Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology Program, Cambridge, MA 02215, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Oct;27(10):2144-51. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1658.
To better understand the biomechanical mechanisms underlying the association between hyperkyphosis of the thoracic spine and risk of vertebral fracture and other degenerative spinal pathology, we used a previously validated musculoskeletal model of the spine to determine how thoracic kyphosis angle and spinal posture affect vertebral compressive loading. We simulated an age-related increase in thoracic kyphosis (T(1) -T(12) Cobb angle 50-75 degrees) during two different activities (relaxed standing and standing with 5-kg weights in the hands) and three different posture conditions: (1) an increase in thoracic kyphosis with no postural adjustment (uncompensated posture); (2) an increase in thoracic kyphosis with a concomitant increase in pelvic tilt that maintains a stable center of mass and horizontal eye gaze (compensated posture); and (3) an increase in thoracic kyphosis with a concomitant increase in lumbar lordosis that also maintains a stable center of mass and horizontal eye gaze (congruent posture). For all posture conditions, compressive loading increased with increasing thoracic kyphosis, with loading increasing more in the thoracolumbar and lumbar regions than in the mid-thoracic region. Loading increased the most for the uncompensated posture, followed by the compensated posture, with the congruent posture almost completely mitigating any increases in loading with increased thoracic kyphosis. These findings indicate that both thoracic kyphosis and spinal posture influence vertebral loading during daily activities, implying that thoracic kyphosis measurements alone are not sufficient to characterize the impact of spinal curvature on vertebral loading.
为了更好地理解胸脊柱后凸与椎体骨折风险和其他退行性脊柱病变之间的生物力学机制,我们使用了先前经过验证的脊柱肌肉骨骼模型来确定胸椎后凸角度和脊柱姿势如何影响椎体压缩负荷。我们模拟了两种不同活动(放松站立和双手持 5 公斤重物站立)期间胸脊柱后凸(T1-T12 Cobb 角 50-75 度)的年龄相关性增加,以及三种不同姿势条件:(1)胸脊柱后凸增加而无姿势调整(无补偿姿势);(2)胸脊柱后凸增加,同时骨盆倾斜增加,以保持稳定的质心和水平视线(补偿姿势);(3)胸脊柱后凸增加,同时腰椎前凸增加,也保持稳定的质心和水平视线(一致姿势)。对于所有姿势条件,随着胸脊柱后凸的增加,压缩负荷增加,胸腰椎和腰椎区域的负荷增加多于中胸区域。无补偿姿势的负荷增加最多,其次是补偿姿势,而一致姿势几乎完全减轻了胸脊柱后凸增加导致的任何负荷增加。这些发现表明,胸脊柱后凸和脊柱姿势都会影响日常活动中的椎体负荷,这意味着仅测量胸脊柱后凸不足以描述脊柱曲率对椎体负荷的影响。