Park Susanna B, Lin Cindy S-Y, Kiernan Matthew C
Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales.
J Vis Exp. 2012 Apr 26(62):3439. doi: 10.3791/3439.
Chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is a serious consequence of cancer treatment, which occurs with some of the most commonly used chemotherapies(1,2). Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy produces symptoms of numbness and paraesthesia in the limbs and may progress to difficulties with fine motor skills and walking, leading to functional impairment. In addition to producing troubling symptoms, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy may limit treatment success leading to dose reduction or early cessation of treatment. Neuropathic symptoms may persist long-term, leaving permanent nerve damage in patients with an otherwise good prognosis(3). As chemotherapy is utilised more often as a preventative measure, and survival rates increase, the importance of long-lasting and significant neurotoxicity will increase. There are no established neuroprotective or treatment options and a lack of sensitive assessment methods. Appropriate assessment of neurotoxicity will be critical as a prognostic factor and as suitable endpoints for future trials of neuroprotective agents. Current methods to assess the severity of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy utilise clinician-based grading scales which have been demonstrated to lack sensitivity to change and inter-observer objectivity(4). Conventional nerve conduction studies provide information about compound action potential amplitude and conduction velocity, which are relatively non-specific measures and do not provide insight into ion channel function or resting membrane potential. Accordingly, prior studies have demonstrated that conventional nerve conduction studies are not sensitive to early change in chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity(4-6). In comparison, nerve excitability studies utilize threshold tracking techniques which have been developed to enable assessment of ion channels, pumps and exchangers in vivo in large myelinated human axons(7-9). Nerve excitability techniques have been established as a tool to examine the development and severity of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity(10-13). Comprising a number of excitability parameters, nerve excitability studies can be used to assess acute neurotoxicity arising immediately following infusion and the development of chronic, cumulative neurotoxicity. Nerve excitability techniques are feasible in the clinical setting, with each test requiring only 5 -10 minutes to complete. Nerve excitability equipment is readily commercially available, and a portable system has been devised so that patients can be tested in situ in the infusion centre setting. In addition, these techniques can be adapted for use in multiple chemotherapies. In patients treated with the chemotherapy oxaliplatin, primarily utilised for colorectal cancer, nerve excitability techniques provide a method to identify patients at-risk for neurotoxicity prior to the onset of chronic neuropathy. Nerve excitability studies have revealed the development of an acute Na(+) channelopathy in motor and sensory axons(10-13). Importantly, patients who demonstrated changes in excitability in early treatment were subsequently more likely to develop moderate to severe neurotoxicity(11). However, across treatment, striking longitudinal changes were identified only in sensory axons which were able to predict clinical neurological outcome in 80% of patients(10). These changes demonstrated a different pattern to those seen acutely following oxaliplatin infusion, and most likely reflect the development of significant axonal damage and membrane potential change in sensory nerves which develops longitudinally during oxaliplatin treatment(10). Significant abnormalities developed during early treatment, prior to any reduction in conventional measures of nerve function, suggesting that excitability parameters may provide a sensitive biomarker.
化疗引起的神经毒性是癌症治疗的严重后果,在一些最常用的化疗中都会出现(1,2)。化疗引起的周围神经病变会产生肢体麻木和感觉异常的症状,并可能发展为精细运动技能和行走困难,导致功能障碍。除了产生令人困扰的症状外,化疗引起的神经病变可能会限制治疗效果,导致剂量减少或提前终止治疗。神经病变症状可能长期持续,给预后良好的患者留下永久性神经损伤(3)。随着化疗作为预防措施的使用越来越频繁,以及生存率的提高,长期且严重的神经毒性的重要性将会增加。目前尚无成熟的神经保护或治疗方案,且缺乏敏感的评估方法。对神经毒性进行适当评估作为一个预后因素以及作为神经保护剂未来试验的合适终点将至关重要。目前评估化疗引起的神经病变严重程度的方法使用基于临床医生的分级量表,已证明该量表对变化缺乏敏感性且观察者间缺乏客观性(4)。传统的神经传导研究提供了关于复合动作电位幅度和传导速度的信息,这些是相对非特异性的测量方法,无法深入了解离子通道功能或静息膜电位。因此,先前的研究表明,传统的神经传导研究对化疗引起的神经毒性的早期变化不敏感(4 - 6)。相比之下,神经兴奋性研究利用阈值跟踪技术,该技术已被开发用于在体内评估大的有髓鞘人类轴突中的离子通道、泵和交换器(7 - 9)。神经兴奋性技术已被确立为一种检查化疗引起的神经毒性的发展和严重程度的工具(10 - 13)。神经兴奋性研究包含多个兴奋性参数,可用于评估输注后立即出现的急性神经毒性以及慢性累积性神经毒性的发展。神经兴奋性技术在临床环境中是可行的,每次测试仅需5 - 10分钟即可完成。神经兴奋性设备在市场上很容易买到,并且已经设计出一种便携式系统,以便患者可以在输液中心现场进行测试。此外,这些技术可适用于多种化疗。在用主要用于治疗结直肠癌的化疗药物奥沙利铂治疗的患者中,神经兴奋性技术提供了一种在慢性神经病变发作之前识别有神经毒性风险患者的方法。神经兴奋性研究揭示了运动和感觉轴突中急性钠通道病的发展(10 - 13)。重要的是,在早期治疗中表现出兴奋性变化的患者随后更有可能发展为中度至重度神经毒性(11)。然而,在整个治疗过程中,仅在感觉轴突中发现了显著的纵向变化,这些变化能够在80%的患者中预测临床神经学结果(10)。这些变化表现出与奥沙利铂输注后急性观察到的不同模式,很可能反映了在奥沙利铂治疗期间感觉神经中显著的轴突损伤和膜电位变化的纵向发展(10)。在早期治疗期间,在神经功能的传统测量指标出现任何下降之前就出现了显著异常,这表明兴奋性参数可能提供一个敏感的生物标志物。