Nagore L, Soler C, Gil L, Serra I, Soler G, Redondo J I
Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, Valencia, España.
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jun;36(3):222-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01405.x. Epub 2012 May 20.
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effects of dexmedetomidine, both alone and combined with pethidine or butorphanol, in cats. A prospective randomized blind study was performed. Thirty cats were randomly assigned to three groups of 10 animals: D: dexmedetomidine (20 μg/kg IM); DP: dexmedetomidine (10 μg/kg IM) and pethidine (2.5 mg/kg IM); DB: dexmedetomidine (10 μg/kg IM) and butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg IM). Quality of sedation, analgesia, muscle relaxation and the possibility of performing some clinical procedures were compared using a multifactorial scale. Sedation, analgesia and muscle relaxation increased progressively over time and did not differ in the three protocols. The three protocols facilitated the completion of several clinical procedures. The clinical variables studied showed a similar behaviour in the three protocols and remained close to the baseline, except for a drop in heart rate in protocol D. In conclusion, dexmedetomidine, either alone or combined with pethidine or butorphanol, offers suitable sedation, analgesia and relaxation to perform various clinical procedures in cats.
本研究的目的是评估右美托咪定单独使用以及与哌替啶或布托啡诺联合使用对猫的临床效果。进行了一项前瞻性随机盲法研究。30只猫被随机分为三组,每组10只动物:D组:右美托咪定(20μg/kg肌肉注射);DP组:右美托咪定(10μg/kg肌肉注射)和哌替啶(2.5mg/kg肌肉注射);DB组:右美托咪定(10μg/kg肌肉注射)和布托啡诺(0.4mg/kg肌肉注射)。使用多因素量表比较镇静、镇痛、肌肉松弛的质量以及进行一些临床操作的可能性。镇静、镇痛和肌肉松弛随时间逐渐增加,三种方案之间无差异。三种方案均有助于完成多项临床操作。所研究的临床变量在三种方案中表现出相似的行为,且除D组心率下降外,均保持接近基线水平。总之,右美托咪定单独使用或与哌替啶或布托啡诺联合使用,可为猫进行各种临床操作提供合适的镇静、镇痛和松弛效果。