Suppr超能文献

疼痛管理差异研究中的挑战与机遇:对临床实践、倡导和政策的影响。

Challenges and opportunities in pain management disparities research: implications for clinical practice, advocacy, and policy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2012 Jul;13(7):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 May 2.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Due to high profile initiatives at the national level, awareness of inadequate pain care affecting many groups in our society has never been greater. Nevertheless, increased awareness of pain disparities and the initiatives to address these disparities have yielded only modest progress, most notably in the form of growing appreciation that pain disparities likely result from multiple factors, including biological, psychological, environmental, health system, and cultural factors. Much less progress has been made in developing interventions that target these multiple determinants to reduce pain management disparities. In this paper we discuss key ethical and methodological challenges that undermine our capacity to investigate and develop meaningful interventions to improve pain outcomes among vulnerable populations. Key challenges in the areas of research engagement, recruitment, design, and measurement are discussed from both scientific and normative standpoints. Specific opportunities within emerging research paradigms to improve designs and measures are also discussed. Finally, we conclude with identifying potential synergies between the pain management disparities research agenda and the broader areas of clinical practice, advocacy, and policy that could help to move the field forward.

PERSPECTIVE

Researchers studying disparities in pain care face a number of ethical and methodological challenges that must be addressed to advance the field towards eliminating disparities. We discuss these ethical and methodological challenges and propose opportunities for paradigmatic revisions in areas of research engagement, design, measurement, advocacy, and policy.

摘要

未加标签

由于国家层面的高调举措,人们对影响我们社会许多群体的疼痛护理不足的认识从未如此强烈。尽管人们对疼痛差异的认识以及解决这些差异的举措有所增加,但只取得了适度的进展,最显著的是越来越认识到疼痛差异可能是由多种因素造成的,包括生物、心理、环境、医疗系统和文化因素。在制定针对这些多种决定因素的干预措施以减少疼痛管理差异方面,进展甚微。在本文中,我们讨论了关键的伦理和方法学挑战,这些挑战削弱了我们调查和制定有意义的干预措施以改善弱势群体疼痛结果的能力。从科学和规范的角度讨论了研究参与、招募、设计和测量方面的关键挑战。最后,我们确定了疼痛管理差异研究议程与临床实践、宣传和政策等更广泛领域之间的潜在协同作用,这些协同作用有助于推动该领域的发展。

观点

研究疼痛护理差异的研究人员面临着许多必须解决的伦理和方法学挑战,才能使该领域朝着消除差异的方向前进。我们讨论了这些伦理和方法学挑战,并提出了在研究参与、设计、测量、宣传和政策等领域进行范式修订的机会。

相似文献

3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.健康公平倡导:一项综合综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12112.
6
Disparities in Pain Management.疼痛管理中的差异。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2023 Jun;41(2):471-488. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.03.008.
10
Israel: health and beyond.以色列:医疗与超越
Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2551-2562. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30877-2. Epub 2017 May 8.

引用本文的文献

7
Cultural Competence and the Postoperative Experience: Pain Control and Rehabilitation.文化能力与术后体验:疼痛控制与康复
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 May 23;5(4):100733. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.04.016. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

5
Cultural considerations in evidence-based practice.循证实践中的文化考虑。
J Transcult Nurs. 2010 Jul;21(3):271-80. doi: 10.1177/1043659609358782.
6
Race, ethnicity, and pain among the U.S. adult population.美国成年人口中的种族、族裔与疼痛
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1):177-220. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0255.
10
Pain coping in Latino populations.拉丁裔人群的疼痛应对方式。
J Pain. 2009 Oct;10(10):1012-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验