RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 30;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-61.
Familism and parental respect are culturally derived constructs rooted in Hispanic and Asian cultures, respectively. Measures of these constructs have been utilized in research and found to predict delays in substance use initiation and reduced levels of use. However, given that these measures are explicitly designed to tap constructs that are considered important by different racial/ethnic groups, there is a risk that the measurement properties may not be equivalent across groups.
This study evaluated the measurement equivalence of measures of familism and parental respect in a large and diverse sample of middle school students in Southern California (n = 5646) using a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis approach.
Results showed little evidence of measurement variance across four racial/ethnic groups (African American, Hispanic, Asian, and non-Hispanic White), supporting the continued use of these measures in diverse populations. Some differences between latent variable means were identified - specifically that the Hispanic group and the white group differed on familism.
No evidence of invariance was found. However, the item distributions were highly positively skewed, indicating a tendency for youth to endorse the most positive response, which may reduce the reliability of the measures and suggests that refinement is possible.
家庭主义和父母尊重分别是根植于西班牙裔和亚裔文化的文化衍生概念。这些概念的测量方法已在研究中得到应用,并发现它们可以预测物质使用的延迟和使用水平的降低。然而,由于这些测量方法是专门设计用来衡量不同种族/族裔群体认为重要的概念,因此存在一个风险,即这些测量方法在不同群体之间的测量特性可能不一致。
本研究使用多组验证性因子分析方法,在加利福尼亚州南部的一个大型和多样化的中学生样本(n=5646)中,评估了家庭主义和父母尊重测量方法的测量等效性。
结果表明,在四个种族/族裔群体(非裔美国人、西班牙裔、亚裔和非西班牙裔白人)之间,测量方差几乎没有差异,支持在不同人群中继续使用这些测量方法。还确定了潜在变量均值之间的一些差异——具体来说,西班牙裔群体和白人群体在家庭主义方面存在差异。
没有发现不变性的证据。然而,项目分布高度正偏态,表明年轻人倾向于赞同最积极的回答,这可能会降低测量方法的可靠性,并表明可能需要进行改进。