PROMIS 疼痛干扰项目库在社区和临床样本中的测量不变性。
Measurement invariance of the PROMIS pain interference item bank across community and clinical samples.
机构信息
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
出版信息
Qual Life Res. 2013 Apr;22(3):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0191-x. Epub 2012 May 3.
Abstract
PURPOSE
This study examined the measurement invariance of responses to the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) item bank. The original PROMIS calibration sample (Wave I) was augmented with a sample of persons recruited from the American Chronic Pain Association (ACPA) to increase the number of participants reporting higher levels of pain. Establishing measurement invariance of an item bank is essential for the valid interpretation of group differences in the latent concept being measured.
METHODS
Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was used to evaluate successive levels of measurement invariance: configural, metric, and scalar invariance.
RESULTS
Support was found for configural and metric invariance of the PROMIS-PI, but not for scalar invariance.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our results of MG-CFA, we recommend retaining the original parameter estimates obtained by combining the community sample of Wave I and ACPA participants. Future studies should extend this study by examining measurement equivalence in an item response theory framework such as differential item functioning analysis.
摘要
目的
本研究检验了患者报告结局测量信息系统（PROMIS）疼痛干扰（PI）项目库对响应的测量不变性。原始的 PROMIS 校准样本（Wave I）通过从美国慢性疼痛协会（ACPA）招募的样本进行扩充，以增加报告更高水平疼痛的参与者数量。建立项目库的测量不变性对于有效解释所测量的潜在概念的群体差异至关重要。
方法
多组验证性因子分析（MG-CFA）用于评估逐步的测量不变性水平：结构、度量和标度不变性。
结果
支持 PROMIS-PI 的结构和度量不变性，但不支持标度不变性。
结论和建议
基于我们的 MG-CFA 结果，我们建议保留通过结合 Wave I 的社区样本和 ACPA 参与者获得的原始参数估计值。未来的研究应通过在项目反应理论框架（例如差异项目功能分析）中检查测量等效性来扩展这项研究。
相似文献
1
Measurement invariance of the PROMIS pain interference item bank across community and clinical samples.PROMIS 疼痛干扰项目库在社区和临床样本中的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Apr;22(3):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0191-x. Epub 2012 May 3.
2
Testing measurement invariance of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pain behaviors score between the US general population sample and a sample of individuals with chronic pain.检验患者报告结局测量信息系统疼痛行为评分在美国一般人群样本和慢性疼痛患者样本中的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0463-0. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
3
An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.一篇关于测量与因子不变性的文章。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89.
4
Assessing measurement invariance of three depression scales between neurologic samples and community samples.评估三种抑郁量表在神经疾病样本和社区样本之间的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1829-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0927-5. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Development and evaluation of the PI-G: a three-scale measure based on the German translation of the PROMIS ® pain interference item bank.PI-G 的开发与评估：基于 PROMIS ® 疼痛干扰项目库德语翻译的三尺度测量。
Qual Life Res. 2014 May;23(4):1255-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0575-6. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
6
Differential item functioning of the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS) pain interference item bank by language (Spanish versus English).患者报告结局信息系统（PROMIS）疼痛干扰题库在语言方面（西班牙语与英语）的项目功能差异。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jun;26(6):1451-1462. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1499-3. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank.探索性和验证性因子分析 PROMIS 疼痛质量项目库。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0467-9. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
8
Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference.开发用于测量疼痛干扰的 PROMIS 项目库。
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025.
9
Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI Pain Interference and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale scores to the PROMIS Pain Interference metric.建立自我报告疼痛的通用指标：将简明疼痛问卷（BPI）疼痛干扰项和SF-36身体疼痛分量表得分与患者报告结果测量信息系统（PROMIS）疼痛干扰指标相联系。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Oct;24(10):2305-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0987-6. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
10
Calibration and initial validation of a general self-efficacy item bank and short form for the NIH PROMIS.NIH PROMIS 一般自我效能感项目库和简式量表的校准和初步验证。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2513-2523. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02198-6. Epub 2019 May 28.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES): protocol for a pragmatic, international multicentre randomised trial.比较手术后镇痛方案的有效性和安全性（CARES）：一项实用的国际多中心随机试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 5;15(4):e099925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099925.
2
A prospective cohort of treatment-seeking patients with problematic use of prescription narcotic drugs: study protocol and baseline characteristics.一个寻求治疗的处方麻醉药品使用问题患者的前瞻性队列研究：研究方案和基线特征。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06368-w.
3
Optimizing Detection and Prediction of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis With Ambulatory Cognitive Tests: Protocol for the Longitudinal Observational CogDetect-MS Study.使用移动认知测试优化多发性硬化症认知功能的检测和预测：纵向观察性 CogDetect-MS 研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 26;13:e59876. doi: 10.2196/59876.
4
Musculoskeletal pain among medical residents: role of workplace safety climate and sexual harassment.医学住院医师的肌肉骨骼疼痛：工作场所安全氛围和性骚扰的作用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 22;25(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07272-w.
5
Centering Group Treatment for Women With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Prospective, Parallel-Group Cohort Study.以患者为中心的团体治疗对间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征女性患者的疗效：一项前瞻性、平行组队列研究。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Apr 1;29(4):410-421. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001271. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
The validity of proxy responses on patient-reported outcome measures: Are proxies a reliable alternative to stroke patients' self-report?代理回应在患者报告结局测量中的有效性：代理是否是中风患者自我报告的可靠替代？
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1735-1745. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02758-9. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Cannabinoid use among Americans with MS: Current trends and gaps in knowledge.美国多发性硬化症患者使用大麻素的情况：当前趋势与知识差距
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020 Sep 22;6(3):2055217320959816. doi: 10.1177/2055217320959816. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
8
Evaluation of preoperative pain in patients undergoing shoulder surgery using the PROMIS pain interference computer-adaptive test.使用患者报告结果测量信息系统（PROMIS）疼痛干扰计算机自适应测试评估接受肩部手术患者的术前疼痛
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;11(Suppl 4):S539-S545. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Using PROMIS® to create clinically meaningful profiles of nephrotic syndrome patients.使用 PROMIS® 为肾病综合征患者创建有临床意义的概况。
Health Psychol. 2019 May;38(5):410-421. doi: 10.1037/hea0000679.
10
Minimally important differences for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference for individuals with back pain.患者报告结局测量信息系统中背痛患者疼痛干扰的最小重要差异。
J Pain Res. 2016 Apr 27;9:251-5. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S93391. eCollection 2016.
本文引用的文献
1
Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel.患者报告结局测量信息系统互联网面板的代表性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
2
Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).与一般美国人群相比，慢性疾病与较差的健康相关生活质量相关，这是通过患者报告的结果测量信息系统（PROMIS）进行测量的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
3
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.患者报告结局测量信息系统（PROMIS）开发并测试了其第一波成人自我报告健康结局项目库：2005-2008 年。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
4
Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks.患者报告结局测量信息系统（PROMIS）域名称和定义修订：IRT 衍生项目库中内容效度的进一步评估。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Nov;19(9):1311-21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9694-5. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
5
Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference.开发用于测量疼痛干扰的 PROMIS 项目库。
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025.
6
Measurement invariance of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire across African-American and Latino adult asthma patients.《小型哮喘生活质量问卷》在非裔美国人和拉丁裔成年哮喘患者中的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):371-80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9443-9. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
7
Practical issues in the application of item response theory: a demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales.项目反应理论应用中的实际问题：使用儿童生活质量量表（PedsQL）4.0通用核心量表项目的示范
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S39-47. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000259879.05499.eb.
8
Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.运用验证性因素分析和项目反应理论检测项目功能差异：迈向统一策略
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1292-306. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292.
9
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.慢性疼痛临床试验的核心结局指标：IMMPACT 建议
Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012.
10
Parameter recovery for the partial credit model using MULTILOG.使用MULTILOG对部分计分模型进行参数恢复。
J Outcome Meas. 1997;1(2):114-42.
Zotero 插件