• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高华盛顿州皮尔斯县一个农村学区的免疫接种覆盖率。

Improving immunization coverage in a rural school district in Pierce County, Washington.

作者信息

Peterson Robin M, Cook Carolyn, Yerxa Mary E, Marshall James H, Pulos Elizabeth, Rollosson Matthew P

机构信息

MultiCare Mobile Health Services, Tacoma, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Nurs. 2012 Oct;28(5):352-7. doi: 10.1177/1059840512446069. Epub 2012 May 1.

DOI:10.1177/1059840512446069
PMID:22550163
Abstract

Washington State has some of the highest percentages of school immunization exemptions in the country. We compared school immunization records in a rural school district in Pierce County, Washington, to immunization records in the state immunization information system (IIS) and parent-held records. Correcting school immunization records resulted in an increase in the number of students classified as fully immunized from 1,189 to 1,564 (p < .0001). We conducted school-based immunization clinics that increased the number of fully immunized students to 1,624 (p = .013). Immunized students with certificates of exemption on file suggest exemptions of convenience. Strategies to improve school immunization services include assigning IIS access to school administrative staff and educating school staff and parents on the importance of immunization.

摘要

华盛顿州的学校免疫豁免率在全国处于较高水平。我们将华盛顿州皮尔斯县一个农村学区的学校免疫记录与该州免疫信息系统(IIS)中的记录以及家长持有的记录进行了比较。对学校免疫记录进行修正后,被归类为完全免疫的学生人数从1189人增加到了1564人(p < .0001)。我们开展了以学校为基础的免疫诊所,使完全免疫的学生人数增加到了1624人(p = .013)。有豁免证明文件的已免疫学生表明存在出于便利的豁免情况。改善学校免疫服务的策略包括让学校行政人员能够访问免疫信息系统,并对学校工作人员和家长进行免疫重要性的教育。

相似文献

1
Improving immunization coverage in a rural school district in Pierce County, Washington.提高华盛顿州皮尔斯县一个农村学区的免疫接种覆盖率。
J Sch Nurs. 2012 Oct;28(5):352-7. doi: 10.1177/1059840512446069. Epub 2012 May 1.
2
Improving school immunization rates may be as basic as record reconciliation and policy enforcement: a report from a rural Colorado public health/school district initiative.提高学校免疫接种率或许就像核对记录和执行政策一样基础:一份来自科罗拉多州农村公共卫生/学区倡议的报告。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):269-72. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000196.
3
Motivating factors influencing participation in hepatitis B immunization programs in rural populations.
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1998 Oct-Dec;79(4):2-7.
4
Urban middle school parent perspectives: the vaccines they are willing to have their children receive using school-based immunization programs.城市中学家长的观点:他们愿意让孩子通过学校免疫计划接种的疫苗。
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Sep;47(3):249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
5
Mother and child service coverage: reproductive and child health programme in Alwar district, Rajasthan state.母婴服务覆盖情况:拉贾斯坦邦阿尔瓦尔地区的生殖与儿童健康项目
J Commun Dis. 2006 Mar;38(1):79-87.
6
School-based clinics combat teen pregnancy.校内诊所可对抗青少年怀孕问题。
Contracept Technol Update. 1985 Apr;6(4):53-7.
7
Assessment of vaccine exemptions among Wyoming school children, 2009 and 2011.2009年和2011年怀俄明州学童疫苗豁免情况评估
J Sch Nurs. 2014 Oct;30(5):332-9. doi: 10.1177/1059840513518439. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
8
Increasing Immunization Compliance by Reducing Provisional Admittance.通过减少临时入院来提高免疫接种依从性。
J Sch Nurs. 2016 Aug;32(4):246-57. doi: 10.1177/1059840515622528. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
Abortion services in rural Washington State, 1983-1984 to 1993-1994: availability and outcomes.1983 - 1984年至1993 - 1994年华盛顿州农村地区的堕胎服务:可及性与结果
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):241-5.
10
An evaluation of school-level factors used in a successful school-based hepatitis B immunization initiative.对一项成功的基于学校的乙肝免疫接种倡议中所使用的学校层面因素的评估。
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Jul;37(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接种疫苗行为干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Policy. 2023 Nov;137:104894. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
2
The Impact of Michigan's Nonmedical Vaccine Exemption Rule Change on Philosophical Exemption Rates.密歇根州非医学疫苗豁免规定变更对哲学豁免率的影响。
J Community Health. 2020 Feb;45(1):148-153. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00727-5.
3
Vaccination-Related Activities at Schools With Kindergartners: Evidence From a School Nurse Survey.
幼儿园学校与接种相关的活动:来自学校护士调查的证据。
J Sch Nurs. 2020 Dec;36(6):464-471. doi: 10.1177/1059840519847730. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Nonmedical exemptions from school immunization requirements: a systematic review.学校免疫要求的非医学豁免:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):e62-84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302190. Epub 2014 Sep 11.