• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镇静对疼痛强度主观感受及疼痛自主神经反应的影响:一项初步研究。

Effects of sedation on subjective perception of pain intensity and autonomic nervous responses to pain: A preliminary study.

作者信息

Kang Hongling, Nakae Aya, Ito Hiroshi, Vitayaburananont Piyasak, Minamoto Takehiro, Ikeda Takashi, Osaka Mariko, Mashimo Takashi, Fujino Yuji, Hagihira Satoshi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0183635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183635. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0183635
PMID:28880899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5589124/
Abstract

Rather than relying solely on subjective pain evaluation using means such as the visual analogue scale (VAS), in clinical situations it is possible to observe evoked responses of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) as objective indicators. Few studies, however, have reported these relationships under finely controlled sedation. 16 healthy male participants were administrated in intravenous sedation with either propofol or midazolam randomly. We initially determined, using pharmacokinetic simulation, the effect-site concentration (Ce) of anaesthetic at loss of response to verbal command and eyelash reflex (Ce-LOR). Then subsequently adjusted Ce to 75%, 50%, and 25% of Ce-LOR to achieve deep, moderate, and light sedation. At awake control state and each sedation level, a noxious electrical stimulation was applied three times at the right forearm, an average pain intensity of the three stimuli was rated on a VAS (0-10). Changes in the peripheral perfusion index measured by oximetry were used as an indicator of ANS response. We analyzed the influence of sedation level on VAS and ANS responses compared to the awake control state. While ANS responses were similar in all conditions, VAS was statistically significantly lower in moderate (5.6±0.6, p <0.005) or deep (5.3±0.6, p <0.001) sedation than in the awake state (7.2±0.4). This study revealed that even when the ANS responds similarly to the same stimulation, subjective pain perception is attenuated by sedation. A cerebral mechanism other than that of the brainstem might determine subjective pain intensity.

摘要

在临床情况下,并非仅依靠使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)等手段进行主观疼痛评估,还可以观察自主神经系统(ANS)的诱发反应作为客观指标。然而,很少有研究报道在精细控制的镇静状态下这些关系。16名健康男性参与者被随机给予丙泊酚或咪达唑仑进行静脉镇静。我们首先使用药代动力学模拟确定麻醉药在对言语指令和睫毛反射无反应时的效应室浓度(Ce-LOR)。然后将Ce随后调整为Ce-LOR的75%、50%和25%,以实现深度、中度和轻度镇静。在清醒对照状态和每个镇静水平下,在右前臂施加三次有害电刺激,在VAS(0-10)上对三种刺激的平均疼痛强度进行评分。用血氧饱和度测定法测量的外周灌注指数变化用作ANS反应的指标。与清醒对照状态相比,我们分析了镇静水平对VAS和ANS反应的影响。虽然在所有情况下ANS反应相似,但中度(5.6±0.6,p<0.005)或深度(5.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/a08233db7896/pone.0183635.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/55eef29e4457/pone.0183635.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/ba6cdc740bfe/pone.0183635.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/6776cba268e5/pone.0183635.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/d224107d5223/pone.0183635.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/b6a76c30cdeb/pone.0183635.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/a08233db7896/pone.0183635.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/55eef29e4457/pone.0183635.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/ba6cdc740bfe/pone.0183635.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/6776cba268e5/pone.0183635.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/d224107d5223/pone.0183635.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/b6a76c30cdeb/pone.0183635.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5136/5589124/a08233db7896/pone.0183635.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of sedation on subjective perception of pain intensity and autonomic nervous responses to pain: A preliminary study.镇静对疼痛强度主观感受及疼痛自主神经反应的影响:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0183635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183635. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison of the Effect of Electrical Stimulations on the Chin Skin on Autonomic Nervous Activities During Propofol Sedation With or Without Midazolam.丙泊酚镇静期间联合或不联合咪达唑仑时电刺激颏部皮肤对自主神经活动影响的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;74(9):1751.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑或丙泊酚用于机械通气时间延长患者的镇静:两项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.
4
Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.结肠镜检查的患者自控镇静:一项随机试验,比较丙泊酚和阿芬太尼的患者自控给药与医生给予的咪达唑仑和哌替啶。
Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):683-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41519.
5
An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery.一项比较咪达唑仑/芬太尼静脉镇静(清醒镇静)与丙泊酚输注(深度镇静)用于美容手术的结局研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1683-9; discussion 1690-1. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000086363.34535.A4.
6
Propofol-alfentanyl versus midazolam-alfentanyl in inducing procedural amnesia of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children--blind randomised trial.丙泊酚-阿芬太尼与咪达唑仑-阿芬太尼用于诱导儿童上消化道内镜检查过程性遗忘的比较——盲法随机试验
Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Nov;174(11):1475-80. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2555-z. Epub 2015 May 9.
7
The effect of the assignment of a pre-sedation target level on procedural sedation using propofol.预先镇静目标水平的设定对使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;32(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.07.023. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
8
Safe and effective sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a randomized comparison between propofol continuous infusion and intermittent midazolam injection.在早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术中安全有效的镇静:丙泊酚持续输注与咪达唑仑间断注射的随机比较。
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;45(8):831-7. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0222-8. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
9
Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.使用双谱分析评估接受静脉清醒镇静患者的恢复情况。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.23366.
10
Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑及哌替啶用于胃肠内镜检查中的清醒镇静
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;95(6):1476-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02080.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Early peripheral perfusion monitoring in septic shock.早期外周灌注监测在感染性休克中的应用。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Sep 30;29(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02074-1.
2
Interpersonal touch interventions for patients in intensive care: A design-oriented realist review.重症监护患者的人际接触干预:一项基于设计的现实主义综述。
Nurs Open. 2018 Oct 24;6(2):216-235. doi: 10.1002/nop2.200. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Evaluation of the perfusion index according to the visual analog scale in postoperative patients.根据视觉模拟量表对术后患者灌注指数的评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of propofol on the medial temporal lobe emotional memory system: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects.丙泊酚对内侧颞叶情绪记忆系统的影响:一项针对人类受试者的功能磁共振成像研究
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;115 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i104-i113. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev038.
2
Monitoring hypnotic effect and nociception with two EEG-derived indices, qCON and qNOX, during general anaesthesia.在全身麻醉期间,使用两个脑电图衍生指标qCON和qNOX监测催眠效果和伤害感受。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):933-41. doi: 10.1111/aas.12359. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
3
Posterior cingulate cortex-related co-activation patterns: a resting state FMRI study in propofol-induced loss of consciousness.
Saudi Med J. 2018 Oct;39(10):1006-1010. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.10.23095.
4
Moderate sedation induced by general anaesthetics disrupts audio-spatial feature binding with sustained P3 components in healthy humans.全身麻醉诱导的中度镇静会破坏健康人音频空间特征与持续P3成分的结合。
Neurosci Conscious. 2018 Mar 5;2018(1):niy002. doi: 10.1093/nc/niy002. eCollection 2018.
后扣带回皮质相关的共激活模式:一项关于丙泊酚诱导意识丧失的静息态功能磁共振成像研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e100012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100012. eCollection 2014.
4
Age-related and sex-related changes in perfusion index in response to noxious electrical stimulation in healthy subjects.健康受试者对有害电刺激的血流灌注指数的年龄相关和性别相关变化。
J Pain Res. 2014 Feb 10;7:91-7. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S57140. eCollection 2014.
5
Effect of sedation on pain perception.镇静对疼痛感知的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):611-21. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318281592d.
6
Nociceptive stimuli responses at different levels of general anaesthesia and genetic variability.不同全身麻醉深度和遗传变异性的伤害性刺激反应。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Jan;57(1):89-99. doi: 10.1111/aas.12017. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Utility of Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold, Bispectral Index, Composite Variability Index and Noxious Stimulation Response Index as measures for nociception during general anaesthesia.痛觉屈反射阈值、脑电双频指数、复合变异指数和伤害性刺激反应指数在全麻期间用于评估痛觉的效用。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Aug;67(8):899-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07187.x. Epub 2012 May 18.
8
Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using 'the PainVision™ system' for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects.使用“PainVision™ 系统”评估健康受试者在去除伤口敷料材料过程中的疼痛强度测量,用于感知和疼痛感觉的定量分析。
Int Wound J. 2012 Aug;9(4):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00911.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
9
Brain functional integration decreases during propofol-induced loss of consciousness.脑功能整合在丙泊酚诱导的意识丧失过程中减少。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
10
Analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of propofol in a human pain model.丙泊酚在人体疼痛模型中的镇痛和抗痛觉过敏特性。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):421-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e33ac8.