• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤中心质量改进:烧伤治疗结果是否取决于收治机构,以及是否存在一个量-效“甜蜜点”?

Burn-center quality improvement: are burn outcomes dependent on admitting facilities and is there a volume-outcome "sweet-spot"?

作者信息

Hranjec Tjasa, Turrentine Florence E, Stukenborg George, Young Jeffrey S, Sawyer Robert G, Calland James F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):559-66.

PMID:22546129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3374848/
Abstract

Risk factors of mortality in burn patients such as inhalation injury, patient age, and percent of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned have been identified in previous publications. However, little is known about the variability of mortality outcomes between burn centers and whether the admitting facilities or facility volumes can be recognized as predictors of mortality. De-identified data from 87,665 acute burn observations obtained from the National Burn Repository between 2003 and 2007 were used to estimate a multivariable logistic regression model that could predict patient mortality with reference to the admitting burn facility/facility volume, adjusted for differences in age, inhalation injury, %TBSA burned, and an additional factor, percent full thickness burn (%FTB). As previously reported, all three covariates (%TBSA burned, inhalation injury, and age) were found to be highly statistically significant risk factors of mortality in burn patients (P value < 0.0001). The additional variable, %FTB, was also found to be a statistically significant determinant, although it did not greatly improve the multivariable model. The treatment/admitting facility was found to be an independent mortality predictor, with certain hospitals having increased odds of death and others showing a protective effect (decreased odds ratio). Hospitals with high burn volumes had the highest risk of mortality. Mortality outcomes of patients with similar risk factors (%TBSA burned, inhalation injury, age, and %FTB) are significantly affected by the treating facility and their admission volumes.

摘要

烧伤患者死亡的风险因素,如吸入性损伤、患者年龄和烧伤总面积百分比(%TBSA),在以往的出版物中已有报道。然而,对于烧伤中心之间死亡率结果的差异,以及收治机构或机构规模是否可被视为死亡率的预测因素,我们却知之甚少。利用2003年至2007年期间从国家烧伤资料库获得的87665例急性烧伤观察的去识别数据,估计了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,该模型可参照收治烧伤机构/机构规模预测患者死亡率,并对年龄、吸入性损伤、%TBSA烧伤以及另一个因素——全层烧伤百分比(%FTB)的差异进行了调整。如先前报道,所有三个协变量(%TBSA烧伤、吸入性损伤和年龄)均被发现是烧伤患者死亡的高度统计学显著风险因素(P值<0.0001)。另一个变量%FTB也被发现是一个统计学显著的决定因素,尽管它并没有显著改善多变量模型。治疗/收治机构被发现是一个独立的死亡率预测因素,某些医院死亡几率增加,而其他医院则显示出保护作用(优势比降低)。烧伤量大的医院死亡率风险最高。具有相似风险因素(%TBSA烧伤、吸入性损伤、年龄和%FTB)的患者的死亡率结果受治疗机构及其收治规模的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Burn-center quality improvement: are burn outcomes dependent on admitting facilities and is there a volume-outcome "sweet-spot"?烧伤中心质量改进:烧伤治疗结果是否取决于收治机构,以及是否存在一个量-效“甜蜜点”?
Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):559-66.
2
Ten year experience of burn, trauma, and combined burn/trauma injuries comparing outcomes.烧伤、创伤及烧伤/创伤复合伤十年经验对比结果
J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):696-700; dicussion 700-1. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000140480.50079.a8.
3
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
4
Response of a local hospital to a burn disaster: Contributory factors leading to zero mortality outcomes.当地一家医院对烧伤灾难的应对:实现零死亡结果的促成因素。
Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1083-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 May 9.
5
The Effect of Burn Center Volume on Mortality in a Pediatric Population: An Analysis of the National Burn Repository.烧伤中心规模对儿科患者死亡率的影响:基于国家烧伤数据库的分析
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000274.
6
The measured effect magnitude of co-morbidities on burn injury mortality.共病对烧伤死亡率的测量效应量。
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1433-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
[Retrospective study on the myocardial damage of 252 patients with severe burn].252例重度烧伤患者心肌损伤的回顾性研究
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2016 May;32(5):260-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.05.002.
8
Hyperbaric Oxygen and Mortality in Burns With Inhalation Injury: A Study of the National Burn Repository.高压氧与吸入性损伤烧伤患者的死亡率:国家烧伤资料库研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Sep 30;42(5):900-904. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab105.
9
Clinical characteristics and risk factors for severe burns complicated by early acute kidney injury.烧伤合并早期急性肾损伤的临床特点及危险因素分析。
Burns. 2020 Aug;46(5):1100-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
Burn center volume makes a difference for burned children.烧伤中心的规模对烧伤儿童有影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 May;16(4):319-24. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000366.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Real-World National and Regional Trends in Definitive Closure in U.S. Burn Care: A Survey of U.S. Burn Centers.评估美国烧伤护理中确定性闭合的真实世界的全国和地区趋势:对美国烧伤中心的调查。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Jan 5;43(1):141-148. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab151.
2
The Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance and Mutants in Isolated from Burnt Patients of Shohada Mehrab Yazd Hospital Burn Ward.对来自设拉子医科大学梅赫拉布亚兹德医院烧伤病房烧伤患者分离菌的抗生素耐药性及突变体的评估
Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2020 Jul;9(2):140-146. doi: 10.29252/rbmb.9.2.140.
3
Nurse Staffing, the Clinical Work Environment, and Burn Patient Mortality.护士人力配置、临床工作环境与烧伤患者死亡率。
J Burn Care Res. 2020 Jul 3;41(4):796-802. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa061.
4
Predictors of mortality and validation of burn mortality prognostic scores in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit.马来西亚烧伤重症监护病房死亡率的预测因素及烧伤死亡率预后评分的验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0284-8.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States.美国重度烧伤治疗中使用自体细胞采集设备与标准治疗相比的成本效益。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jul;36(7):1715-1729. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00961-2. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Volume-outcome relationship on survival and cost benefits in severe burn injury: a retrospective analysis of a Japanese nationwide administrative database.严重烧伤患者生存及成本效益的容量-结局关系:一项基于日本全国行政数据库的回顾性分析
J Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 30;7:7. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0363-7. eCollection 2019.
7
Burn center care reduces acute health care utilization after discharge: A population-based analysis of 1,895 survivors of major burn injury.烧伤中心护理可降低出院后的急性医疗保健利用率:一项基于人群的1895名重度烧伤幸存者的分析。
Surgery. 2017 Oct;162(4):891-900. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
Trends in the epidemiology of major burn injury among hospitalized patients: A population-based analysis.住院患者中重度烧伤损伤的流行病学趋势:一项基于人群的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):867-874. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001586.
9
The Effect of Burn Center Volume on Mortality in a Pediatric Population: An Analysis of the National Burn Repository.烧伤中心规模对儿科患者死亡率的影响:基于国家烧伤数据库的分析
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000274.
10
Patient outcomes vs. service workload: an analysis of outcomes in the burn service of England and Wales.患者治疗结果与服务工作量:对英格兰和威尔士烧伤服务治疗结果的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 2;15:133. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0813-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive factors of mortality in burn patients.烧伤患者死亡率的预测因素。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2007 Nov-Dec;49(6):365-70. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652007000600006.
2
Improving the ability to predict mortality among burn patients.提高烧伤患者死亡率的预测能力。
Burns. 2008 May;34(3):320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery.国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP):外科领域的新前沿。
Surgery. 2005 Nov;138(5):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.016.
4
Outcome and changes over time in survival following severe burns from 1985 to 2004.1985年至2004年严重烧伤患者生存的结局及随时间的变化情况。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Dec;31(12):1648-53. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2819-6. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
5
Long-term trends in mortality according to age among adult burn patients.成年烧伤患者按年龄划分的死亡率长期趋势。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):21-5. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200301000-00006.
6
Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction.提高医疗质量:在职业自豪感、支付方利润和患者满意度之间架起桥梁。
JAMA. 2001 Nov 28;286(20):2578-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.20.2578.
7
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国退伍军人事务部的国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP):首个全国性、经过验证、基于结果、风险调整且由同行控制的用于衡量和提升外科护理质量的计划。国家退伍军人事务部外科质量改进计划。
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):491-507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006.