to identify items with low performance and high importance. For qualitative analysis, comments were coded and analyzed to identify important themes. Patient-related data were obtained from an electronic patient data management system.
Participants were 215 family members visiting adult intensive care patients with length of stay over 48 h. Response rate was 28 %. Respondents were highly satisfied; summary scores were 78.3 ± 14.3 [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] on a scale of 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent). Regression analysis failed to identify association with patient- or family-related factors. The following themes for possible improvement emerged from both quantitative and qualitative analyses: patient agitation-consistency, clarity and completeness of information-emotional support-respect and compassion towards families. Families were also dissatisfied with the waiting room, ICU atmosphere, and amenities for visiting relatives.
Families report high satisfaction with intensive care. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement, in particular regarding how ICU staff communicate with families and provide emotional support.
使用定量和定性分析评估重症监护病房(ICU)的家庭满意度和需要改进的地方。
这是在德国一家大学医院的四个(混合外科、神经科和心内科)重症监护病房进行的前瞻性队列研究,使用经过翻译和验证的重症监护病房家庭满意度(FS-ICU)问卷的翻译版本,该问卷的问题可在评分量表上回答,还有三个关于优势和劣势的开放性问题。采用定量分析方法确定表现不佳但重要性高的项目。对于定性分析,对评论进行编码和分析,以确定重要主题。患者相关数据从电子患者数据管理系统中获取。
215 名家庭成员参与了研究,他们探访在 ICU 住院时间超过 48 小时的成年重症监护患者。应答率为 28%。受访者非常满意;总分 78.3±14.3(平均值±标准差),评分范围为 0(差)至 100(优)。回归分析未能确定与患者或家庭相关因素的关联。无论是定量分析还是定性分析,都出现了以下可能需要改进的主题:患者躁动-一致性、信息的清晰度和完整性-情感支持-对家庭的尊重和同情。家属还对等候室、ICU 氛围和探访亲属的设施不满意。
家属报告对重症监护的满意度很高。尽管如此,仍有改进的空间,特别是在 ICU 工作人员与家属沟通和提供情感支持方面。