• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痛觉屈反射阈值、脑电双频指数、复合变异指数和伤害性刺激反应指数在全麻期间用于评估痛觉的效用。

Utility of Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold, Bispectral Index, Composite Variability Index and Noxious Stimulation Response Index as measures for nociception during general anaesthesia.

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2012 Aug;67(8):899-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07187.x. Epub 2012 May 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07187.x
PMID:22607648
Abstract

Movement and haemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli during general anaesthesia are regarded as signs of nociception. We compared the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold (NFRT), Bispectral Index (BIS), Composite Variability Index (CVI), Noxious Stimulation Response Index (NSRI) and the calculated propofol/remifentanil effect-compartment concentrations (Ce) as predictors for such responses in 50 female subjects at laryngeal mask airway insertion and skin incision. The following prediction probabilities (PK-values) were obtained at laryngeal mask airway insertion and skin incision, respectively. For movement responses: NFRT = 0.77 and 0.72; p = 0.0001 and 0.004, respectively; BIS = 0.41 and 0.56, p = 0.29 and 0.5, respectively; CVI = 0.48 and 0.57, p = 0.76 and 0.88, respectively; NSRI = 0.49 and 0.76, p = 0.92 and 0.0001, respectively; propofol-Ce = 0.35 and 0.66, p = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively; remifentanil-Ce = 0.68 and 0.72, p = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively. For heart rate responses: NFRT = 0.68 and 0.75, p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively; BIS = 0.37 and 0.59, p = 0.15 and 0.41, respectively; CVI = 0.41 and 0.44, p = 0.39 and 0.37, respectively; NSRI = 0.48 and 0.53, p = 0.84 and 0.78, respectively; propofol-Ce = 0.42 and 0.56, p = 0.39 and 0.53, respectively; remifentanil-Ce = 0.58 and 0.54, p = 0.35 and 0.73, respectively. We conclude that the NFRT best predicts movement and heart rate responses to noxious stimuli. Effect-compartment concentrations and NSRI also predict movement (but not heart rate) responses satisfactorily.

摘要

在全身麻醉期间,对有害刺激的运动和血液动力学反应被认为是伤害感受的迹象。我们比较了伤害性屈肌反射阈值(NFRT)、双谱指数(BIS)、综合变异指数(CVI)、伤害性刺激反应指数(NSRI)和计算的丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼效应室浓度(Ce),以预测 50 名女性在插入喉罩和切开皮肤时的这些反应。在插入喉罩和切开皮肤时,分别获得以下预测概率(PK 值)。对于运动反应:NFRT=0.77 和 0.72;p=0.0001 和 0.004;BIS=0.41 和 0.56;p=0.29 和 0.5;CVI=0.48 和 0.57;p=0.76 和 0.88;NSRI=0.49 和 0.76;p=0.92 和 0.0001;丙泊酚-Ce=0.35 和 0.66;p=0.04 和 0.03;瑞芬太尼-Ce=0.68 和 0.72;p=0.01 和 0.003。对于心率反应:NFRT=0.68 和 0.75;p=0.04 和 0.01;BIS=0.37 和 0.59;p=0.15 和 0.41;CVI=0.41 和 0.44;p=0.39 和 0.37;NSRI=0.48 和 0.53;p=0.84 和 0.78;丙泊酚-Ce=0.42 和 0.56;p=0.39 和 0.53;瑞芬太尼-Ce=0.58 和 0.54;p=0.35 和 0.73。我们得出结论,NFRT 最能预测有害刺激引起的运动和心率反应。效应室浓度和 NSRI 也能很好地预测运动(但不是心率)反应。

相似文献

1
Utility of Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold, Bispectral Index, Composite Variability Index and Noxious Stimulation Response Index as measures for nociception during general anaesthesia.痛觉屈反射阈值、脑电双频指数、复合变异指数和伤害性刺激反应指数在全麻期间用于评估痛觉的效用。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Aug;67(8):899-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07187.x. Epub 2012 May 18.
2
Utility of nociceptive flexion reflex threshold and bispectral index to predict movement responses under propofol anaesthesia.伤害性屈曲反射阈值和脑电双频指数在预测丙泊酚麻醉下运动反应中的应用
Somatosens Mot Res. 2017 Jun;34(2):139-144. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2017.1343189. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
3
The response of the composite variability index to a standardized noxious stimulus during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.复合变异指数对丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间标准化伤害性刺激的反应。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Mar;116(3):580-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ced18. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
4
Monitoring hypnotic effect and nociception with two EEG-derived indices, qCON and qNOX, during general anaesthesia.在全身麻醉期间,使用两个脑电图衍生指标qCON和qNOX监测催眠效果和伤害感受。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):933-41. doi: 10.1111/aas.12359. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.伤害性刺激对丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉时镇痛-伤害觉指数(ANI)的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet019. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Increased variation of the response index of nociception during noxious stimulation in patients during general anaesthesia.在全身麻醉期间,患者在受到伤害性刺激时,伤害感受反应指数的变化增加。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Nov;104(2):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
7
Noxious stimulation response index: a novel anesthetic state index based on hypnotic-opioid interaction.有害刺激反应指数:一种基于催眠-阿片类药物相互作用的新型麻醉状态指数。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):872-80. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d40368.
8
Comparisons of Electroencephalographically Derived Measures of Hypnosis and Antinociception in Response to Standardized Stimuli During Target-Controlled Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia.在靶控丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,对标准化刺激做出反应时,脑电图衍生的催眠和抗伤害感受指标的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):382-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001029.
9
Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index.使用 RIII 反射阈和双频谱指数监测异丙酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉时对有害刺激的反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):201-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep357. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
10
Nociceptive stimuli responses at different levels of general anaesthesia and genetic variability.不同全身麻醉深度和遗传变异性的伤害性刺激反应。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Jan;57(1):89-99. doi: 10.1111/aas.12017. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
PERSONALISED PAIN TREATMENT IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS - MONITORING OF NOCICEPTION.重症监护病房中的个性化疼痛治疗——伤害感受监测
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Nov;62(Suppl4):82-87. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s4.12.
2
Effect of the Location of Tetanic Stimulation on Autonomic Responses: A Randomized Cross-Over Pilot Study.强直刺激部位对自主反应的影响:一项随机交叉试点研究。
J Pain Res. 2024 Jan 9;17:209-217. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S443058. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of Nociception during Pediatric Surgery: A Topical Review.小儿外科手术中伤害感受的评估:专题综述
J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 30;13(2):260. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020260.
4
Different perspectives for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia.全身麻醉期间监测伤害感受的不同视角。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr;75(2):112-123. doi: 10.4097/kja.22002. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Measurement of the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold in critically ill patients - a randomized observational pilot study.危重患者伤害性屈肌反射阈值的测量——一项随机观察性初步研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01490-8.
6
Low-dose metformin treatment in the subacute phase improves the locomotor function of a mouse model of spinal cord injury.亚急性期低剂量二甲双胍治疗可改善脊髓损伤小鼠模型的运动功能。
Neural Regen Res. 2021 Nov;16(11):2234-2242. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.310695.
7
Effects of sedation on subjective perception of pain intensity and autonomic nervous responses to pain: A preliminary study.镇静对疼痛强度主观感受及疼痛自主神经反应的影响:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0183635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183635. eCollection 2017.
8
EEG Based Monitoring of General Anesthesia: Taking the Next Steps.基于脑电图的全身麻醉监测:迈向新征程
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Jun 22;11:56. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00056. eCollection 2017.
9
Comparison of the qCON and qNOX indices for the assessment of unconsciousness level and noxious stimulation response during surgery.用于评估手术期间意识水平和有害刺激反应的qCON和qNOX指数比较。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1273-1281. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9948-z. Epub 2016 Oct 20.