University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 15;37(8):678-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318230ab20.
Prospective cohort study.
To assess the prognosis of patients presenting with acute low back pain (LBP) in a primary care setting in the United States.
Practice guidelines for acute LBP based on return-to-work outcomes underestimate the development of chronic pain in the primary care setting. Because of differences in inclusion criteria, chronic pain definitions, and national health systems, prognostic cohort studies have reported a wide range of results limiting interpretation and generalization. Current data from carefully designed prognostic studies of acute LBP are lacking for the US primary care system.
Members of a large health service organization were enrolled after seeking medical care for acute LBP, with or without sciatica, of up to 30 days duration, with no episode in the past 12 months and no history of spine surgery. We conducted phone interviews at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years. Based on receiver operating characteristic analyses, a combination of global perceived recovery with pain intensity was used as primary outcome for chronic pain. Recurrence and multiple secondary outcomes were assessed to allow for comparison with other studies.
Six hundred five patients had an average pain intensity of 5.6 (numeric rating scale = 0-10) and disability of 15.8 (Roland-Morris scale = 0-24). Eight percent had declared sick leave between pain onset and baseline interview. Thirteen percent of 521 patients (86% follow-up) experienced chronic pain at 6 months and 19% of 443 patients at 2 years. At 6 months, 54% had experienced at least 1 LBP recurrence, and 47% in the subsequent 18 months.
The prognosis of strictly defined acute LBP, with or without sciatica, is less favorable than commonly stated in practice guidelines based on failure to return to work. Broad initiatives to develop new means for the primary and secondary prevention of recurrent and chronic LBP are urgently needed.
前瞻性队列研究。
评估美国初级保健环境中出现急性腰痛(LBP)患者的预后。
基于重返工作岗位结果的急性 LBP 实践指南低估了初级保健环境中慢性疼痛的发展。由于纳入标准、慢性疼痛定义和国家卫生系统的差异,预后队列研究报告的结果范围广泛,限制了其解释和推广。目前缺乏针对美国初级保健系统急性 LBP 的精心设计的预后研究的相关数据。
在出现急性 LBP(伴或不伴坐骨神经痛)后,在症状持续时间长达 30 天且过去 12 个月内无发作且无脊柱手术史的情况下,加入大型医疗服务组织的成员。我们在基线、6 个月和 2 年时进行了电话访谈。基于受试者工作特征分析,将整体感知恢复与疼痛强度相结合作为慢性疼痛的主要结局。评估了复发和多个次要结局,以允许与其他研究进行比较。
605 例患者的平均疼痛强度为 5.6(数字评分量表= 0-10),残疾程度为 15.8(罗伦兹-莫里斯量表= 0-24)。8%的患者在疼痛发作和基线访谈之间请病假。521 例患者中有 13%(86%的随访患者)在 6 个月时出现慢性疼痛,443 例患者中有 19%在 2 年时出现慢性疼痛。在 6 个月时,54%的患者至少经历过 1 次 LBP 复发,在接下来的 18 个月里,47%的患者经历过复发。
与基于未能重返工作岗位的实践指南相比,严格定义的伴有或不伴有坐骨神经痛的急性 LBP 的预后较差。迫切需要开展广泛的举措,以制定新的方法来预防复发性和慢性 LBP 的发生和发展。