Suppr超能文献

印度次大陆盆地假说与印度和亚洲新生代两阶段碰撞。

Greater India Basin hypothesis and a two-stage Cenozoic collision between India and Asia.

机构信息

Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, Sem Sælands vei 24, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 15;109(20):7659-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117262109. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

Abstract

Cenozoic convergence between the Indian and Asian plates produced the archetypical continental collision zone comprising the Himalaya mountain belt and the Tibetan Plateau. How and where India-Asia convergence was accommodated after collision at or before 52 Ma remains a long-standing controversy. Since 52 Ma, the two plates have converged up to 3,600 ± 35 km, yet the upper crustal shortening documented from the geological record of Asia and the Himalaya is up to approximately 2,350-km less. Here we show that the discrepancy between the convergence and the shortening can be explained by subduction of highly extended continental and oceanic Indian lithosphere within the Himalaya between approximately 50 and 25 Ma. Paleomagnetic data show that this extended continental and oceanic "Greater India" promontory resulted from 2,675 ± 700 km of North-South extension between 120 and 70 Ma, accommodated between the Tibetan Himalaya and cratonic India. We suggest that the approximately 50 Ma "India"-Asia collision was a collision of a Tibetan-Himalayan microcontinent with Asia, followed by subduction of the largely oceanic Greater India Basin along a subduction zone at the location of the Greater Himalaya. The "hard" India-Asia collision with thicker and contiguous Indian continental lithosphere occurred around 25-20 Ma. This hard collision is coincident with far-field deformation in central Asia and rapid exhumation of Greater Himalaya crystalline rocks, and may be linked to intensification of the Asian monsoon system. This two-stage collision between India and Asia is also reflected in the deep mantle remnants of subduction imaged with seismic tomography.

摘要

新生代期间,印度板块与亚洲板块的汇聚作用产生了典型的大陆碰撞带,包括喜马拉雅山脉带和青藏高原。印度-亚洲板块的汇聚作用是在何时何地发生的,以及在 5200 万年前的碰撞之后如何继续汇聚,一直存在争议。自 5200 万年前以来,两个板块已经汇聚了多达 3600±35 千米,但亚洲和喜马拉雅山地质记录所记录的地壳缩短量却少了大约 2350 千米。在这里,我们表明,汇聚和缩短之间的差异可以通过大约 50 至 25 百万年前喜马拉雅山内高度伸展的大陆和大洋印度岩石圈的俯冲来解释。古地磁数据表明,这个伸展的大陆和大洋“大印度”岬角是由 120 至 70 百万年前南北方向伸展 2675±700 千米形成的,位于喜马拉雅山的藏北和克拉通印度之间。我们认为,大约 50 百万年前的“印度”-亚洲碰撞是一个藏喜马拉雅微大陆与亚洲的碰撞,随后是大部分大洋的大印度盆地沿着位于大喜马拉雅山的俯冲带俯冲。大约 25-20 百万年前,“硬”印度-亚洲碰撞发生在较厚的、连续的印度大陆岩石圈上。这次硬碰撞与中亚的远场变形和大喜马拉雅山结晶岩的快速抬升同时发生,可能与亚洲季风系统的加强有关。印度与亚洲之间的这种两阶段碰撞也反映在地震层析成像所描绘的俯冲带深部地幔残余物中。

相似文献

4
The boundary between the Indian and Asian tectonic plates below Tibet.西藏下方的印度和亚洲构造板块之间的边界。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 22;107(25):11229-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001921107. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
7
Magmatic record of India-Asia collision.印度-亚洲碰撞的岩浆记录。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 23;5:14289. doi: 10.1038/srep14289.

引用本文的文献

4
Speciation and diversification of the (Apiaceae) in East Asia.东亚伞形科植物的物种形成与多样化
PhytoKeys. 2024 Oct 22;248:41-57. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.248.132707. eCollection 2024.
5
Phylogenetic evidence clarifies the history of the extrusion of Indochina.系统发育证据阐明了印度支那挤出的历史。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 27;121(35):e2322527121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322527121. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The boundary between the Indian and Asian tectonic plates below Tibet.西藏下方的印度和亚洲构造板块之间的边界。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 22;107(25):11229-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001921107. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
2
The geological evolution of the Tibetan Plateau.青藏高原的地质演化。
Science. 2008 Aug 22;321(5892):1054-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1155371.
3
Constraints on the early uplift history of the Tibetan Plateau.青藏高原早期隆升历史的限制因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):4987-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703595105. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
4
Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet plateau.青藏高原的斜向阶梯式隆升与生长
Science. 2001 Nov 23;294(5547):1671-7. doi: 10.1126/science.105978.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验