George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
CMAJ. 2012 Aug 7;184(11):E613-24. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111271. Epub 2012 May 14.
Although low-back pain is a highly prevalent condition, its clinical course remains uncertain. Our main objective was to systematically review the literature on the clinical course of pain and disability in patients with acute and persistent low-back pain. Our secondary objective was to investigate whether pain and disability have similar courses.
We performed a meta-analysis of inception cohort studies. We identified eligible studies by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. We included prospective studies that enrolled an episode-inception cohort of patients with acute or persistent low-back pain and that measured pain, disability or recovery. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodologic quality. We used mixed models to determine pooled estimates of pain and disability over time.
Data from 33 discrete cohorts (11 166 participants) were included in the review. The variance-weighted mean pain score (out of a maximum score of 100) was 52 (95% CI 48-57) at baseline, 23 (95% CI 21-25) at 6 weeks, 12 (95% CI 9-15) at 26 weeks and 6 (95% CI 3-10) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain for cohorts with acute pain. Among cohorts with persistent pain, the variance-weighted mean pain score (out of 100) was 51 (95% CI 44-59) at baseline, 33 (95% CI 29-38) at 6 weeks, 26 (95% CI 20-33) at 26 weeks and 23 (95% CI 16-30) at 52 weeks after the onset of pain. The course of disability outcomes was similar to the time course of pain outcomes in the acute pain cohorts, but the pain outcomes were slightly worse than disability outcomes in the persistent pain cohorts.
Patients who presented with acute or persistent low-back pain improved markedly in the first six weeks. After that time improvement slowed. Low to moderate levels of pain and disability were still present at one year, especially in the cohorts with persistent pain.
尽管下背痛是一种高度流行的疾病,但它的临床过程仍不确定。我们的主要目的是系统地回顾有关急性和持续性下背痛患者疼痛和残疾临床过程的文献。我们的次要目的是研究疼痛和残疾是否具有相似的病程。
我们对发病队列研究进行了荟萃分析。我们通过搜索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 来确定合格的研究。我们纳入了前瞻性研究,这些研究招募了急性或持续性下背痛的发病队列患者,并测量了疼痛、残疾或恢复情况。两名独立的审查员提取数据并评估方法学质量。我们使用混合模型来确定随时间推移的疼痛和残疾的汇总估计值。
共纳入 33 项离散队列研究(11166 名参与者)。急性疼痛队列基线时疼痛评分(满分 100 分)的方差加权平均值为 52(95%CI 48-57),6 周时为 23(95%CI 21-25),26 周时为 12(95%CI 9-15),52 周时为 6(95%CI 3-10)。持续性疼痛队列中,疼痛评分(满分 100 分)的方差加权平均值为 51(95%CI 44-59),6 周时为 33(95%CI 29-38),26 周时为 26(95%CI 20-33),52 周时为 23(95%CI 16-30)。残疾结局的病程与急性疼痛队列中疼痛结局的时间进程相似,但持续性疼痛队列中疼痛结局略差于残疾结局。
出现急性或持续性下背痛的患者在最初的 6 周内明显改善。此后,改善速度放缓。在一年时,疼痛和残疾仍处于低至中度水平,尤其是在持续性疼痛队列中。