Lotus Clinical Research LLC, Pasadena, California 91105, USA.
Pain Pract. 2012 Sep;12(7):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00556.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
This is the first study to compare plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV), oral (PO), or rectal (PR) formulations of acetaminophen.
Healthy male subjects (N = 6) were randomized to receive a single dose of IV (OFIRMEV(®) ; Cadence) 1,000 mg (15 minute infusion), PO (2 Tylenol(®) 500 mg caplets; McNeil Consumer Healthcare), or PR acetaminophen (2 Feverall(®) 650 mg suppositories; Actavis) with a 1-day washout period between doses. The 1,300 mg PR concentrations were standardized to 1,000 mg. Acetaminophen plasma and CSF levels were obtained at T0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours.
IV acetaminophen showed earlier and higher plasma and CSF levels compared with PO or PR administration. CSF bioavailability over 6 hours (AUC(0-6)) for IV, PO, and PR 1 g was 24.9, 14.2, and 10.3 μg·h/mL, respectively. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. One subject was replaced because of premature failure of his lumbar spinal catheter. The mean CSF level in the IV group was similar to plasma from 3 to 4 hours and higher from 4 hours on. Absorption phase, variability in plasma, and CSF were greater in PO and PR groups than variability with IV administration.
These results demonstrate that earlier and greater CSF penetration occurs as a result of the earlier and higher plasma peak with IV administration compared with PO or PR.
这是第一项比较对乙酰氨基酚静脉(IV)、口服(PO)或直肠(PR)制剂的血浆和脑脊液(CSF)药代动力学的研究。
健康男性受试者(N=6)随机接受单剂量 IV(OFIRMEV®;Cadence)1000mg(15 分钟输注)、PO(2 片泰诺(®)500mg 胶囊;McNeil Consumer Healthcare)或 PR 对乙酰氨基酚(2 片 Feverall(®)650mg 栓剂;Actavis),剂量之间有 1 天的洗脱期。1300mg PR 浓度标准化为 1000mg。在 T0、0.25、0.5、0.75、1、2、3、4 和 6 小时时获得对乙酰氨基酚的血浆和 CSF 水平。
与 PO 或 PR 给药相比,IV 对乙酰氨基酚显示出更早和更高的血浆和 CSF 水平。IV、PO 和 PR 1g 的 6 小时 CSF 生物利用度(AUC(0-6))分别为 24.9、14.2 和 10.3μg·h/mL。未报告与治疗相关的不良事件。由于他的腰椎脊髓导管过早失效,一名受试者被替换。IV 组的平均 CSF 水平与 3 至 4 小时的血浆相似,4 小时后更高。PO 和 PR 组的血浆和 CSF 吸收相、变异性大于 IV 给药的变异性。
这些结果表明,与 PO 或 PR 相比,IV 给药导致更早和更高的血浆峰值,从而更早和更高地穿透 CSF。