Suppr超能文献

X 线胶片乳腺摄影、全视野数字化乳腺摄影与数字乳腺断层合成技术的准确性比较。

A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.

机构信息

Breast Radiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2012 Oct;67(10):976-81. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 23.

Abstract

AIM

To measure the change in diagnostic accuracy of conventional film-screen mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with the addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women recalled for assessment following routine screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics approval for the study was granted. Women recalled for assessment following routine screening with screen-film mammography were invited to participate. Participants underwent bilateral, two-view FFDM and two-view DBT. Readers scored each lesion separately for probability of malignancy on screen-film mammography, FFDM, and then DBT. The scores were compared with the presence or absence of malignancy based on the final histopathology outcome.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-eight women participated (93.2% recruitment rate). Following assessment 204 (26.8%) were diagnosed as malignant (147 invasive and 57 in-situ tumours), 286 (37.68%) as benign, and 269 (35.4%) as normal. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by using receiving operating characteristic (ROC) and measurement of area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values demonstrated a significant (p = 0.0001) improvement in the diagnostic accuracy with the addition of DBT combined with FFDM and film-screen mammography (AUC = 0.9671) when compared to FFDM plus film-screen mammography (AUC = 0.8949) and film-screen mammography alone (AUC = 0.7882). The effect was significantly greater for soft-tissue lesions [AUC was 0.9905 with the addition of DBT and AUC was 0.9201 for FFDM with film-screen mammography combined (p = 0.0001)] compared to microcalcification [with the addition of DBT (AUC = 0.7920) and for FFDM with film-screen mammography combined (AUC = 0.7843; p = 0.3182)].

CONCLUSION

The addition of DBT increases the accuracy of mammography compared to FFDM and film-screen mammography combined and film-screen mammography alone in the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue mammographic abnormalities.

摘要

目的

测量在常规筛查后需要评估的女性中,常规屏片乳腺摄影和全数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)联合数字乳腺断层摄影(DBT)的诊断准确性变化。

材料和方法

本研究获得伦理批准。邀请常规屏片乳腺摄影筛查后需要评估的女性参加。参与者接受双侧、双视图 FFDM 和双视图 DBT。读者分别对屏片乳腺摄影、FFDM 然后 DBT 上的每个病变进行恶性可能性评分。评分与最终组织病理学结果的恶性或良性进行比较。

结果

738 名女性参与(93.2%的招募率)。评估后,204 名(26.8%)被诊断为恶性(147 例浸润性和 57 例原位肿瘤),286 名(37.68%)为良性,269 名(35.4%)为正常。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)测量来评估诊断准确性。AUC 值表明,与 FFDM 联合屏片乳腺摄影(AUC=0.8949)和单独屏片乳腺摄影(AUC=0.7882)相比,DBT 联合 FFDM 和屏片乳腺摄影的诊断准确性显著提高(p=0.0001)(AUC=0.9671)。软组织病变的效果明显更大[加入 DBT 的 AUC 为 0.9905,而 FFDM 联合屏片乳腺摄影的 AUC 为 0.9201(p=0.0001)],而微钙化的效果较小[加入 DBT 的 AUC 为 0.7920,而 FFDM 联合屏片乳腺摄影的 AUC 为 0.7843(p=0.3182)]。

结论

与 FFDM 联合屏片乳腺摄影和单独屏片乳腺摄影相比,DBT 的加入提高了评估屏幕检测到的软组织乳腺异常的乳腺摄影准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验