• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰贫困地区的年轻人能接受衣原体筛查吗?2008 年英格兰国家衣原体筛查规划实施的基线分析。

Will chlamydia screening reach young people in deprived areas in England? Baseline analysis of the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme delivery in 2008.

机构信息

HIV & STI Department, Health Protection Services, Colindale, Health Protection Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Aug;38(8):677-84. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31821597ca.

DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31821597ca
PMID:21844718
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) was established in England to control chlamydia in people <25 years. This study examined variations in NCSP delivery in 2008, its first full year of national coverage, by comparing the distribution of screening venues and coverage with the risk of testing positive in men and women by socioeconomic circumstances (SEC) and age.

METHODS

A total of 550,000 NCSP screening records from 2008 were linked to the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007. NCSP provision (venues/1000 population aged 13-24 years) was examined by SEC. NCSP coverage (tests/target population) and chlamydial positivity (positive results/[positive + negative results]) were examined separately in men and women by SEC and age. Odds ratios for positivity were calculated, adjusted for socioeconomic quintile, age, ethnicity, behavior, and screening provider.

RESULTS

NCSP coverage was just 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0-4.1) in men and 9.6% (95% CI: 9.5-9.6) in women. Screening provision and coverage were highest in more socioeconomically deprived areas where chlamydia positivity was also highest. The adjusted odds for testing positive in the most deprived areas was 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.5) times higher in men and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.4-1.5) times higher in women than the least deprived areas.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first year in which all areas delivered screening, the NCSP's total coverage was low, particularly in men. However, coverage was higher in deprived populations, who were also at increased risk of testing positive for infection. This analysis provides a baseline by which to monitor social variations in NCSP delivery as coverage expands.

摘要

背景

英国国家衣原体筛查计划(NCSP)成立的目的是控制 25 岁以下人群的衣原体感染。本研究比较了 2008 年(NCSP 全面开展的第一年)筛查场所的分布和覆盖情况与按社会经济状况(SEC)和年龄划分的男性和女性阳性检测率,以此评估该计划的实施情况。

方法

将 2008 年的 55 万例 NCSP 筛查记录与 2007 年的多因素剥夺指数(Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007)相关联。按 SEC 评估 NCSP 的提供情况(13-24 岁人群中每 1000 人拥有的筛查场所数)。分别按 SEC 和年龄在男性和女性中评估 NCSP 的覆盖情况(目标人群中的检测数/[阳性检测数+阴性检测数])和衣原体阳性率(阳性结果数/[阳性结果数+阴性结果数])。对优势比(odds ratio)进行计算,同时调整社会经济五分位数、年龄、种族、行为和筛查提供方。

结果

男性的 NCSP 覆盖率仅为 4.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:4.0-4.1),女性为 9.6%(95% CI:9.5-9.6)。在社会经济较贫困地区,筛查提供和覆盖情况最好,而衣原体阳性率也最高。在最贫困地区,男性和女性阳性检测的调整优势比(adjusted odds ratio)分别比最富裕地区高 1.4 倍(95% CI:1.3-1.5)和 1.4 倍(95% CI:1.4-1.5)。

结论

在所有地区开展筛查的第一年,NCSP 的总体覆盖率很低,尤其是在男性中。然而,在感染风险较高的贫困人群中,覆盖率较高。该分析为监测 NCSP 覆盖面扩大时社会差异提供了基线。

相似文献

1
Will chlamydia screening reach young people in deprived areas in England? Baseline analysis of the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme delivery in 2008.英格兰贫困地区的年轻人能接受衣原体筛查吗?2008 年英格兰国家衣原体筛查规划实施的基线分析。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Aug;38(8):677-84. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31821597ca.
2
Monitoring inequalities in the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: added value of ACORN, a commercial geodemographic classification tool.监测英格兰国家衣原体筛查计划中的不平等现象:商业地理人口分类工具ACORN的附加价值
Sex Health. 2009 Mar;6(1):57-62. doi: 10.1071/sh08036.
3
Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.在英格兰建立全国衣原体筛查计划:首个完整筛查年度的结果
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):335-41. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.012856.
4
Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010.英格兰 2006 年至 2010 年沙眼衣原体互联网检测。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 19;12:1095. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095.
5
Screening for gonorrhoea using samples collected through the English national chlamydia screening programme and risk of false positives: a national survey of local authorities.利用通过英国国家衣原体筛查计划收集的样本进行淋病筛查及假阳性风险:一项针对地方当局的全国性调查
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 16;4(10):e006067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006067.
6
Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy.英国的衣原体筛查:政策背后的叙事定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 30;12:317. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-317.
7
Who is being tested by the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme? A comparison with national probability survey data.英国国家衣原体筛查计划对哪些人进行了检测?与全国概率调查数据的比较。
Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Jun;87(4):306-11. doi: 10.1136/sti.2010.047027. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
8
Changes in chlamydia prevalence and duration of infection estimated from testing and diagnosis rates in England: a model-based analysis using surveillance data, 2000-15.基于监测数据的英格兰基于检测和诊断率估计的衣原体流行率和感染持续时间变化:模型分析,2000-15 年。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jun;3(6):e271-e278. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30071-9.
9
The implementation of chlamydia screening: a cross-sectional study in the south east of England.沙眼衣原体筛查的实施:英格兰东南部的一项横断面研究。
Sex Transm Infect. 2010 Jun;86(3):217-21. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.037283. Epub 2010 May 10.
10
Do sexual health campaigns work? An outcome evaluation of a media campaign to increase chlamydia testing among young people aged 15-24 in England.性健康宣传活动有效吗?一项针对英国15至24岁年轻人增加衣原体检测的媒体宣传活动的结果评估。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 17;13:484. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-484.

引用本文的文献

1
Early detection of type 2 diabetes in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Stockholm - comparing reach of community and facility-based screening.斯德哥尔摩社会经济弱势地区 2 型糖尿病的早期发现——比较社区和机构筛查的覆盖面。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1795439. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1795439.
2
Understanding the burden of bacterial sexually transmitted infections and Trichomonas vaginalis among black Caribbeans in the United Kingdom: Findings from a systematic review.了解英国黑人加勒比群体中细菌性性传播感染和阴道毛滴虫的负担:系统评价的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208315. eCollection 2018.
3
Socioeconomic factors and other sources of variation in the prevalence of genital chlamydia infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
社会经济因素及生殖器衣原体感染患病率的其他变异来源:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:729. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2069-7.
4
The added value of chlamydia screening between 2008-2010 in reaching young people in addition to chlamydia testing in regular care; an observational study.2008 - 2010年间衣原体筛查除了在常规护理中进行衣原体检测外,在覆盖年轻人方面的附加价值:一项观察性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 18;14:612. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0612-2.
5
Prevalence of chlamydia in young adulthood and association with life course socioeconomic position: birth cohort study.年轻成年期衣原体感染率及其与生命历程社会经济地位的关联:出生队列研究
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 25;9(8):e104943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104943. eCollection 2014.
6
Inequalities in the incidence of infectious disease in the North East of England: a population-based study.英格兰东北部传染病发病率的不平等现象:一项基于人群的研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Jan;143(1):189-201. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814000533. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
The effect of financial incentives on chlamydia testing rates: evidence from a randomized experiment.经济激励对衣原体检测率的影响:一项随机实验的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;105(100):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
8
Young men's views toward the barriers and facilitators of Internet-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening: qualitative study.年轻男性对基于互联网的沙眼衣原体筛查的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 3;15(12):e265. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2628.