Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034636. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Electrical signaling allows communication within and between different tissues and is necessary for the survival of multicellular organisms. The ionic transport that underlies transmembrane currents in cells is mediated by transporters and channels. Fast ionic transport through channels is typically modeled with a conductance-based formulation that describes current in terms of electrical drift without diffusion. In contrast, currents written in terms of drift and diffusion are not as widely used in the literature in spite of being more realistic and capable of displaying experimentally observable phenomena that conductance-based models cannot reproduce (e.g. rectification). The two formulations are mathematically related: conductance-based currents are linear approximations of drift-diffusion currents. However, conductance-based models of membrane potential are not first-order approximations of drift-diffusion models. Bifurcation analysis and numerical simulations show that the two approaches predict qualitatively and quantitatively different behaviors in the dynamics of membrane potential. For instance, two neuronal membrane models with identical populations of ion channels, one written with conductance-based currents, the other with drift-diffusion currents, undergo transitions into and out of repetitive oscillations through different mechanisms and for different levels of stimulation. These differences in excitability are observed in response to excitatory synaptic input, and across different levels of ion channel expression. In general, the electrophysiological profiles of membranes modeled with drift-diffusion and conductance-based models having identical ion channel populations are different, potentially causing the input-output and computational properties of networks constructed with these models to be different as well. The drift-diffusion formulation is thus proposed as a theoretical improvement over conductance-based models that may lead to more accurate predictions and interpretations of experimental data at the single cell and network levels.
电信号允许不同组织之间的通讯,是多细胞生物生存所必需的。细胞跨膜电流所依赖的离子转运是由转运体和通道介导的。通过通道的快速离子转运通常采用基于电导的公式进行建模,该公式根据电漂移而不是扩散来描述电流。相比之下,尽管基于漂移和扩散的电流更符合实际情况,并且能够显示出电导模型无法重现的实验可观察现象(例如整流),但它们在文献中并没有得到广泛应用。这两种公式在数学上是相关的:基于电导的电流是漂移扩散电流的线性近似。然而,膜电位的基于电导的模型并不是漂移扩散模型的一阶近似。分支分析和数值模拟表明,这两种方法在膜电位动力学中预测了定性和定量不同的行为。例如,具有相同离子通道种群的两个神经元膜模型,一个用基于电导的电流编写,另一个用漂移扩散电流编写,通过不同的机制和不同的刺激水平进入和退出重复振荡。这些兴奋性的差异是对兴奋性突触输入和不同离子通道表达水平的响应观察到的。一般来说,具有相同离子通道种群的基于漂移扩散和基于电导的模型的膜的电生理特征不同,可能导致用这些模型构建的网络的输入-输出和计算特性也不同。因此,漂移扩散公式被提议作为对基于电导模型的理论改进,这可能导致在单细胞和网络水平上对实验数据的更准确预测和解释。