Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):663-77. doi: 10.1037/a0028578. Epub 2012 May 21.
The authors investigated the effects of valence and arousal on memory using a dual-process model that quantifies recollective and nonrecollective components of recall without relying on metacognitive judgments to separate them. The results showed that valenced words increased reconstruction (a component of nonrecollective retrieval) relative to neutral words. In addition, the authors found that positive valence increased recollective retrieval in comparison to negative valence, whereas negative valence increased nonrecollective retrieval relative to positive valence. The latter effect, however, depended on arousal: It was reliable only when arousal was high. The present findings supported the notion that emotional valence is a conceptual gist because it affected nonrecollective retrieval and because subjects' recall protocols were clustered by valence. The results challenge the hypothesis that valence affects only recollection, and they clarify previous inconsistent findings about the effects of emotion on memory accuracy and brain activity.
作者使用双加工模型研究了效价和唤醒度对记忆的影响,该模型通过量化回忆的再认和非再认成分,而不依赖元认知判断将它们分开。结果表明,与中性词相比,有情绪的词增加了重构(非再认检索的一个成分)。此外,作者发现,与负性效价相比,正性效价增加了再认检索,而与正性效价相比,负性效价增加了非再认检索。然而,后一种效应取决于唤醒度:只有在唤醒度高时,它才是可靠的。本研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即情绪效价是一种概念概要,因为它影响了非再认检索,而且受试者的回忆方案是根据效价聚类的。研究结果挑战了效价仅影响再认的假设,并且阐明了先前关于情绪对记忆准确性和大脑活动影响的不一致发现。