• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《低视力生活质量问卷》西班牙版本的验证。

Validation of the Spanish version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire.

机构信息

Ophthalmology Unit, Hospital de la Esperanza, MAR Health Park, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Optics and Optometry, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa, Spain.

出版信息

J Optom. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004
PMID:33879374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9237595/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate the Spanish Low Vision Qualify of Life (SLVQOL) questionnaire, a quality of life instrument specifically designed for patients with visual impairment, and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The study included 170 visually impaired patients and 195 healthy subjects. Participants were administered the SLVQOL, the NEI VFQ-25, and the EQ 5D-5L questionnaires. Reliability, test-retest reproducibility, feasibility, and construct validity of the SLVQOL were assessed. The Generalized Partial Credit Model was used to fit the data and the performance of each item was characterized using category response curves and item information.

RESULTS

The reliability of the SLVQOL was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.978-0.985). Test-retest reproducibility was good (ρ=0.864, P<.001). A cut-off point of 105 or 106 was optimal to detect visual impairment, with a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 91.8%. Construct validity was shown by the corresponding convergence or divergence correlations between the score of the SLVQOL and its dimensions and the overall and partial scores of the NEI VFQ-25 and the EQ 5D-5L. Item response theory analysis showed discrimination and information parameters ranging from 0.539 to 3.063 and from -1.894 to 1.074, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The SLVQOL was able to quantitatively assess and identify differences in the quality of life among patients with visual impairment and normal subjects. The evaluated psychometric properties suggest that this tool has excellent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility, but may benefit from a reduction of the number of items.

摘要

目的

验证专门为视力障碍患者设计的生活质量工具——西班牙语低视力生活质量问卷(SLVQOL),评估其心理测量学特性。

方法

本研究纳入了 170 名视力障碍患者和 195 名健康对照者。参与者完成了 SLVQOL、NEI VFQ-25 和 EQ 5D-5L 问卷。评估了 SLVQOL 的信度、重测信度、可行性和结构效度。使用广义部分信用模型对数据进行拟合,并用类别反应曲线和项目信息来描述每个项目的表现。

结果

SLVQOL 的信度为 0.981(95%CI:0.978-0.985)。重测信度良好(ρ=0.864,P<.001)。105 或 106 分作为区分有无视力障碍的最佳截断值,灵敏度为 95.4%,特异度为 91.8%。SLVQOL 的评分与其维度以及 NEI VFQ-25 和 EQ 5D-5L 的总体和部分评分之间的相应收敛或发散相关性表明了结构效度。项目反应理论分析显示,辨别力和信息量参数范围分别为 0.539 至 3.063 和-1.894 至 1.074。

结论

SLVQOL 能够定量评估和识别视力障碍患者和正常受试者之间的生活质量差异。评估的心理测量学特性表明,该工具具有极好的有效性、内部一致性和可重复性,但可能受益于项目数量的减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fc/9237595/2eb307f28271/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fc/9237595/6119d58cfe9a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fc/9237595/2eb307f28271/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fc/9237595/6119d58cfe9a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fc/9237595/2eb307f28271/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Spanish version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire.《低视力生活质量问卷》西班牙版本的验证。
J Optom. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
Psychometric properties of the Greek version of the NEI-VFQ 25.希腊语版NEI-VFQ 25的心理测量特性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar 6;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-8-4.
3
Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25).25 项国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)克罗地亚语版的心理测量特性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;41(12):4025-4036. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01975-y. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Psychometric performance of the National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire in Latinos and non-Latinos.美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷在拉丁裔和非拉丁裔人群中的心理测量学表现。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Aug;113(8):1363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.073.
5
Psychometric Properties of Scales for Assessing the Vision-related Quality of Life of People with Low Vision: A Systematic Review.评估低视力人群视觉相关生活质量的量表的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;30(3):239-248. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2022.2093919. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) in Serbian patients.塞尔维亚患者中美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ - 25)的验证及跨文化调适
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 15;13:142. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0330-5.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and Visual Function Questionnaire Utility Index in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis.非感染性中后葡萄膜炎患者的国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷和视觉功能问卷效用指数的心理测量评估。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2801-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0412-y. Epub 2013 May 5.
8
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.
9
Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.美国国立眼科研究所屈光不正生活质量量表的心理测量学特性。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec;110(12):2292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2002.07.001.
10
Validation of the brain injury associated visual impairment - impact questionnaire (BIVI-IQ).脑损伤相关视觉障碍影响问卷(BIVI-IQ)的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03565-0. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Refractive Cataract Surgery Survey (RCSS): A Validated Questionnaire for Quick Clinical Use.屈光性白内障手术调查(RCSS):一种经过验证的可快速用于临床的问卷。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 2;19:1191-1202. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S515694. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and cultural adaptation into Spanish of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire.《低视力生活质量问卷》的西班牙语翻译及文化调适
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2019 Aug;94(8):384-390. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Crosscultural adaptation and validation into Spanish of the questionnaire National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25.《美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷25》问卷的跨文化适应及西班牙语版验证
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2018 Dec;93(12):586-591. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
3
Visual and health outcomes, measured with the activity inventory and the EQ-5D, in visual impairment.
采用活动量表和EQ-5D测量的视力损害患者的视觉和健康结局。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;95(8):e783-e791. doi: 10.1111/aos.13430. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球与年龄相关的黄斑变性患病率及 2020 与 2040 年疾病负担预测:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Feb;2(2):e106-16. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in an urban population: The Chennai Glaucoma Study.城市人口中低视力和失明的患病率及病因:金奈青光眼研究
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;62(4):477-81. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.111186.
6
Design and evaluation of a customized reading rehabilitation program for patients with age-related macular degeneration.专为年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计和评估的阅读康复方案。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Jan;120(1):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.035. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
7
Validity and reliability study of Turkish version on low vision with quality of life questionnaire.低视力生活质量问卷土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4(5):546-51. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.17. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
8
Assessing quality of life in patients with glaucoma using the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire.使用青光眼生活质量-15(GQL-15)问卷评估青光眼患者的生活质量。
J Glaucoma. 2009 Jan;18(1):6-12. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181752c83.
9
Evaluation of the Thai, Low Vision Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (LVQOL).泰国低视力生活质量问卷(LVQOL)的评估。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Dec;90(12):2658-61.
10
The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires.问卷的编制、评估与选择。
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):663-74. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318141fe75.