• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨密度对胸腰椎植入物固定的影响。椎弓根螺钉、椎板钩和棘突钢丝的比较研究。

Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires.

作者信息

Coe J D, Warden K E, Herzig M A, McAfee P C

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Sep;15(9):902-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199009000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199009000-00012
PMID:2259978
Abstract

Posteriorly directed load to failure testing of four different types of spinal implants was performed in individual T5 to S1 vertebra harvested from seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines. The implants tested were: 1) Drummond spinous process wires, 2) Harrington laminar hooks, 3) Cotrel-Dubousset transpedicular screws, and 4) Steffee VSP transpedicular screws. The ultimate failure of each implant was compared with the bone mineral density of each vertebra to determine which implants, if any, were particularly advantageous in osteoporotic vertebrae. Before biomechanical testing, the spines were analyzed in vitro by dual photon absorptiometry to determine the bone mineral densities (gm/cm2) of each vertebra. The mean tensile loads to failure for each of the implants tested were as follows: Cotrel-Dubousset transpedicular screws: 345 Newtons; spinous process wire/button: 382 Newtons; Steffee transpedicular screws: 430 Newtons; and laminar hooks: 646 Newtons. The difference between the loads to failure for laminar hooks and the other implants was significant (P less than 0.05) using one-way analysis of variance. The overall correlation coefficient for bone mineral density with ultimate load to failure was 0.30 (P less than 0.001). The correlation coefficients were 0.47 (P less than 0.001) for spinous process wires alone; 0.096 (not significant) for laminar hooks alone; 0.37 (P less than 0.001) for Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws; and 0.48 (P less than 0.001) for Steffee pedicle screws. Of the four different implants tested, laminar hooks were most resistant to failure from posteriorly directed forces.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对从七具新鲜冷冻人体尸体脊柱上获取的单个T5至S1椎体进行了四种不同类型脊柱植入物的后向加载至失效测试。所测试的植入物包括:1)德拉蒙德棘突钢丝;2)哈灵顿椎板钩;3) Cotrel-Dubousset椎弓根螺钉;4) Steffee VSP椎弓根螺钉。将每个植入物的最终失效情况与每个椎体的骨矿物质密度进行比较,以确定哪些植入物(如果有的话)在骨质疏松性椎体中具有特别优势。在进行生物力学测试之前,通过双能光子吸收法对脊柱进行体外分析,以确定每个椎体的骨矿物质密度(克/平方厘米)。所测试的每种植入物的平均拉伸失效载荷如下:Cotrel-Dubousset椎弓根螺钉:345牛顿;棘突钢丝/纽扣:382牛顿;Steffee椎弓根螺钉:430牛顿;椎板钩:646牛顿。使用单因素方差分析,椎板钩与其他植入物的失效载荷差异具有显著性(P小于0.05)。骨矿物质密度与最终失效载荷的总体相关系数为0.30(P小于0.001)。单独的棘突钢丝的相关系数为0.47(P小于0.001);单独的椎板钩为0.096(无显著性);Cotrel-Dubousset椎弓根螺钉为0.37(P小于0.001);Steffee椎弓根螺钉为0.48(P小于0.001)。在所测试的四种不同植入物中,椎板钩对后向力引起的失效最具抵抗力。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires.骨密度对胸腰椎植入物固定的影响。椎弓根螺钉、椎板钩和棘突钢丝的比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Sep;15(9):902-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199009000-00012.
2
Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density.胸椎椎弓根螺钉与钩在轴向和切向固定强度与骨密度的关系
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 May 1;27(9):937-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200205010-00010.
3
A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.胸腰椎固定中,对椎板下钩作为椎板上钩替代物的生物力学评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):967-71. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214932.49027.6a.
4
Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis.使用椎板钩、椎板下钢丝或磷酸钙骨水泥强化后骨质疏松性脊柱中的椎弓根螺钉运动:一项对比分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 15;29(16):1723-30. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134569.63542.49.
5
Triangulation of pedicular instrumentation. A biomechanical analysis.椎弓根内固定的三角测量法。一项生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6 Suppl):S270-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00019.
6
An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicle screw and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine.一种用于骨质疏松性脊柱的椎弓根螺钉与椎板钩联合方法的实验研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 May 1;22(9):958-62; discussion 963. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00004.
7
Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae.评估正常胸椎和骨质疏松性胸椎后路内固定系统的拔出强度和失败机制。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Oct;13(4):469-76. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09764.
8
Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.皮质骨螺钉与椎弓根螺钉在骨质疏松性腰椎中的生物力学固定特性:一项体外人体尸体模型研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Oct;25(4):467-476. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151046. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.胸椎椎弓根螺钉与椎弓根及椎板钩的生物力学评估
Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.015.
10
The mechanical role of laminar hook protection of pedicle screws at the caudal end vertebra.椎弓根螺钉在尾端椎体处的椎板钩保护的力学作用。
Eur Spine J. 1997;6(4):245-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01322446.

引用本文的文献

1
Advantages of Combined Use of Claw Hooks and Sublaminar Wires as the Upper Foundation of Long Fixation from the Thoracic Spine to the Pelvis in Osteoporotic Cases: A Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Junction Stress.在骨质疏松病例中,联合使用爪形钩和椎板下钢丝作为从胸椎到骨盆长节段固定的上部基础的优势:近端交界区应力的有限元分析
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Aug 30;9(2):202-210. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0169. eCollection 2025 Mar 27.
2
Optimizing bone health for the prevention of revision adult spinal deformity surgery: a break-even analysis.优化骨骼健康以预防成人脊柱畸形翻修手术:一项盈亏平衡分析。
Spine Deform. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01070-7.
3
Bone Health Optimization in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients: A Narrative Review.
成人脊柱畸形患者的骨骼健康优化:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 19;13(16):4891. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164891.
4
Use of Hartshill Rectangle with Sublaminar Wiring in Spinal Stabilization of D4-D5 Fracture Dislocation with Acute Spinal Cord Injury - A Cost-Effective Treatment.哈茨希尔矩形联合椎板下钢丝固定术在D4-D5骨折脱位伴急性脊髓损伤脊柱稳定中的应用——一种经济有效的治疗方法
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Aug;14(8):179-184. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i08.4692.
5
Technical aspects of rod-insertion forceps (persuader) application in reducing construct failure after lumbar spine fusion surgery: a biomechanical cadaveric study in Germany.腰椎融合手术后使用棒插入钳(说服器)减少内固定失败的技术要点:德国的一项生物力学尸体研究
Asian Spine J. 2024 Aug;18(4):493-499. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0073. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Osteoporosis on Reoperation Rates and Complications after Surgical Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disease.骨质疏松对腰椎退变性疾病手术治疗后再手术率及并发症影响的系统评价与Meta分析
J Bone Metab. 2024 May;31(2):114-131. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2024.31.2.114. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
The Effect of Osteoporosis on Complications and Reoperation Rates After Surgical Management of Adult Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.骨质疏松对成人胸腰椎脊柱畸形手术治疗后并发症及再次手术率的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2024 Nov;14(8):2420-2439. doi: 10.1177/21925682241250031. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Patients with Osteoporosis Undergoing Spine Fusion Surgery in Japan.日本接受脊柱融合手术的骨质疏松症患者的临床和经济结果
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Oct 13;8(2):163-170. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0175. eCollection 2024 Mar 27.
9
The Role of Bone Mineral Density in a Successful Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review.骨密度在腰椎椎间融合成功中的作用:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Feb 22;16(2):e54727. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54727. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Risk factors of instrumentation failure after laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF).后路减压融合术后器械失败的危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07116-z.