Medical Research Council Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Epidemiology, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Hypertension. 2012 Jun;59(6):1241-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.187039. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
We compared patterns of blood pressure (BP) change among normotensive women, women who developed gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, and women who had essential hypertension to examine how distinct these conditions are and whether rates of BP change may help to identify women at risk for hypertensive disorders. We used antenatal clinic BP measurements (median, 14 per woman) of 13016 women from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children who had a singleton or twin live birth surviving until ≥ 1 year. Linear spline models were used to describe changes in systolic and diastolic BPs in different periods of pregnancy (8-18, 18-30, 30-36, and ≥ 36 weeks' gestation). Women who had essential hypertension and those who developed gestational hypertension or preeclampsia had higher BP at 8 weeks' gestation (baseline) compared with normotensive women. The decrease in BP until 18 weeks was smaller in gestational hypertensive compared with normotensive pregnancies. BP rose more rapidly from 18 weeks onward in gestational hypertensive and preeclamptic pregnancies and from 30 weeks onward in essential hypertensive compared with normotensive pregnancies. Women who developed preeclampsia had a more rapid increase in BP from 30 weeks onward than those who developed gestational hypertension or had essential hypertension. Our findings indicate notable patterns of BP change that distinguish women with essential hypertension, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia from each other and from normotensive women, even from early pregnancy. These distinct patterns may be useful for identifying women at risk of developing a hypertensive disorder later in pregnancy.
我们比较了正常血压女性、发生妊娠期高血压或子痫前期的女性以及患有原发性高血压的女性血压变化模式,以检验这些情况有何不同,以及血压变化率是否有助于识别有发生妊娠高血压疾病风险的女性。我们使用了来自阿冯纵向父母和儿童研究的 13016 名单胎或双胎活产且存活至≥ 1 岁的女性的产前诊所血压测量值(中位数为每女性 14 次)。线性样条模型用于描述不同妊娠时期(8-18、18-30、30-36 和≥ 36 周妊娠)收缩压和舒张压的变化。与正常血压女性相比,患有原发性高血压的女性和发生妊娠期高血压或子痫前期的女性在 8 周妊娠(基线)时血压更高。与正常血压妊娠相比,妊娠期高血压女性的血压在 18 周前下降幅度较小。从 18 周开始,妊娠期高血压和子痫前期女性的血压上升更快,从 30 周开始,原发性高血压女性的血压上升更快,而正常血压女性则没有。与发生妊娠期高血压的女性相比,发生子痫前期的女性从 30 周开始血压上升更快。我们的研究结果表明,血压变化的显著模式可以区分原发性高血压、妊娠期高血压和子痫前期女性与正常血压女性之间的差异,甚至可以从早期妊娠开始。这些不同的模式可能有助于识别在妊娠后期有发生妊娠高血压疾病风险的女性。