• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球支气管扩张剂反应性模式:来自阻塞性肺疾病负担研究的结果。

Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study.

机构信息

University of British Columbia, UBC iCapture Centre for CardioPulmonary Research, St Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Thorax. 2012 Aug;67(8):718-26. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445. Epub 2012 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445
PMID:22544896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3402754/
Abstract

RATIONALE

Criteria for a clinically significant bronchodilator response (BDR) are mainly based on studies in patients with obstructive lung diseases. Little is known about the BDR in healthy general populations, and even less about the worldwide patterns.

METHODS

10 360 adults aged 40 years and older from 14 countries in North America, Europe, Africa and Asia participated in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Spirometry was used before and after an inhaled bronchodilator to determine the distribution of the BDR in population-based samples of healthy non-smokers and individuals with airflow obstruction.

RESULTS

In 3922 healthy never smokers, the weighted pooled estimate of the 95th percentiles (95% CI) for bronchodilator response were 284 ml (263 to 305) absolute change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline (ΔFEV(1)); 12.0% (11.2% to 12.8%) change relative to initial value (%ΔFEV(1i)); and 10.0% (9.5% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (%ΔFEV(1p)). The corresponding mean changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) were 322 ml (271 to 373) absolute change from baseline (ΔFVC); 10.5% (8.9% to 12.0%) change relative to initial value (ΔFVC(i)); and 9.2% (7.9% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (ΔFVC(p)). The proportion who exceeded the above threshold values in the subgroup with spirometrically defined Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 2 and higher (FEV(1)/FVC <0.7 and FEV(1)% predicted <80%) were 11.1%, 30.8% and 12.9% respectively for the FEV(1)-based thresholds and 22.6%, 28.6% and 22.1% respectively for the FVC-based thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide reference values for bronchodilator responses worldwide that confirm guideline estimates for a clinically significant level of BDR in bronchodilator testing.

摘要

背景

临床上有意义的支气管扩张剂反应(BDR)的标准主要基于阻塞性肺疾病患者的研究。关于健康人群中 BDR 的情况知之甚少,而全球范围内的模式则更少。

方法

北美、欧洲、非洲和亚洲 14 个国家的 10360 名年龄在 40 岁及以上的成年人参加了负担性阻塞性肺病研究。在使用吸入性支气管扩张剂前后进行肺量测定,以确定基于人群的健康非吸烟者和气流阻塞个体中 BDR 的分布。

结果

在 3922 名健康的从不吸烟者中,用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV1)从基线的 95%百分位(95%CI)的加权总体估计值为 284ml(263 至 305)绝对变化量;与初始值相比的 12.0%(11.2%至 12.8%)变化量(%ΔFEV1i);与预测值相比的 10.0%(9.5%至 10.5%)变化量(%ΔFEV1p)。用力肺活量(FVC)的相应平均变化量为 322ml(271 至 373)绝对变化量,与基线相比(ΔFVC);与初始值相比的 10.5%(8.9%至 12.0%)变化量(ΔFVCi);与预测值相比的 9.2%(7.9%至 10.5%)变化量(ΔFVCp)。在以 spirometrically 定义的全球倡议慢性阻塞性肺疾病(GOLD)阶段 2 及更高阶段(FEV1/FVC<0.7 和 FEV1%预测值<80%)为亚组中,超过上述阈值的比例分别为 11.1%、30.8%和 12.9%,用于 FEV1 为基础的阈值,分别为 22.6%、28.6%和 22.1%,用于 FVC 为基础的阈值。

结论

这些结果为全球范围内的支气管扩张剂反应提供了参考值,证实了指南中关于支气管扩张剂检测中具有临床意义的 BDR 水平的估计值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/1e06e094469e/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/f5423d6c2c15/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/6cf1db1d705e/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/badc749ca5d1/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/f03e82436518/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/7fa983d9ab8f/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/1e06e094469e/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/f5423d6c2c15/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/6cf1db1d705e/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/badc749ca5d1/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/f03e82436518/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/7fa983d9ab8f/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be6a/3402754/1e06e094469e/thoraxjnl-2011-201445fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study.全球支气管扩张剂反应性模式:来自阻塞性肺疾病负担研究的结果。
Thorax. 2012 Aug;67(8):718-26. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
2
Combined Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second and Forced Vital Capacity Bronchodilator Response, Exacerbations, and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的支气管扩张剂反应、慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重和死亡率的关系。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):826-835. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-601OC.
3
Bronchodilator Response in FVC Is Larger and More Relevant Than in FEV in Severe Airflow Obstruction.在严重气流受限患者中,用力肺活量(FVC)的支气管扩张剂反应比第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)更大且更具相关性。
Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1088-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.017. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Estimating the U.S. prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2010.使用支气管扩张剂前后的肺量测定法估计美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病的流行率:国家健康和营养调查(NHANES)2007-2010。
Respir Res. 2013 Oct 9;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-103.
5
A New Bronchodilator Response Grading Strategy Identifies Distinct Patient Populations.一种新的支气管扩张剂反应分级策略可识别不同的患者群体。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Dec;16(12):1504-1517. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201901-030OC.
6
The forgotten message from gold: FVC is a primary clinical outcome measure of bronchodilator reversibility in COPD.来自黄金标准的被遗忘的信息:用力肺活量(FVC)是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中支气管扩张剂可逆性的主要临床结局指标。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Oct;21(5):767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 May 6.
7
Flow and volume responses after routine salbutamol reversibility testing in mild to very severe COPD.轻至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者常规沙丁胺醇可逆性试验后的气流和容积反应
Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.09.024. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
8
Bronchodilator responsiveness as a phenotypic characteristic of established chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.支气管扩张剂反应性作为已确诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病的一种表型特征。
Thorax. 2012 Aug;67(8):701-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201458. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
9
What defines abnormal lung function in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?慢性阻塞性肺疾病老年患者的异常肺功能是如何定义的?
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(9):717-28. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825090-00001.
10
Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Tobacco-Exposed People With or Without COPD.吸烟人群中无论是否患有 COPD,支气管扩张剂的反应性。
Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):502-514. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Bronchodilator Response in Patients with CF and Non-CF Bronchiectasis-A Randomized Controlled Study.囊性纤维化和非囊性纤维化支气管扩张患者支气管扩张剂反应的评估——一项随机对照研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4778. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134778.
2
Evaluation of recently proposed thresholds to define spirometry bronchodilator response.评估最近提出的用于定义肺量计支气管扩张剂反应的阈值。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 16;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.01162-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Physiological Small Airways Dysfunction and the Bronchodilator Response in Adults With Asthma and Its Risk Factors: A Retrospective Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD.COPD 患者 1 秒用力呼气容积随时间的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 29;365(13):1184-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105482. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
2
Bronchodilator reversibility in COPD.COPD 的支气管扩张剂可逆性。
Chest. 2011 Oct;140(4):1055-1063. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2974.
3
The volumetric response to bronchodilators in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病对支气管扩张剂的容量反应
成人哮喘患者的生理性小气道功能障碍及其支气管扩张剂反应及其危险因素:一项回顾性分析。
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Mar 6;18:377-389. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S489893. eCollection 2025.
4
New spirometry recommendations from the Brazilian Thoracic Association - 2024 update.巴西胸科协会的新肺量计建议——2024年更新版。
J Bras Pneumol. 2025 Jan 20;50(6):e20240169. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240169. eCollection 2025.
5
Prevalence of Bronchodilator Responsiveness: A Comparison of Old Versus New Criteria.支气管扩张剂反应性的流行率:新旧标准的比较。
Respir Care. 2024 Sep 26;69(10):1266-1274. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11603.
6
Race-Neutral Equations and Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation in Two Pediatric Cohorts.种族中立方程与两种儿科队列肺功能测试解读。
J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;273:114124. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114124. Epub 2024 May 28.
7
Clinical features and 1-year outcomes of variable obstruction in participants with preserved spirometry: results from the ECOPD study in China.在肺功能正常的 COPD 患者中可变气流受限的临床特征和 1 年转归:来自中国 ECOPD 研究的结果。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 24;11(1):e002210. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002210.
8
[Asthma].[哮喘]
Open Respir Arch. 2024 Apr 5;6(2):100324. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100324. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
9
Eosinophilic Patterns in Patients with Seasonal Allergy Affected by Bronchial Asthma and Rhinitis/Rhinosinusitis: Efficacy of Benralizumab in Patients with the Persistent Pattern.季节性过敏合并支气管哮喘和鼻炎/鼻-鼻窦炎患者的嗜酸性粒细胞模式:贝那利珠单抗对持续性模式患者的疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 28;13(3):754. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030754.
10
A comparative study of bronchodilator response: utilizing pre-bronchodilator versus predicted normal values.支气管扩张剂反应的比较研究:使用支气管扩张剂前值与预测正常值。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02859-4.
COPD. 2008 Jun;5(3):147-52. doi: 10.1080/15412550802092928.
4
FEV1 response to bronchodilation in an adult urban population.成年城市人口中支气管扩张对第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的反应。
Chest. 2008 Aug;134(2):387-393. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2207. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
5
Bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的支气管扩张剂反应性
Eur Respir J. 2008 Apr;31(4):742-50. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00129607. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
6
International variation in the prevalence of COPD (the BOLD Study): a population-based prevalence study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病率的国际差异(BOLD研究):一项基于人群的患病率研究。
Lancet. 2007 Sep 1;370(9589):741-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61377-4.
7
The Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Initiative (BOLD): rationale and design.慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担研究计划(BOLD):基本原理与设计
COPD. 2005 Jun;2(2):277-83.
8
Flow and volume responses after routine salbutamol reversibility testing in mild to very severe COPD.轻至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者常规沙丁胺醇可逆性试验后的气流和容积反应
Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.09.024. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
Interpretative strategies for lung function tests.肺功能测试的解读策略。
Eur Respir J. 2005 Nov;26(5):948-68. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205.
10
Bronchodilator reversibility testing in an adult general population; the importance of smoking and anthropometrical variables on the response to a beta2-agonist.成年普通人群中的支气管扩张剂可逆性测试;吸烟和人体测量学变量对β2激动剂反应的重要性。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2006;19(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Sep 19.