• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氰基丙烯酸酯与激光治疗牙本质过敏症的比较:一项对照、随机、双盲、非劣效性临床试验。

Cyanoacrylate versus laser in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a controlled, randomized, double-masked and non-inferiority clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2013 Mar;84(3):287-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120165. Epub 2012 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2012.120165
PMID:22524329
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a painful, exaggerated response to normal stimuli, such as cold, sweetness, and brushing. The aim of the present controlled, randomized, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of cyanoacrylate in the treatment of DH when compared to the application of low-intensity laser.

METHODS

The study includes 434 sensitive teeth from 62 patients. A total of 216 teeth were treated with laser and 218 with cyanoacrylate. A numeric rating scale was used to record the parameters of pain related to the stimuli at baseline and after the treatment at intervals of 24 hours and 30, 90, and 180 days.

RESULTS

Both groups had significant reductions in DH. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups ≤6 months. Intragroup analysis showed that the effect of cyanoacrylate obtained at 24 hours remained for 90 days in response to air-jet test and 30 days for cold-spray test. There was a statistically significant difference between all other intragroup comparisons at the time intervals (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that cyanoacrylate is as effective as low-intensity laser in reducing DH. In addition, it is a more accessible and low-cost procedure and can be safely used in the treatment of DH.

摘要

背景

牙本质过敏症(DH)是一种对正常刺激(如冷、甜、刷牙)产生疼痛、过度反应的病症。本对照、随机、双盲、非劣效性临床试验旨在评估氰基丙烯酸酯治疗牙本质过敏症的有效性,与低强度激光应用相比。

方法

该研究共纳入 62 名患者的 434 颗敏感牙齿。共有 216 颗牙齿接受激光治疗,218 颗牙齿接受氰基丙烯酸酯治疗。使用数字评分量表记录基线时和治疗后 24 小时、30 天、90 天和 180 天与刺激相关的疼痛参数。

结果

两组患者的 DH 均有明显减轻。然而,两组患者在 ≤6 个月时无显著差异。组内分析显示,在空气喷溅试验中,氰基丙烯酸酯在 24 小时获得的效果可维持 90 天,而在冷喷试验中则可维持 30 天。在所有其他组内比较的时间间隔内均存在统计学显著差异(P <0.001)。

结论

氰基丙烯酸酯在减轻 DH 方面与低强度激光同样有效。此外,它是一种更容易获得且成本更低的治疗方法,可安全用于治疗 DH。

相似文献

1
Cyanoacrylate versus laser in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a controlled, randomized, double-masked and non-inferiority clinical trial.氰基丙烯酸酯与激光治疗牙本质过敏症的比较:一项对照、随机、双盲、非劣效性临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2013 Mar;84(3):287-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120165. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
2
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity With Cyanoacrylate and Laser.《用氰基丙烯酸酯和激光治疗牙本质过敏前后的口腔健康相关生活质量》
J Periodontol. 2017 Feb;88(2):166-172. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160216. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
3
Clinical evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG and GaAlAs laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: A randomized controlled clinical trial.临床评价 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光和 GaAlAs 激光治疗牙本质过敏症的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2011 Mar;39(3):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
4
Immediate efficacy of diode laser application in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized clinical trial.二极管激光应用于牙周维护期患者牙本质过敏治疗的即刻疗效:一项随机临床试验
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Aug;36(8):650-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01433.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
5
Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity with a low-level laser-emitting toothbrush: double-blind randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safety.使用低水平激光牙刷治疗牙本质过敏症:疗效与安全性的双盲随机临床试验
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Jul;41(7):523-31. doi: 10.1111/joor.12170. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
6
Long-term effect of diode laser irradiation compared to sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized controlled clinical study.与氟化钠清漆相比,二极管激光照射对牙周维护期患者牙本质过敏症的长期治疗效果:一项随机对照临床研究。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Nov;29(11):721-5. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2974. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
7
Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity using neodymium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Clinical evaluation.使用钕钇铝石榴石激光治疗颈部牙本质过敏症。临床评估。
Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(5):358-62. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10232.
8
Effectiveness of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dentine hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical trial.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光治疗牙本质过敏症的疗效:一项对照临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Apr;38(4):341-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01694.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
9
Clinical efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a dentifrice containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride compared to a dentifrice containing 8% strontium acetate and 1040 ppm fluoride under consumer usage conditions before and after switch-over.在消费者使用条件下,转换前后,与含有8%醋酸锶和1040 ppm氟化物的牙膏相比,含有8.0%精氨酸、碳酸钙和1450 ppm氟化物的牙膏在降低牙本质过敏方面的临床疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(4):128-38.
10
Efficacy of a commercial dentifrice containing 2% strontium chloride and 5% potassium nitrate for dentin hypersensitivity: a 3-day clinical study in adults in China.在中国成年人中进行的为期 3 天的临床研究显示,一种含有 2%氯化锶和 5%硝酸钾的商业牙膏对牙本质过敏症有效。
Clin Ther. 2012 Mar;34(3):614-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.027. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of photobiomodulation on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial.光生物调节对牙本质敏感的影响:一项随机对照双盲临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 24;29(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06149-z.
2
The effect of lasers in occlusion of dentinal tubules and reducing dentinal hypersensitivity, a scoping review.激光在封闭牙本质小管和减少牙本质敏感方面的作用:范围综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):1407. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05182-w.
3
Effect of Low- and High-Level Laser Therapy on the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: An Umbrella Review.
低强度和高强度激光疗法对牙本质过敏症治疗的影响:一项伞状综述
J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Aug 27;15:e41. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.41. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review.氰基丙烯酸酯治疗牙本质过敏症的有效性:一项系统评价
Int J Dent. 2023 Aug 23;2023:1465957. doi: 10.1155/2023/1465957. eCollection 2023.
5
The prevalence and predictive factors of dentine hypersensitivity among adults in Turkey.土耳其成年人牙本质敏感的患病率及其预测因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03137-1.
6
Comparison of Lasers and Desensitizing Agents in Dentinal Hypersensitivity Therapy.激光与脱敏剂在牙本质过敏症治疗中的比较
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;11(3):63. doi: 10.3390/dj11030063.
7
High-Intensity Red Light-Emitting Diode Irradiation Suppresses the Inflammatory Response of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells by Promoting Intracellular ATP Synthesis.高强度红光发光二极管照射通过促进细胞内ATP合成抑制人牙周膜干细胞的炎症反应。
Life (Basel). 2022 May 15;12(5):736. doi: 10.3390/life12050736.
8
Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低水平光疗法治疗牙本质过敏症的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6571-6595. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04183-1. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity.激光治疗牙本质过敏症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 13;7(7):CD009434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009434.pub2.
10
Laser Effects on the Prevention and Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review.激光对牙本质过敏症防治作用的系统评价
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Winter;10(1):1-11. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.01. Epub 2018 Dec 15.