• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人软组织肉瘤手术中切缘的临界研究。

Critical study of resection margins in adult soft-tissue sarcoma surgery.

机构信息

Clinique chirurgicale orthopédique, CHU de Nantes, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44000 Nantes, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4 Suppl):S9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.04.006
PMID:22595258
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Resection margins constitute a recognized risk factor for local recurrence, but their impact on survival is less clear.

HYPOTHESIS

Infiltrative proliferation and satellite nodules are prognostic factors for local and systemic aggressiveness.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 105 patients under curative treatment, resection quality was assessed on UICC criteria (R0/R1) and on a modified version (R0M/R1M) taking account of proliferation contours and satellite nodules for narrow margins (<1mm). Uni- and multi-variate analysis was performed, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared on log-rank.

RESULTS

Mean 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 0.64 [0.52-0.76] after R1 surgery, 0.9 [0.85-0.95] after R0, 0.64 [0.519-0.751] after R1M and 0.92 [0.87-0.96] after R0M. Resection type according to R classification correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.028), but not with metastasis-free survival (MFS) (P=0.156). Resection type according to RM classification correlated with DFS and MFS. Multivariate analysis disclosed correlations between LRFS rate and RM resection type (HR 6.77 [1.78-25.7], P=0.005), DFS rate and RM resection type (HR 2.83 [1.47-5.43], P=0.001) and grade (HR=3.17 [1.38-7.27], P=0.003), and MFS and grade (HR=3.96 [1.50-10.5], P=0.006).

DISCUSSION

The microscopic aspect of the proliferation contours and presence of satellite nodules were confirmed as prognostic factors for local and systemic aggressiveness. They impact both disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival in case of margins less than 1mm. Their systematic consideration may help identify patients with elevated systemic risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

简介

切除边缘是局部复发的公认危险因素,但它们对生存的影响尚不清楚。

假设

浸润性增殖和卫星结节是局部和全身侵袭性的预后因素。

研究类型

回顾性队列研究。

患者和方法

在 105 例接受根治性治疗的患者中,根据 UICC 标准(R0/R1)和改良版本(考虑到狭窄边缘(<1mm)的增殖轮廓和卫星结节)评估切除质量(R0M/R1M)。进行单变量和多变量分析,并在对数秩检验上比较 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线。

结果

R1 手术后的 5 年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)为 0.64 [0.52-0.76],R0 手术后为 0.9 [0.85-0.95],R1M 手术后为 0.64 [0.519-0.751],R0M 手术后为 0.92 [0.87-0.96]。根据 R 分类的切除类型与无病生存(DFS)相关(P=0.028),但与无转移生存(MFS)无关(P=0.156)。根据 RM 分类的切除类型与 DFS 和 MFS 相关。多变量分析显示,LRFS 率与 RM 切除类型(HR 6.77 [1.78-25.7],P=0.005)、DFS 率与 RM 切除类型(HR 2.83 [1.47-5.43],P=0.001)和分级(HR=3.17 [1.38-7.27],P=0.003)以及 MFS 和分级(HR=3.96 [1.50-10.5],P=0.006)相关。

讨论

增殖轮廓的微观外观和卫星结节的存在被证实是局部和全身侵袭性的预后因素。它们在边缘小于 1mm 的情况下,既影响无病生存,也影响无转移生存。系统考虑这些因素可能有助于识别系统风险升高的患者。

证据等级

IV。

相似文献

1
Critical study of resection margins in adult soft-tissue sarcoma surgery.成人软组织肉瘤手术中切缘的临界研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4 Suppl):S9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 May 15.
2
The width of resection margins influences local recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma patients.手术切缘宽度影响软组织肉瘤患者的局部复发。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;42(6):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
3
Soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: the prognostic significance of adequate surgical margins in primary operation and reoperation after recurrence.四肢软组织肉瘤:原发手术和复发后再次手术时适当的手术切缘对预后的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(8):2102-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0997-0. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
4
Can Multistate Modeling of Local Recurrence, Distant Metastasis, and Death Improve the Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcomas?局部复发、远处转移和死亡的多状态模型能否改善软组织肉瘤患者结局的预测?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1427-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5232-x. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
5
Prospective evaluation of quality of surgery in soft tissue sarcoma.软组织肉瘤手术质量的前瞻性评估。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Dec;32(10):1242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
6
Favorable outcome after complete resection in elderly soft tissue sarcoma patients: Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group study.老年软组织肉瘤患者完全切除后的良好结果:日本肌肉骨骼肿瘤学组研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;40(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
7
Pelvic chondrosarcomas: surgical treatment options.骨盆软骨肉瘤:手术治疗选择。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Oct;95(6):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Oct 3.
8
Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: an analysis of 1225 patients.采用保肢手术和放射治疗的局限性软组织肉瘤患者的预后因素:1225例患者的分析
Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2530-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11365.
9
Surgical margins and reresection in the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma using conservative surgery and radiation therapy.软组织肉瘤患者采用保守手术和放射治疗时的手术切缘与再次切除
Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2544-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11367.
10
Soft-tissue sarcoma of the thigh: surgical margin influences local recurrence but not survival in 152 patients.大腿软组织肉瘤:手术切缘对152例患者的局部复发有影响,但对生存率无影响。
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Feb;72(1):72-7. doi: 10.1080/000164701753606734.

引用本文的文献

1
The lighthouse technique for humeral suspension following a modified Tikhoff-Linberg procedure for the resection of bone and soft tissue tumors around the shoulder girdle: clinical and functional outcomes.在改良的蒂科夫-林伯格手术切除肩胛带周围骨与软组织肿瘤后,采用灯塔技术进行肱骨悬吊:临床及功能结果
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 3;35(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04351-z.
2
Toward the use of diffuse reflection spectroscopy for intra-operative tissue discrimination during sarcoma surgery.探讨应用漫反射光谱技术在肉瘤手术中进行术中组织鉴别。
J Biomed Opt. 2024 Feb;29(2):027001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.2.027001. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Naturally occurring canine sarcomas: Bridging the gap from mouse models to human patients through cross-disciplinary research partnerships.
自然发生的犬类肉瘤:通过跨学科研究合作弥合从小鼠模型到人类患者的差距。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 23;13:1130215. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1130215. eCollection 2023.
4
Superficial soft tissue sarcomas: 10‑year survival outcomes.浅表软组织肉瘤:10年生存结果
Oncol Lett. 2023 Jan 27;25(3):96. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13682. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
[Tumor Margin Infiltration in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Prediction Using 3T MRI Texture Analysis].[软组织肉瘤中的肿瘤边缘浸润:使用3T MRI纹理分析进行预测]
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022 Jan;83(1):112-126. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0037. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Overall survival in patients with re-excision of positive microscopic margins of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma operated outside of a reference center: a nationwide cohort analysis.切缘阳性的肢体和躯干壁软组织肉瘤患者在非参考中心行再次切除术的总生存率:一项全国性队列分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 3;22(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5.
7
Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns.就诊距离更远与软组织肉瘤患者的生存率提高相关:美国全国范围内的模式。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252381. eCollection 2021.
8
Margin Assessment in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Review of the Literature.软组织肉瘤的切缘评估:文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 2;13(7):1687. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071687.
9
The Effect of Resection Margin on Local Recurrence and Survival in High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities: How Far Is Far Enough?切缘对肢体高级别软组织肉瘤局部复发及生存的影响:多远才算足够?
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 8;12(9):2560. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092560.
10
Deep Functional and Molecular Characterization of a High-Risk Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma.高危未分化多形性肉瘤的深度功能与分子特征分析
Sarcoma. 2020 May 4;2020:6312480. doi: 10.1155/2020/6312480. eCollection 2020.