Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2220-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2343-2. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
Quality of health care and safety have been emphasized by various professional and governmental groups. However, no standardized method exists for grading and reporting complications in orthopaedic surgery. Conclusions regarding outcomes are incomplete without a standardized, objective complication grading scheme applied concurrently. The general surgery literature has the Clavien-Dindo classification that meets the above criteria.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether a previously reported classification would show high intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities when modified for orthopaedic surgery specifically looking at hip preservation surgery. We therefore determined the interreader and intrareader reliabilities of the adapted classification scheme as applied to hip preservation surgery.
We adapted the validated Clavien-Dindo complication classification system and tested its reliability for orthopaedic surgery, specifically hip preservation surgery. There are five grades based on the treatment required to manage the complication and the potential for long-term morbidity. Forty-four complication scenarios were created from a prospective multicenter database of hip preservation procedures and from the literature. Ten readers who perform hip surgery at eight centers in three countries graded the scenarios at two different times. Fleiss' and Cohen's κ statistics were performed for interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities, respectively.
The overall Fleiss' κ value for interobserver reliability was 0.887 (95% CI, 0.855-0.891). The weighted κ was 0.925 (95% CI, 0.894-0.956) for Grade I, 0.838 (95% CI, 0.807-0.869) for Grade II, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.835-0.866) for Grade III, and 0.898 (95% CI, 0.866-0.929) for Grade IV. The Cohen's κ value for intraobserver reliability was 0.891 (95% CI, 0.857-0.925).
The adapted classification system shows high interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities for grading of complications when applied to orthopaedic surgery looking at complications of hip preservation surgery. This grading scheme may facilitate standardization of complication reporting and make outcome studies more comparable.
医疗质量和安全已受到各种专业和政府团体的重视。然而,目前还没有一种标准化的方法来对矫形外科手术中的并发症进行分级和报告。如果没有应用标准化的、客观的并发症分级方案,就无法得出完整的结论。普通外科文献中有符合上述标准的 Clavien-Dindo 分级。
问题/目的:我们想知道,当我们对其进行特别针对髋关节保留手术的修改后,之前报告的分类是否会显示出高的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。因此,我们确定了经过修改的分类方案在应用于髋关节保留手术时的读者间和读者内可靠性。
我们改编了经过验证的 Clavien-Dindo 并发症分类系统,并对其在矫形外科手术中的可靠性进行了测试,特别是髋关节保留手术。根据处理并发症所需的治疗方法和潜在的长期发病率,该系统分为五个等级。从髋关节保留手术的前瞻性多中心数据库和文献中创建了 44 个并发症场景。10 位在三个国家的 8 个中心进行髋关节手术的读者在两次不同的时间对这些场景进行了分级。分别使用 Fleiss 和 Cohen 的κ统计量来评估观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。
观察者间可靠性的总体 Fleiss κ 值为 0.887(95%CI,0.855-0.891)。加权 κ 值为 0.925(95%CI,0.894-0.956)用于 I 级,0.838(95%CI,0.807-0.869)用于 II 级,0.87(95%CI,0.835-0.866)用于 III 级,0.898(95%CI,0.866-0.929)用于 IV 级。观察者内可靠性的 Cohen κ 值为 0.891(95%CI,0.857-0.925)。
当应用于矫形外科手术,特别是髋关节保留手术的并发症分级时,改良后的分类系统具有较高的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。这种分级方案可能有助于并发症报告的标准化,并使结果研究更具可比性。