• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“但这对我意味着什么?”初级保健患者对检查结果通知的沟通偏好。

"But what does it mean for me?" Primary care patients' communication preferences for test results notification.

作者信息

Elder Nancy C, Barney Kelley

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Apr;38(4):168-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38022-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38022-7
PMID:22533129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The best ways to communicate test results in primary care to achieve patient satisfaction and assist patients to incorporate results into their personal health decision making are unknown. A study was conducted to determine the factors that patients believe are important in achieving those goals.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 12 adults, at least half with a chronic disease requiring regular testing, who shared experiences about receiving test results from physicians' offices and how they used them in their health decision making. In addition, "think aloud" interviewing techniques were used to assess participants' satisfaction and stated understanding with six different formats for receiving a hypothetical test result (a mildly elevated lipid profile). The interviews were analyzed using the editing technique to determine important factors in test results notification.

FINDINGS

Three themes were found to be important in satisfaction with and stated understanding and use of test results: (1) the information shared (test result, clinician interpretation and guidance), (2) significance of the results (testing purpose, abnormal or normal result) and (3) personal preferences for communication (timeliness, interpersonal connection, and hard copy). Participants' stated understanding was highest, among several potential formats, for actual values with desired/normal values, a low-literacy description of the test's purpose, and a simple graph.

CONCLUSIONS

A results notification algorithm includes (1) communication elements (the purpose of the test, the actual results with desired values, clinician guidance, and a graphical representation) and (2) appropriate choice of notification technique (phone/visit for diagnostic tests and all significantly abnormal results and mail/e-mail/Web for all others).

摘要

背景

在初级保健中传达检查结果以实现患者满意度并帮助患者将结果纳入个人健康决策的最佳方法尚不清楚。开展了一项研究以确定患者认为对实现这些目标很重要的因素。

方法

对12名成年人的便利样本进行了半结构化访谈,其中至少一半患有需要定期检查的慢性病,他们分享了从医生办公室收到检查结果的经历以及他们如何在健康决策中使用这些结果。此外,采用“边想边说”的访谈技巧来评估参与者对六种不同格式接收假设检查结果(轻度升高的血脂水平)的满意度和陈述的理解。使用编辑技术对访谈进行分析,以确定检查结果通知中的重要因素。

结果

发现三个主题对于对检查结果的满意度、陈述的理解和使用很重要:(1)共享的信息(检查结果、临床医生的解释和指导),(2)结果的重要性(检查目的、异常或正常结果)以及(3)沟通的个人偏好(及时性、人际联系和纸质副本)。在几种潜在格式中,参与者对实际值与期望/正常值、对检查目的的低识字率描述以及简单图表的陈述理解最高。

结论

结果通知算法包括(1)沟通要素(检查目的、带有期望值的实际结果、临床医生指导和图形表示)以及(2)通知技术的适当选择(诊断检查和所有明显异常结果通过电话/就诊,其他所有结果通过邮件/电子邮件/网络)。

相似文献

1
"But what does it mean for me?" Primary care patients' communication preferences for test results notification.“但这对我意味着什么?”初级保健患者对检查结果通知的沟通偏好。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Apr;38(4):168-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38022-7.
2
Patient preferences for and satisfaction with methods of communicating test results in a primary care practice.初级医疗实践中患者对检查结果沟通方式的偏好及满意度。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Oct;35(10):497-501. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35068-0.
3
Patients' preferences for biopsy result notification in an era of electronic messaging methods.在电子信息传递方式时代,患者对活检结果通知方式的偏好。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 May;151(5):513-21. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5634.
4
Patient preferences and physician practices for laboratory test results notification.患者对实验室检查结果通知的偏好和医生的做法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):670-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090078.
5
Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification.患者对检查结果通知的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1651-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3344-0.
6
Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative.患者对正常实验室检查结果通知方式的偏好:来自ASIPS协作组的报告
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Mar 8;6(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-11.
7
Understanding health care communication preferences of veteran primary care users.了解退伍军人初级保健用户的医疗保健沟通偏好。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):420-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
8
Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication.自动化检验结果管理系统对患者检验结果沟通满意度的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12;167(20):2233-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.20.2233.
9
Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study.初级保健中患者对检查结果沟通的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e133-40. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683929.
10
Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification.患者对实验室检查结果通知的偏好。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Dec;6(12):1297-300.

引用本文的文献

1
What do women want to see in a personalized breast cancer risk report? A qualitative study of Asian women of two countries.女性希望在个性化乳腺癌风险报告中看到什么?对两个国家亚洲女性的定性研究。
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):517-528. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00735-6. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Enhancing Patient Understanding of Laboratory Test Results: Systematic Review of Presentation Formats and Their Impact on Perception, Decision, Action, and Memory.增强患者对实验室检验结果的理解:呈现格式及其对感知、决策、行动和记忆影响的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 12;26:e53993. doi: 10.2196/53993.
3
User-Centered System Design for Communicating Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Design and Evaluation Study.
以用户为中心的临床检验结果沟通系统设计:设计与评估研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Nov 25;8(4):e26017. doi: 10.2196/26017.
4
Communicating Test Results from a General Health Check: Preferences from a Discrete Choice Experiment Survey.一般健康检查结果的沟通:来自离散选择实验调查的偏好。
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):649-660. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00512-4. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
Patient Challenges and Needs in Comprehending Laboratory Test Results: Mixed Methods Study.患者理解实验室检查结果的挑战和需求:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 7;22(12):e18725. doi: 10.2196/18725.
6
A Systematic Review of Patient-Facing Visualizations of Personal Health Data.个人健康数据患者可视化的系统评价
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):751-770. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697592. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.通过信件、电话或亲自沟通癌症筛查结果:对参与者焦虑、理解和偏好影响的混合方法系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 29;13:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.016. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
A Patient-Facing Diabetes Dashboard Embedded in a Patient Web Portal: Design Sprint and Usability Testing.嵌入患者门户网站的面向患者的糖尿病信息仪表板:设计冲刺与可用性测试
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Sep 24;5(3):e26. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9569.
9
Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals.在线门户中以患者为中心的检测结果显示界面设计方法。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Jun 26;6(1):15. doi: 10.5334/egems.255.
10
Presentation of laboratory test results in patient portals: influence of interface design on risk interpretation and visual search behaviour.患者门户中实验室检验结果的呈现:界面设计对风险解读和视觉搜索行为的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Feb 12;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0589-7.