Toral Natacha, Slater Betzabeth
Nutrition Department, Health Sciences School, University of Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, 70910-900 Brasília, DF, Brazil.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:174640. doi: 10.1100/2012/174640. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
To assess the impact of a six-month stage-based intervention on fruit and vegetable intake, regarding perceived benefits and barriers, and self-efficacy among adolescents.
Randomized treatment-control, pre-post design.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: Schools were randomized between control and experimental groups. 860 adolescents from ten public schools in Brasília, Federal District, Brazil were evaluated at baseline; 771 (81%) completed the study.
Experimental group received monthly magazines and newsletters aimed at promotion of healthy eating.
Self-reported fruit and vegetable intake, stages of change, self-efficacy and decisional balance scores were evaluated at baseline and post-intervention in both groups.
The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated using the analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) and repeated measurement analysis by means of weighted least squares. Comparison between the proportions of adolescents who advanced through the stages during the intervention was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.
After adjusting for sex and age, study variables showed no modifications through the proposed intervention. There was no statistical difference in participant mobility in the intervention and control groups between the stages of change, throughout the study.
A nutritional intervention based exclusively on distribution of stage-matched printed educational materials was insufficient to change adolescents' dietary behavior.
评估一项为期六个月的分阶段干预措施对青少年水果和蔬菜摄入量、感知到的益处与障碍以及自我效能的影响。
随机治疗对照前后测设计。
研究对象/研究地点:学校被随机分为对照组和实验组。对巴西联邦区巴西利亚十所公立学校的860名青少年进行了基线评估;771名(81%)完成了研究。
实验组每月收到旨在促进健康饮食的杂志和时事通讯。
在两组的基线和干预后,评估自我报告的水果和蔬菜摄入量、改变阶段、自我效能和决策平衡得分。
使用协方差分析模型(ANCOVA)和加权最小二乘法的重复测量分析来评估干预措施的有效性。使用Mantel-Haenszel卡方检验对干预期间在各阶段取得进展的青少年比例进行比较。
在对性别和年龄进行调整后,研究变量未因所提议的干预措施而发生改变。在整个研究过程中,干预组和对照组在改变阶段的参与者进展情况没有统计学差异。
仅基于分发与阶段匹配的印刷教育材料的营养干预不足以改变青少年的饮食行为。