• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量误差对相对风险回归的影响。

The effects of measurement errors on relative risk regressions.

作者信息

Armstrong B G

机构信息

School of Occupational Health, McGill U., Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Dec;132(6):1176-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115761.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115761
PMID:2260550
Abstract

This paper concerns the effects of random error in numerical measurements of risk factors (covariates) in relative risk regressions. When not dependent on outcome (nondifferential), such error usually attenuates relative risk estimates (shifts them toward one) and leads to spuriously narrow confidence intervals. The presence of measurement error also reduces precision of estimates and power of significance tests. However, significance levels obtained by using the approximate measurements are usually valid and as powerful as possible given the measurement error. The attenuation in risk estimate depends not only on the size (variance) of the measurement error, but also on its distributional form, on whether it is dependent on the true level of the risk factor (whether it is of "Berkson" type), on the variance and distributional form of true levels of the risk factor, on the functional form of the regression (exponential or linear), and on the confounding variables included in the model. Error in measuring confounding variables leads to loss of control of confounding, leaving residual bias. Uncomplicated techniques of correcting the effects of measurement error in simple models in which distributions are assumed normal are available in the statistical literature. For these corrections, information on measurement error variance is required. Some approaches appropriate for more general models have been proposed, but these appear to be insufficiently developed for routine application.

摘要

本文关注相对风险回归中风险因素(协变量)数值测量中的随机误差的影响。当不依赖于结果(无差异)时,这种误差通常会减弱相对风险估计值(使其向1偏移),并导致置信区间虚假变窄。测量误差的存在还会降低估计的精度和显著性检验的功效。然而,使用近似测量值获得的显著性水平通常是有效的,并且在存在测量误差的情况下尽可能具有强大的功效。风险估计值的减弱不仅取决于测量误差的大小(方差),还取决于其分布形式、是否依赖于风险因素的真实水平(是否为“伯克森”类型)、风险因素真实水平的方差和分布形式、回归的函数形式(指数或线性)以及模型中包含的混杂变量。测量混杂变量时的误差会导致对混杂因素的控制失效,从而留下残余偏差。统计文献中提供了在假设分布为正态的简单模型中校正测量误差影响的简单技术。对于这些校正,需要测量误差方差的信息。已经提出了一些适用于更一般模型的方法,但这些方法似乎尚未充分发展到可用于常规应用的程度。

相似文献

1
The effects of measurement errors on relative risk regressions.测量误差对相对风险回归的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Dec;132(6):1176-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115761.
2
When measurement errors correlate with truth: surprising effects of nondifferential misclassification.当测量误差与真值相关时:无差异错误分类的惊人影响。
Epidemiology. 1995 Mar;6(2):157-61. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199503000-00012.
3
Mixtures of Berkson and classical covariate measurement error in the linear mixed model: Bias analysis and application to a study on ultrafine particles.线性混合模型中伯克森误差与经典协变量测量误差的混合:偏差分析及其在超细颗粒物研究中的应用
Biom J. 2018 May;60(3):480-497. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600188. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures.测量误差对环境与职业暴露流行病学研究的影响。
Occup Environ Med. 1998 Oct;55(10):651-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.10.651.
5
Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error.校正测量误差的逻辑回归相对风险估计值和置信区间:多协变量存在测量误差的情况
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;132(4):734-45. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115715.
6
Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.由于测量暴露时的非差异误差导致的多种偏差形式。
Epidemiology. 1994 Sep;5(5):510-7.
7
Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: correlated errors.测量误差与强混杂因素的共振:相关误差
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jul 1;150(1):88-96. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009922.
9
Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.仪器误差与方法一致性评估。
AANA J. 1996 Jun;64(3):261-8.
10
Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology.环境流行病学中暴露测量误差对混杂因素识别的影响。
Stat Med. 2003 Oct 15;22(19):3089-100. doi: 10.1002/sim.1541.

引用本文的文献

1
Pooling Biospecimens for Efficient Exposure Assessment When Using Case-Cohort Analysis in Cohort Studies.在队列研究中使用病例队列分析时合并生物标本以进行高效暴露评估。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Dec;132(12):127004. doi: 10.1289/EHP14476. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Association of Duration of Recognized Hypertension and Stroke Risk: The REGARDS Study.已确诊高血压的病程与中风风险的关联:REGARDS研究。
Stroke. 2025 Jan;56(1):105-112. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048385. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3
Occupational exposure to benzene and mortality risk of lymphohaematopoietic cancers in the Swiss National Cohort.
瑞士国家队列研究中职业性苯暴露与淋巴血液系统癌症死亡风险。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Jul 1;50(5):351-358. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4164. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
Does adjustment for non-differential misclassification of dichotomous exposure induce positive bias if there is no true association?如果不存在真实关联,对二分类暴露的非差异性错误分类进行校正是否会导致正向偏倚?
Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 3;7:100132. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100132. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
A Dose of Reality About Dose-Response Relationships.剂量-反应关系的一剂现实。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Dec;38(16):3604-3609. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08395-x. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
6
Diet Data Collected Using 48-h Dietary Recall: Within-and Between-Person Variation.使用48小时膳食回顾法收集的饮食数据:个体内和个体间差异
Front Nutr. 2021 Jul 6;8:667031. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.667031. eCollection 2021.
7
Household mold exposure interacts with inflammation-related genetic variants on childhood asthma: a case-control study.家庭霉菌暴露与炎症相关的遗传变异在儿童哮喘中的相互作用:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Apr 2;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01484-9.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of long term outdoor nitrogen dioxide exposure and mortality.系统评价和队列研究的荟萃分析,长期户外二氧化氮暴露与死亡率。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246451. eCollection 2021.
9
Cumulative Occupational Exposures and Lung-Function Decline in Two Large General-Population Cohorts.累积职业暴露与两大人群队列肺功能下降的关系。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Feb;18(2):238-246. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-113OC.
10
Diesel Engine Exhaust Exposure, Smoking, and Lung Cancer Subtype Risks. A Pooled Exposure-Response Analysis of 14 Case-Control Studies.柴油机废气暴露、吸烟与肺癌亚型风险。14 项病例对照研究的 pooled 暴露-反应分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 1;202(3):402-411. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201911-2101OC.