Suppr超能文献

低视力生活质量问卷土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。

Validity and reliability study of Turkish version on low vision with quality of life questionnaire.

作者信息

Idil Aysun, Ozen Mehmet, Atak Nazli, Elhan Atilla, Pehlivan Selcen

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Centre of Low Vision Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4(5):546-51. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.17. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

Abstract

AIM

To adapt the low vision-related quality of life (LVQOL) instrument into Turkish language and to assess its validity and reliability.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 387 patients attending the Centre of Low Vision Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University. For statistical analyses, the Spearman's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used.

RESULTS

According to results of CFA, the item in the "Adjustment" subscale because of having the factor loading below 0.40, was excluded from the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed according to Cronbach's alpha coefficients. The reliability of the "Distance Vision, Mobility, and Lighting" subscale was α=0.863; of the "Adjustment" subscale wasα=0.694; "Reading and Fine Work" wasα=0.791, and "Activities of Daily Living" was α=0.770. So these results indicate that the questionnaire is reliable to measure the vision related quality of life of low-vision patients. The correlations between the subscales were also analyzed, and the correlation between "Adjustment" and "Reading and Fine Work" was found to be the lowest (r(s)=0.336, P<0.001), whereas the strongest correlation was found between the "Reading and Fine Work", and "Activities of Daily Living". Additionally, the "Adjustment" dimension showed the strongest correlation with only "Distance Vision, Mobility, and Lighting" dimension.

CONCLUSION

After removing the last item in the second dimension, the Turkish adaptation of all dimensions of the LVQOL has been shown to be reliable, valid and suitable for use in patients with low vision in Turkey.

摘要

目的

将低视力相关生活质量(LVQOL)工具翻译成土耳其语,并评估其有效性和可靠性。

方法

该研究在安卡拉大学医学院低视力康复中心就诊的387例患者中进行。统计分析采用Spearman相关系数、Cronbach's alpha系数和验证性因子分析(CFA)。

结果

根据CFA结果,“适应”子量表中的项目因因子载荷低于0.40,被从问卷中剔除。根据Cronbach's alpha系数评估问卷的可靠性。“远距离视力、活动能力和照明”子量表的可靠性为α=0.863;“适应”子量表为α=0.694;“阅读和精细工作”为α=0.791,“日常生活活动”为α=0.770。因此,这些结果表明该问卷在测量低视力患者的视力相关生活质量方面是可靠的。还分析了子量表之间的相关性,发现“适应”与“阅读和精细工作”之间的相关性最低(r(s)=0.336,P<0.001),而“阅读和精细工作”与 “日常生活活动” 之间的相关性最强。此外,“适应”维度仅与“远距离视力、活动能力和照明”维度显示出最强的相关性。

结论

在删除第二个维度的最后一项后,LVQOL所有维度的土耳其语改编版已被证明是可靠、有效的,适用于土耳其的低视力患者。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability study of Turkish version on low vision with quality of life questionnaire.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4(5):546-51. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.17. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
2
Activities and participation after stroke: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(13):1912-1917. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
3
The adaptation of the Well-Being in Pregnancy (WiP) Questionnaire into Turkish: validity and reliability of a questionnaire.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):1897-1904. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2054676. Epub 2022 May 29.
4
Establishing the Turkish version of the SIGAM mobility scale, and determining its validity and reliability in lower extremity amputees.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb;40(3):346-352. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250125. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 8-10.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Sep;31(5):565-575. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12742. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain Questionnaire.
Cancer Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;40(3):224-229. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000390.
7
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Validity and reliability of a quality-of-life assessment instrument in children aged between 6 and 11 years.
Ann Saudi Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):269-81. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.269.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of transcorneal electrical stimulation therapy in the early stages of retinitis pigmentosa.
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;52(3):741-746. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5368. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Comparison of Quality of Life Questionnaires in Patients with Low Vision.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 29;51(2):83-88. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.99975.
3
Validation of the Spanish version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire.
J Optom. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
4
A Common Approach to Low Vision: Examination and Rehabilitation of the Patient with Low Vision.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 30;49(2):89-98. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.65928.
6
Low Vision Rehabilitation in Older Adults.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;46(3):118-122. doi: 10.4274/tjo.68878. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Uncertainty in Illness Scale among children with chronic illness.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Apr;32(3):288-96. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl021. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
4
Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1260-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.007. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
5
Development and psychometric tests of the Chinese-version Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Qual Life Res. 2005 Aug;14(6):1633-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0026-5.
7
Disparities between ophthalmologists and their patients in estimating quality of life.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun;15(3):238-43. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000120712.35941.ad.
8
Report of five hundred patients examined for low vision.
AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956 Aug;56(2):171-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1956.00930040179002.
9
Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting.
BMJ. 2001 May 26;322(7297):1297-300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验