Suppr超能文献

为什么内镜导水管成形术如此频繁地失败?使用电影相位对比磁共振成像分析内镜第三脑室造瘘和导水管成形术后的脑脊液流动。

Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Radiological Practice, Stralsund, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;117(1):141-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111926. Epub 2012 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis.

METHODS

In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n=8), ETV (n=8), and both ETV and EAP (n=6), CSF flow through the restored aqueduct and through the ventriculostomy was investigated using cine cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI. For qualitative evaluation of CSF flow, an in-plane phase-contrast sequence in the midsagittal plane was used. The MR images were displayed in a closed-loop cine format. Quantitative through-plane measurements were performed in the axial plane perpendicular to the aqueduct and/or floor of the third ventricle.

RESULTS

Evaluation revealed significantly higher CSF flow through the ventriculostomies compared with flow through the aqueducts. This was true both when comparing the ETV group with the EAP group and when comparing the flow of the ventriculostomy and aqueduct within the ETV and EAP group. There was no difference in aqueductal CSF flow between patients who underwent EAP alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. There was also no difference in ventriculostomy CSF flow between patients who underwent ETV alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. Fifty percent of the restored aqueducts became occluded at a mean of 46 months after surgery (range 18-126 months). In contrast, all ETVs remained patent in the mean follow-up period of 110 months after surgery, although 1 patient required shunt placement after 66 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebrospinal fluid flow through ventriculostomies is significantly higher than aqueductal CSF flow after EAP. This could be one factor to explain why the reclosure rate of aqueducts after EAP is higher than the reclosure rate of the ventriculostoma after ETV.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较内镜第三脑室造瘘术(ETV)和内镜导水管成形术(EAP)后因导水管狭窄引起梗阻性脑积水患者的脑脊液(CSF)流动。

方法

在接受 EAP(n=8)、ETV(n=8)和 ETV 加 EAP(n=6)治疗的导水管狭窄患者中,使用电影心脏门控相位对比 MRI 研究重建后的导水管和脑室造瘘管的 CSF 流动。为了定性评估 CSF 流动,使用中矢状面的平面内相位对比序列。MR 图像以闭路电影格式显示。在垂直于导水管和/或第三脑室底部的轴平面上进行定量的平面内测量。

结果

评估结果显示,脑室造瘘管的 CSF 流动明显高于导水管。在 ETV 组与 EAP 组比较,以及在 ETV 和 EAP 组中比较脑室造瘘管和导水管的流量时,均为如此。单独接受 EAP 的患者与同时接受 ETV 和 EAP 的患者之间,导水管 CSF 流量无差异。单独接受 ETV 的患者与同时接受 ETV 和 EAP 的患者之间,脑室造瘘管 CSF 流量也无差异。术后平均 46 个月(范围 18-126 个月)时,有 50%的重建导水管闭塞。相比之下,所有 ETV 在术后平均 110 个月的随访期间均保持通畅,尽管有 1 例患者在 66 个月后需要放置分流管。

结论

EAP 后,脑室造瘘管的 CSF 流量明显高于 EAP 后的导水管 CSF 流量。这可能是 EAP 后导水管再闭塞率高于 ETV 后脑室造瘘管再闭塞率的一个因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验