Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, UCB 345, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1905 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO 80309, United States.
Complement Ther Med. 2012 Aug;20(4):175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Identifying a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce the stress response could be particularly beneficial to college students, a group prone to considerable stress. Acupressure has shown some efficacy in reducing stress in adults following stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI), but multiple treatments were required. Results from single treatments in healthy populations have been mixed.
The current study used a randomised, placebo-controlled, single-blind design to investigate the use of a single acupressure treatment for stress reduction in healthy college students (n=109) during a stressor.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three single, 40-min interventions: active acupressure, placebo acupressure, or a relaxation CD control. A math task stressor administered before and after the intervention assessed intervention effects on stressor responsivity.
Stress responses were measured by physiological (heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), skin conductance response (SCR)) and subjective measures (State Anxiety Inventory, nine-item Psychological Stress Measure) of anxiety and stress.
All interventions were associated with the following changes during the post-intervention stressor compared to the pre-intervention stressor: reduced HR (p<0.001), increased HRV (p<0.024), reduced SCR (p<0.001), reduced subjective stress scores (p<0.001), and increased correct answers (p<0.001). Although all groups demonstrated stress reduction, there were no significant group differences after a single treatment.
All interventions significantly reduced the stress response, although not differently. The lack of active acupressure-associated treatment effects appears to be due to insufficient dosing.
识别一种非药物干预措施来减轻应激反应,这对容易产生较大压力的大学生群体可能特别有益。穴位按压已显示出在中风或创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后减轻成年人压力的一些疗效,但需要多次治疗。在健康人群中单次治疗的结果喜忧参半。
本研究采用随机、安慰剂对照、单盲设计,调查在应激源下对健康大学生(n=109)进行单次穴位按压治疗以减轻压力的效果。
参与者随机分为三组中的一组:主动穴位按压、安慰剂穴位按压或放松 CD 对照组。在干预前后进行数学任务应激源评估干预对应激反应性的影响。
通过生理(心率(HR)、心率变异性(HRV)、皮肤电反应(SCR))和焦虑和压力的主观测量(状态焦虑量表,九项心理压力量表)来测量应激反应。
与干预前的应激源相比,所有干预措施在干预后的应激源期间均表现出以下变化:心率降低(p<0.001)、HRV 增加(p<0.024)、SCR 降低(p<0.001)、主观压力评分降低(p<0.001)和正确答案增加(p<0.001)。尽管所有组都显示出压力减轻,但单次治疗后没有显著的组间差异。
所有干预措施均显著降低了应激反应,尽管没有差异。缺乏主动穴位按压相关的治疗效果似乎是由于剂量不足。