Suppr超能文献

痛觉屈反射阈值、脑电双频指数、复合变异指数和伤害性刺激反应指数在全麻期间用于评估痛觉的效用。

Utility of Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold, Bispectral Index, Composite Variability Index and Noxious Stimulation Response Index as measures for nociception during general anaesthesia.

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2012 Aug;67(8):899-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07187.x. Epub 2012 May 18.

Abstract

Movement and haemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli during general anaesthesia are regarded as signs of nociception. We compared the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold (NFRT), Bispectral Index (BIS), Composite Variability Index (CVI), Noxious Stimulation Response Index (NSRI) and the calculated propofol/remifentanil effect-compartment concentrations (Ce) as predictors for such responses in 50 female subjects at laryngeal mask airway insertion and skin incision. The following prediction probabilities (PK-values) were obtained at laryngeal mask airway insertion and skin incision, respectively. For movement responses: NFRT = 0.77 and 0.72; p = 0.0001 and 0.004, respectively; BIS = 0.41 and 0.56, p = 0.29 and 0.5, respectively; CVI = 0.48 and 0.57, p = 0.76 and 0.88, respectively; NSRI = 0.49 and 0.76, p = 0.92 and 0.0001, respectively; propofol-Ce = 0.35 and 0.66, p = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively; remifentanil-Ce = 0.68 and 0.72, p = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively. For heart rate responses: NFRT = 0.68 and 0.75, p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively; BIS = 0.37 and 0.59, p = 0.15 and 0.41, respectively; CVI = 0.41 and 0.44, p = 0.39 and 0.37, respectively; NSRI = 0.48 and 0.53, p = 0.84 and 0.78, respectively; propofol-Ce = 0.42 and 0.56, p = 0.39 and 0.53, respectively; remifentanil-Ce = 0.58 and 0.54, p = 0.35 and 0.73, respectively. We conclude that the NFRT best predicts movement and heart rate responses to noxious stimuli. Effect-compartment concentrations and NSRI also predict movement (but not heart rate) responses satisfactorily.

摘要

在全身麻醉期间,对有害刺激的运动和血液动力学反应被认为是伤害感受的迹象。我们比较了伤害性屈肌反射阈值(NFRT)、双谱指数(BIS)、综合变异指数(CVI)、伤害性刺激反应指数(NSRI)和计算的丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼效应室浓度(Ce),以预测 50 名女性在插入喉罩和切开皮肤时的这些反应。在插入喉罩和切开皮肤时,分别获得以下预测概率(PK 值)。对于运动反应:NFRT=0.77 和 0.72;p=0.0001 和 0.004;BIS=0.41 和 0.56;p=0.29 和 0.5;CVI=0.48 和 0.57;p=0.76 和 0.88;NSRI=0.49 和 0.76;p=0.92 和 0.0001;丙泊酚-Ce=0.35 和 0.66;p=0.04 和 0.03;瑞芬太尼-Ce=0.68 和 0.72;p=0.01 和 0.003。对于心率反应:NFRT=0.68 和 0.75;p=0.04 和 0.01;BIS=0.37 和 0.59;p=0.15 和 0.41;CVI=0.41 和 0.44;p=0.39 和 0.37;NSRI=0.48 和 0.53;p=0.84 和 0.78;丙泊酚-Ce=0.42 和 0.56;p=0.39 和 0.53;瑞芬太尼-Ce=0.58 和 0.54;p=0.35 和 0.73。我们得出结论,NFRT 最能预测有害刺激引起的运动和心率反应。效应室浓度和 NSRI 也能很好地预测运动(但不是心率)反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验