Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Sep;24(9):812-e393. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01938.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
Conventional measures of esophageal pressures or bolus transport fail to identify patients at risk of dysphagia after laparoscopic fundoplication.
Liquid and viscous swallows were evaluated with impedance/manometry in 19 patients with reflux disease before and after surgery. A new method of automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis correlated esophageal pressure with impedance data and automatically calculated a range of pressure and bolus movement variables. An iterative analysis determined whether any variables were altered in relation to dysphagia. Standard measures of esophago-gastric junction pressure, bolus presence time, and total bolus transit time were also evaluated.
At 5 months postop, 15 patients reported some dysphagia, including 7 with new-onset dysphagia. For viscous boluses, three AIM-derived pressure-flow variables recorded preoperatively varied significantly in relation to postoperative dysphagia. These were: time from nadir esophageal impedance to peak esophageal pressure (TNadImp-PeakP), median intra-bolus pressure (IBP, mmHg), and the rate of bolus pressure rise (IBP slope, mmHgs(-1) ). These variables were combined to form a dysphagia risk index (DRI=IBP×IBP_slope/TNadImp-PeakP). DRI values derived from preoperative measurements were significantly elevated in those with postoperative dysphagia (DRI=58, IQR=21-408 vs no dysphagia DRI=9, IQR=2-19, P<0.02). A DRI >14 was optimally predictive of dysphagia (sensitivity 75% and specificity 93%).
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Before surgery, a greater and faster compression of a swallowed viscous bolus with less bolus flow time relates to postoperative dysphagia. Thus, susceptibility to postfundoplication dysphagia is related to a pre-existing sub-clinical variation of esophageal function.
常规的食管压力或食团传输测量方法无法识别腹腔镜胃底折叠术后吞咽困难的风险患者。
在 19 例反流性疾病患者手术前后,采用阻抗/测压法评估液体和粘性吞咽。一种新的自动阻抗测压(AIM)分析方法将食管压力与阻抗数据相关联,并自动计算一系列压力和食团运动变量。迭代分析确定任何变量是否与吞咽困难有关。还评估了胃食管连接部压力、食团存在时间和总食团通过时间等标准测量方法。
术后 5 个月,15 例患者报告存在一些吞咽困难,其中 7 例出现新发吞咽困难。对于粘性食团,术前三个 AIM 衍生的压力-流量变量与术后吞咽困难有显著差异。这些变量是:食管阻抗最低点到食管压力最高点之间的时间(TNadImp-PeakP)、中位食团内压(IBP,mmHg)和食团压力上升率(IBP 斜率,mmHgs(-1))。这些变量组合形成吞咽困难风险指数(DRI=IBP×IBP_slope/TNadImp-PeakP)。术后出现吞咽困难的患者术前测量的 DRI 值明显升高(DRI=58,IQR=21-408 与无吞咽困难 DRI=9,IQR=2-19,P<0.02)。DRI>14 对预测吞咽困难具有最佳的敏感性(75%)和特异性(93%)。
手术前,吞下的粘性食团的压缩更大、更快,且食团流动时间更短,与术后吞咽困难有关。因此,胃底折叠术后吞咽困难的易感性与食管功能的亚临床变异有关。