Suppr超能文献

传统维护与电化学氧化在确保牙科设备水路水质安全方面的经济比较

Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines.

作者信息

Fischer Sebastian, Meyer Georg, Kramer Axel

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine Greifswald, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2012;7(1):Doc08. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000192. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection.

METHODS

The cost evaluation included only the costs of annually required antimicrobial consumables and additional water usage of a decentralize conventional maintenance system for dental water lines build in the respective dental units and the central electrochemical water disinfection system, BLUE SAFETY™ Technologies.

RESULTS

In total, analysis of costs of 6 dental departments reviled additional annual costs for hygienic preventive measures of € 4,448.37. For the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology, the additional annual total agent consumption costs were € 2.18, accounting for approximately 0.05% of the annual total agent consumption costs of the conventional maintenance system. For both water processing concepts, the additional costs for energy could not be calculated, since the required data was not obtainable from the manufacturers.

DISCUSSION

For both concepts, the investment and maintenance costs were not calculated due to lack of manufacturer's data. Therefore, the results indicate the difference of costs for the required consumables only. Aside of the significantly lower annual costs for required consumables and disinfectants; a second advantage for the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology is its constant and automatic operation, which does not require additional staff resources. This not only safety human resources, but add additionally to cost saving.

CONCLUSION

Since the antimicrobial disinfection capacity of the BLUE SAFETY™ was demonstrated previously and is well known, this technology, which is comparable or even superior in its non-corrosive effect, may be regarded as method of choice for continuous disinfection and prevention of biofilm formation in dental units' water lines.

摘要

背景

为在牙科部门实施中央水处理系统做准备,我们分析了牙科设备传统分散式消毒的成本,并与基于电化学消毒的中央水处理概念进行了对比。

方法

成本评估仅包括每年所需抗菌耗材的成本,以及各个牙科设备中内置的分散式传统牙科水线维护系统和中央电化学水消毒系统BLUE SAFETY™ Technologies的额外用水量。

结果

总共对6个牙科部门的成本分析显示,卫生预防措施的年度额外成本为4448.37欧元。对于BLUE SAFETY™技术,年度额外的总药剂消耗成本为2.18欧元,约占传统维护系统年度总药剂消耗成本的0.05%。对于这两种水处理概念,由于无法从制造商处获得所需数据,因此无法计算能源的额外成本。

讨论

由于缺乏制造商数据,两种概念的投资和维护成本均未计算。因此,结果仅表明所需耗材的成本差异。除了所需耗材和消毒剂的年度成本显著降低外;BLUE SAFETY™技术的另一个优势是其持续自动运行,不需要额外的人力。这不仅节省了人力资源,还进一步节省了成本。

结论

由于BLUE SAFETY™的抗菌消毒能力先前已得到证明且广为人知,该技术在无腐蚀性方面与之相当甚至更优,可被视为牙科设备水线连续消毒和预防生物膜形成的首选方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ced/3334949/cbcd087fe0a9/KHI-07-08-t-001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验