• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间表示和参照系理论:配置错误能告诉我们什么?

Theories of spatial representations and reference frames: what can configuration errors tell us?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 E. Daniel St, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):575-87. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0258-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0258-2
PMID:22565614
Abstract

The issue of reference frame is central to theories of spatial representations. Various classifications have been made for different types of reference frames, along with prototypical research paradigms to distinguish between them. This article focuses on the configuration error paradigm proposed by Wang and Spelke (Cognition 77:215-250, 2000) that has been used to examine the nature of the spatial representations underlying object localization during self-movement. Three basic models of spatial memory and spatial updating are discussed, as well as the assumptions behind the configuration error paradigm, to distinguish between static representations, such as the traditional allocentric cognitive map and the egocentric snapshots, and dynamic representations, such as the egocentric updating system. Recent experimental findings are reexamined and shown to be consistent with multiple models, among which the egocentric-updating-and-reload model with an enduring egocentric component provides the simplest interpretations.

摘要

参考框架的问题是空间表示理论的核心。已经对不同类型的参考框架进行了各种分类,并制定了原型研究范式来区分它们。本文重点介绍了 Wang 和 Spelke(Cognition 77:215-250,2000)提出的配置误差范式,该范式用于研究自我运动中物体定位所基于的空间表示的性质。讨论了三种基本的空间记忆和空间更新模型,以及配置误差范式背后的假设,以区分静态表示,如传统的无参照认知地图和自我中心快照,以及动态表示,如自我中心更新系统。重新检查了最近的实验结果,表明它们与多种模型一致,其中具有持久自我中心成分的自我中心更新和重新加载模型提供了最简单的解释。

相似文献

1
Theories of spatial representations and reference frames: what can configuration errors tell us?空间表示和参照系理论:配置错误能告诉我们什么?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):575-87. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0258-2.
2
The use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in static and dynamic conditions in humans.人类在静态和动态条件下使用自我中心和他心参照系。
Physiol Res. 2020 Nov 16;69(5):787-801. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934528. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
3
Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine.空间记忆:自我中心与非自我中心如何结合。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Dec;10(12):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
4
Reframing spatial frames of reference: What can aging tell us about egocentric and allocentric navigation?重新构建空间参照系:老化能告诉我们关于自我中心和以客体为中心的导航什么?
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2021 May;12(3):e1549. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1549. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
5
Set size effects in spatial updating are independent of the online/offline updating strategy.空间更新中的集大小效应与在线/离线更新策略无关。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):901-911. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000756. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
6
Egocentric metric representations in peripersonal space: A bridge between motor resources and spatial memory.自我中心度量表示在近体空间:运动资源和空间记忆之间的桥梁。
Br J Psychol. 2021 May;112(2):433-454. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12467. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Remembering object position in the absence of vision: egocentric, allocentric, and egocentric decentred frames of reference.在没有视觉的情况下记住物体位置:以自我为中心、以他者为中心以及去中心化的自我中心参照系。
Perception. 2007;36(6):850-64. doi: 10.1068/p5621.
8
Egocentric-updating during navigation facilitates episodic memory retrieval.导航过程中的自我中心更新有助于情景记忆检索。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
9
Allocentric to Egocentric Spatial Switching: Impairment in aMCI and Alzheimer's Disease Patients?从自我中心到他我中心的空间转换:轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病患者存在损伤吗?
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(3):229-236. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666171030114821.
10
Updating egocentric representations in human navigation.更新人类导航中的自我中心表征。
Cognition. 2000 Dec 15;77(3):215-50. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00105-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A thalamo-parietal cortex circuit is critical for place-action coordination.丘脑-顶叶皮层回路对于位置-动作协调至关重要。
Hippocampus. 2023 Dec;33(12):1252-1266. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23578. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
2
learning in a structured maze is a multisensory behavior.在结构化迷宫中学习是一种多感官行为。
iScience. 2021 Mar 8;24(4):102284. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102284. eCollection 2021 Apr 23.
3
Naive geography: geoconceptology and topology of geomental maps.
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 15;6(12):e05644. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05644. eCollection 2020 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
From movements to actions: two mechanisms for learning action sequences.从动作到动作:学习动作序列的两种机制。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 Nov;63(3):141-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
2
Chunking in spatial memory.空间记忆中的分块。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):576-89. doi: 10.1037/a0017528.
3
Use of self-to-object and object-to-object spatial relations in locomotion.在运动中自我与物体以及物体与物体空间关系的运用。
4
Gaze direction influences grasping actions towards unseen, haptically explored, objects.注视方向影响对不可见的、触觉探索的物体的抓取动作。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 25;10(1):15774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72554-x.
5
Bayesian average or truncation at boundaries? The mechanisms underlying categorical bias in spatial memory.贝叶斯平均法还是边界截断法?空间记忆中分类偏差的潜在机制。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):473-484. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0884-7.
6
Evaluation of a conceptual framework for predicting navigation performance in virtual reality.用于预测虚拟现实中导航性能的概念框架评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 15;12(9):e0184682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184682. eCollection 2017.
7
Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.通过整合多个路径整合系统构建认知地图。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):692-702. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0952-y.
8
Examining reference frame interaction in spatial memory using a distribution analysis.使用分布分析研究空间记忆中的参照系交互作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):239-45. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0871-y.
9
Spatial scale, rather than nature of task or locomotion, modulates the spatial reference frame of attention.空间尺度,而非任务或运动的性质,调节注意力的空间参照系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Jun;41(3):866-78. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000056. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
10
Getting completely turned around: how disorientation impacts subjective straight ahead.完全迷失方向:定向障碍如何影响主观正前方。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Jan;43(1):143-50. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0457-3.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1137-47. doi: 10.1037/a0016273.
4
Cognitive maps in rats and men.大鼠和人类的认知地图。
Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208. doi: 10.1037/h0061626.
5
Spatial memory during progressive disorientation.渐进性定向障碍期间的空间记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):602-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.602.
6
The locale map of honey bees: do insects have cognitive maps?蜜蜂的栖息地地图:昆虫有认知地图吗?
Science. 1986 May 16;232(4752):861-3. doi: 10.1126/science.232.4752.861.
7
Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation.自我中心和他我中心空间表征在运动和重新定向中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1274-90. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1274.
8
Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine.空间记忆:自我中心与非自我中心如何结合。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Dec;10(12):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
9
Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation.在迷失方向和自我旋转状态下的短暂和持久空间表征
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):867-82. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.867.
10
Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments.过度学习和新环境中物体与物体关系的自我中心编码
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1069-87. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1069.