Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G, Andremont A, Buu-Hoi A, Ourbak P, Galicier C, Veron M, Boisivon A, Bouvier A M
Laboratoire de Bacteriologie, Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2520-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2520-2525.1990.
To determine the incidence rate of complications associated with vascular catheters in intensive care unit patients and to analyze risk factors for a positive vascular culture, we performed a multicenter study of intensive care unit patients at eight French hospitals. During the study period, 865 intravenous catheters were inserted in 566 patients; 362 (41.8%) were peripheral catheters, and 503 (58.2%) were central catheters. Local complications (i.e., infiltration) occurred significantly more often with peripheral than with central catheters (P less than 0.001); in contrast, fever and bacteremia were significantly more often associated with central than with peripheral catheters (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively). The culture of the vascular-catheter tip was positive for 24% of central catheters (32 of 1,000 catheters days) and for 9% of peripheral catheters (21 of 1,000 catheters days). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common microorganism isolated from both peripheral and central catheters, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. No significant risk factor associated with positive cultures for peripheral catheters was found by univariate analysis. In contrast, the purpose of the cannula (nutrition and monitoring of central venous pressure), the insertion site (jugular), the dressing type (semipermeable transparent dressing), the antiseptic used to prepare the insertion site (povidone iodine), and routine changing of the intravenous administration set were significantly associated with positive cultures of central catheters. Three factors, duration of catheterization, use of a semipermeable transparent dressing, and the jugular insertion site, were found to be independently associated with positive cultures of central catheters by multivariate analysis.
为确定重症监护病房患者血管导管相关并发症的发生率,并分析血管培养阳性的危险因素,我们对法国8家医院的重症监护病房患者进行了一项多中心研究。在研究期间,566例患者共插入865根静脉导管;其中362根(41.8%)为外周导管,503根(58.2%)为中心静脉导管。外周导管局部并发症(即浸润)的发生率显著高于中心静脉导管(P<0.001);相反,发热和菌血症与中心静脉导管的相关性显著高于外周导管(分别为P<0.01和P<0.05)。血管导管尖端培养显示,24%的中心静脉导管阳性(1000导管日中的32根),9%的外周导管阳性(1000导管日中的21根)。表皮葡萄球菌是从外周导管和中心静脉导管中分离出的最常见微生物,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。单因素分析未发现与外周导管培养阳性相关的显著危险因素。相比之下,插管目的(营养和中心静脉压监测)、插入部位(颈内静脉)、敷料类型(半透性透明敷料)、用于准备插入部位的消毒剂(聚维酮碘)以及静脉输液装置的常规更换与中心静脉导管培养阳性显著相关。多因素分析发现,导管留置时间、使用半透性透明敷料和颈内静脉插入部位这三个因素与中心静脉导管培养阳性独立相关。