Institute for Human Neuroscience and Department of Human Development.
Emotion. 2019 Feb;19(1):146-159. doi: 10.1037/emo0000431. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
The emotional valence of target information has been a centerpiece of recent false memory research, but in most experiments, it has been confounded with emotional arousal. We sought to clarify the results of such research by identifying a shared mathematical relation between valence and arousal ratings in commonly administered normed materials. That relation was then used to (a) decide whether arousal as well as valence influences false memory when they are confounded and to (b) determine whether semantic properties that are known to affect false memory covary with valence and arousal ratings. In Study 1, we identified a quadratic relation between valence and arousal ratings of words and pictures that has 2 key properties: Arousal increases more rapidly as function of negative valence than positive valence, and hence, a given level of negative valence is more arousing than the same level of positive valence. This quadratic function predicts that if arousal as well as valence affects false memory when they are confounded, false memory data must have certain fine-grained properties. In Study 2, those properties were absent from norming data for the Cornell-Cortland Emotional Word Lists, indicating that valence but not arousal affects false memory in those norms. In Study 3, we tested fuzzy-trace theory's explanation of that pattern: that valence ratings are positively related to semantic properties that are known to increase false memory, but arousal ratings are not. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
目标信息的情绪效价一直是最近虚假记忆研究的核心内容,但在大多数实验中,它与情绪唤醒混淆在一起。我们试图通过在常用的标准化材料中确定效价和唤醒评分之间的共享数学关系来澄清此类研究的结果。然后,该关系被用于(a)确定当效价和唤醒混淆时,唤醒以及效价是否会影响虚假记忆,以及(b)确定已知会影响虚假记忆的语义属性是否与效价和唤醒评分相关。在研究 1 中,我们确定了词汇和图片的效价和唤醒评分之间的二次关系,该关系具有 2 个关键属性:唤醒随着负效价的函数而比正效价更快地增加,因此,给定水平的负效价比相同水平的正效价更令人兴奋。该二次函数预测,如果唤醒以及效价在混淆时会影响虚假记忆,则虚假记忆数据必须具有某些精细的属性。在研究 2 中,这些属性在康奈尔-科特兰情绪词汇表的标准化数据中不存在,这表明在这些规范中,效价而非唤醒会影响虚假记忆。在研究 3 中,我们测试了模糊痕迹理论对该模式的解释:效价评分与已知会增加虚假记忆的语义属性呈正相关,而唤醒评分则没有。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。